改进深度优先搜索的RNAV进近程序自动设计

David Stauffer, W. Justin Barnes, Leland Smith
{"title":"改进深度优先搜索的RNAV进近程序自动设计","authors":"David Stauffer, W. Justin Barnes, Leland Smith","doi":"10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instrument flight procedures (IFPs) are a cornerstone of the National Airspace System (NAS) and provide paths and instructions for aircraft to safely operate in restricted visibility and in congested airspace. Design of IFPs that adhere to the criteria developed by the FAA to ensure safe flight can be a tedious, iterative task. This is particularly true in areas with complex obstacle/terrain environments. Previous work was conducted by MITRE to develop criteria modules (CM) capable of analyzing a procedure design’s compliance with FAA criteria. In this paper, these engines are leveraged to evaluate batches of candidate procedures. To ensure convergence to an acceptable solution in a reasonable period, a modified depth-first search algorithm was designed to mimic the general design flow used by human procedure designers. By combining this algorithm with the capability of the CMs and a batch cluster for analyzing multiple procedures in parallel, it is shown that procedures can be built in tightly constrained situations by adapting common algorithms to the specific requirements of IFP design.","PeriodicalId":424869,"journal":{"name":"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Depth-First Search for the Automated Design of RNAV Approach Procedures\",\"authors\":\"David Stauffer, W. Justin Barnes, Leland Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instrument flight procedures (IFPs) are a cornerstone of the National Airspace System (NAS) and provide paths and instructions for aircraft to safely operate in restricted visibility and in congested airspace. Design of IFPs that adhere to the criteria developed by the FAA to ensure safe flight can be a tedious, iterative task. This is particularly true in areas with complex obstacle/terrain environments. Previous work was conducted by MITRE to develop criteria modules (CM) capable of analyzing a procedure design’s compliance with FAA criteria. In this paper, these engines are leveraged to evaluate batches of candidate procedures. To ensure convergence to an acceptable solution in a reasonable period, a modified depth-first search algorithm was designed to mimic the general design flow used by human procedure designers. By combining this algorithm with the capability of the CMs and a batch cluster for analyzing multiple procedures in parallel, it is shown that procedures can be built in tightly constrained situations by adapting common algorithms to the specific requirements of IFP design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9222971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

仪表飞行程序(ifp)是国家空域系统(NAS)的基石,为飞机在能见度受限和拥挤空域中安全运行提供路径和指令。按照FAA制定的标准来设计ifp,以确保飞行安全,这可能是一项乏味而反复的任务。在具有复杂障碍/地形环境的区域尤其如此。MITRE之前的工作是开发标准模块(CM),能够分析程序设计是否符合FAA标准。在本文中,这些引擎被用来评估候选过程的批次。为了确保在合理的时间内收敛到可接受的解决方案,设计了一种改进的深度优先搜索算法来模拟人类程序设计者使用的一般设计流程。通过将该算法与CMs和批处理聚类并行分析多个过程的能力相结合,表明通过调整通用算法来适应IFP设计的特定要求,可以在严格约束的情况下构建过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified Depth-First Search for the Automated Design of RNAV Approach Procedures
Instrument flight procedures (IFPs) are a cornerstone of the National Airspace System (NAS) and provide paths and instructions for aircraft to safely operate in restricted visibility and in congested airspace. Design of IFPs that adhere to the criteria developed by the FAA to ensure safe flight can be a tedious, iterative task. This is particularly true in areas with complex obstacle/terrain environments. Previous work was conducted by MITRE to develop criteria modules (CM) capable of analyzing a procedure design’s compliance with FAA criteria. In this paper, these engines are leveraged to evaluate batches of candidate procedures. To ensure convergence to an acceptable solution in a reasonable period, a modified depth-first search algorithm was designed to mimic the general design flow used by human procedure designers. By combining this algorithm with the capability of the CMs and a batch cluster for analyzing multiple procedures in parallel, it is shown that procedures can be built in tightly constrained situations by adapting common algorithms to the specific requirements of IFP design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信