电子邮件干预如何提高学生在线作业的完成度?使用A/B比较的案例研究

Angela M. Zavaleta Bernuy, Ziwen Han, Hammad Shaikh, Qiming Zheng, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Anna N. Rafferty, Andrew Petersen, J. J. Williams
{"title":"电子邮件干预如何提高学生在线作业的完成度?使用A/B比较的案例研究","authors":"Angela M. Zavaleta Bernuy, Ziwen Han, Hammad Shaikh, Qiming Zheng, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Anna N. Rafferty, Andrew Petersen, J. J. Williams","doi":"10.1145/3506860.3506874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Email communication between instructors and students is ubiquitous, and it could be valuable to explore ways of testing out how to make email messages more impactful. This paper explores the design space of using emails to get students to plan and reflect on starting weekly homework earlier. We deployed a series of email reminders using randomized A/B comparisons to test alternative factors in the design of these emails, providing examples of an experimental paradigm and metrics for a broader range of interventions. We also surveyed and interviewed instructors and students to compare their predictions about the effectiveness of the reminders with their actual impact. We present our results on which seemingly obvious predictions about effective emails are not borne out, despite there being evidence for further exploring these interventions, as they can sometimes motivate students to attempt their homework more often. We also present qualitative evidence about student opinions and behaviours after receiving the emails, to guide further interventions. These findings provide insight into how to use randomized A/B comparisons in everyday channels such as emails, to provide empirical evidence to test our beliefs about the effectiveness of alternative design choices.","PeriodicalId":185465,"journal":{"name":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can Email Interventions Increase Students’ Completion of Online Homework? A Case Study Using A/B Comparisons\",\"authors\":\"Angela M. Zavaleta Bernuy, Ziwen Han, Hammad Shaikh, Qiming Zheng, Lisa-Angelique Lim, Anna N. Rafferty, Andrew Petersen, J. J. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3506860.3506874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Email communication between instructors and students is ubiquitous, and it could be valuable to explore ways of testing out how to make email messages more impactful. This paper explores the design space of using emails to get students to plan and reflect on starting weekly homework earlier. We deployed a series of email reminders using randomized A/B comparisons to test alternative factors in the design of these emails, providing examples of an experimental paradigm and metrics for a broader range of interventions. We also surveyed and interviewed instructors and students to compare their predictions about the effectiveness of the reminders with their actual impact. We present our results on which seemingly obvious predictions about effective emails are not borne out, despite there being evidence for further exploring these interventions, as they can sometimes motivate students to attempt their homework more often. We also present qualitative evidence about student opinions and behaviours after receiving the emails, to guide further interventions. These findings provide insight into how to use randomized A/B comparisons in everyday channels such as emails, to provide empirical evidence to test our beliefs about the effectiveness of alternative design choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

教师和学生之间的电子邮件交流无处不在,探索测试如何使电子邮件信息更有影响力的方法可能是有价值的。本文探讨了使用电子邮件的设计空间,让学生提前开始每周的作业计划和反思。我们使用随机的a /B比较,部署了一系列电子邮件提醒,以测试这些电子邮件设计中的替代因素,为更广泛的干预措施提供实验范式和指标的示例。我们还对教师和学生进行了调查和访谈,以比较他们对提醒有效性的预测与实际影响。我们提出的结果表明,尽管有证据表明这些干预措施可以进一步探索,但对有效电子邮件的看似明显的预测并未得到证实,因为它们有时可以激励学生更频繁地尝试完成作业。我们还提供了收到电子邮件后学生意见和行为的定性证据,以指导进一步的干预。这些发现提供了如何在日常渠道(如电子邮件)中使用随机A/B比较的见解,以提供经验证据来测试我们对替代设计选择有效性的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How can Email Interventions Increase Students’ Completion of Online Homework? A Case Study Using A/B Comparisons
Email communication between instructors and students is ubiquitous, and it could be valuable to explore ways of testing out how to make email messages more impactful. This paper explores the design space of using emails to get students to plan and reflect on starting weekly homework earlier. We deployed a series of email reminders using randomized A/B comparisons to test alternative factors in the design of these emails, providing examples of an experimental paradigm and metrics for a broader range of interventions. We also surveyed and interviewed instructors and students to compare their predictions about the effectiveness of the reminders with their actual impact. We present our results on which seemingly obvious predictions about effective emails are not borne out, despite there being evidence for further exploring these interventions, as they can sometimes motivate students to attempt their homework more often. We also present qualitative evidence about student opinions and behaviours after receiving the emails, to guide further interventions. These findings provide insight into how to use randomized A/B comparisons in everyday channels such as emails, to provide empirical evidence to test our beliefs about the effectiveness of alternative design choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信