Aaron B. Brown, J. Hellerstein, Matt Hogstrom, Tony S. Lau, S. Lightstone, Peter Shum, M. P. Yost
{"title":"对自治功能进行基准测试:承诺和缺陷","authors":"Aaron B. Brown, J. Hellerstein, Matt Hogstrom, Tony S. Lau, S. Lightstone, Peter Shum, M. P. Yost","doi":"10.1109/ICAC.2004.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benchmarks provide a way to quantify progress in a field. Our goal is to produce a suite of benchmarks covering the four categories of autonomic capabilities: self-configuring, self-healing, self-optimizing, and self-protecting (IBM, 2003). This is not an easy task, however, and in this paper we identify several of the challenges and pitfalls that must be confronted to extend benchmarking technology beyond its traditional basis in performance evaluation.","PeriodicalId":345031,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking autonomic capabilities: promises and pitfalls\",\"authors\":\"Aaron B. Brown, J. Hellerstein, Matt Hogstrom, Tony S. Lau, S. Lightstone, Peter Shum, M. P. Yost\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAC.2004.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Benchmarks provide a way to quantify progress in a field. Our goal is to produce a suite of benchmarks covering the four categories of autonomic capabilities: self-configuring, self-healing, self-optimizing, and self-protecting (IBM, 2003). This is not an easy task, however, and in this paper we identify several of the challenges and pitfalls that must be confronted to extend benchmarking technology beyond its traditional basis in performance evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2004.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2004.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benchmarking autonomic capabilities: promises and pitfalls
Benchmarks provide a way to quantify progress in a field. Our goal is to produce a suite of benchmarks covering the four categories of autonomic capabilities: self-configuring, self-healing, self-optimizing, and self-protecting (IBM, 2003). This is not an easy task, however, and in this paper we identify several of the challenges and pitfalls that must be confronted to extend benchmarking technology beyond its traditional basis in performance evaluation.