书评:构筑法国:1870-1914年法国风景的表现

M. Gandy
{"title":"书评:构筑法国:1870-1914年法国风景的表现","authors":"M. Gandy","doi":"10.1177/096746080100800410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This collection of essays emerged out of the 1994 exhibition entitled Monet to Matisse: landscape painting in France, 1874–1914 held at the National Gallery of Scotland in Edinburgh. The editor, Richard Thomson, notes in his introduction that the study of French landscape art has developed significantly in recent years through the innovative contributions of Nicholas Green, Robert Herbert and others. This collection seeks to extend these insights and explicitly disengage from the narrowly formalist or Romantic legacy of art-historical writing on depictions of nature and landscape. The period under examination marks a series of transformations in both the physical characteristics of the French landscape and the different ways in which these landscapes were experienced by an increasingly urbanized, mobile and culturally sophisticated set of audiences. The opening essay by John House explores the status of French landscape painting in the 1870s. House links the production of art at this time to the repressive context of the Third Republic in the wake of the disastrous FrancoPrussian war. The foreign policy débâcle fostered a nationalistic emphasis on historical, religious or mythological subjects. As a consequence, landscape art found itself in an ambiguous relation to the salon and newly emerging trends in the French art market. In Chapter 2 Joy Newton considers parallels between naturalistic landscape depictions in art and literature. She explores the close social and intellectual interaction between Zola and Cézanne and their shared pursuit of multi-perspectival forms of cultural representation. The focus on Cézanne is also elaborated by Richard Shiff, who examines the significance of ‘blurring’ as a painterly technique which has become central to the modernist conceptualization of landscape aesthetics. Shiff finds historical continuities between the art of Cézanne and the postwar representational experimentation of Chuck Close and Jasper Johns. In Chapter 4 Griselda Pollock considers the crosscultural translation of landscape art between Holland and the south of France through the paintings of Van Gogh. She examines the simultaneous development of political disengagement and exoticist imagery in his work as part of a wider difficulty of engagement with the emerging avant-garde in Paris. The extraordinary permutations in the art of Maurice Denis form the focus of Jean-Paul Bouillon’s chapter. In seems as if the landscapes of Denis have compressed every facet of the evolving relation between art and nature in the First World War era ranging from traditional classicism to Symbolism. A close reading of a lesser-known artist from this era is also developed with Richard Thomson’s essay on the innovative murals of Henri Martin. For Thomson, the 508 Book reviews","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914\",\"authors\":\"M. Gandy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/096746080100800410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This collection of essays emerged out of the 1994 exhibition entitled Monet to Matisse: landscape painting in France, 1874–1914 held at the National Gallery of Scotland in Edinburgh. The editor, Richard Thomson, notes in his introduction that the study of French landscape art has developed significantly in recent years through the innovative contributions of Nicholas Green, Robert Herbert and others. This collection seeks to extend these insights and explicitly disengage from the narrowly formalist or Romantic legacy of art-historical writing on depictions of nature and landscape. The period under examination marks a series of transformations in both the physical characteristics of the French landscape and the different ways in which these landscapes were experienced by an increasingly urbanized, mobile and culturally sophisticated set of audiences. The opening essay by John House explores the status of French landscape painting in the 1870s. House links the production of art at this time to the repressive context of the Third Republic in the wake of the disastrous FrancoPrussian war. The foreign policy débâcle fostered a nationalistic emphasis on historical, religious or mythological subjects. As a consequence, landscape art found itself in an ambiguous relation to the salon and newly emerging trends in the French art market. In Chapter 2 Joy Newton considers parallels between naturalistic landscape depictions in art and literature. She explores the close social and intellectual interaction between Zola and Cézanne and their shared pursuit of multi-perspectival forms of cultural representation. The focus on Cézanne is also elaborated by Richard Shiff, who examines the significance of ‘blurring’ as a painterly technique which has become central to the modernist conceptualization of landscape aesthetics. Shiff finds historical continuities between the art of Cézanne and the postwar representational experimentation of Chuck Close and Jasper Johns. In Chapter 4 Griselda Pollock considers the crosscultural translation of landscape art between Holland and the south of France through the paintings of Van Gogh. She examines the simultaneous development of political disengagement and exoticist imagery in his work as part of a wider difficulty of engagement with the emerging avant-garde in Paris. The extraordinary permutations in the art of Maurice Denis form the focus of Jean-Paul Bouillon’s chapter. In seems as if the landscapes of Denis have compressed every facet of the evolving relation between art and nature in the First World War era ranging from traditional classicism to Symbolism. A close reading of a lesser-known artist from this era is also developed with Richard Thomson’s essay on the innovative murals of Henri Martin. For Thomson, the 508 Book reviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":104830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080100800410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本文集出自1994年在爱丁堡苏格兰国家美术馆举办的名为“莫奈到马蒂斯:1874-1914年法国风景画”的展览。编辑理查德·汤姆森在他的引言中指出,近年来,通过尼古拉斯·格林、罗伯特·赫伯特等人的创新贡献,法国风景艺术的研究有了显著的发展。这个系列旨在扩展这些见解,并明确脱离狭隘的形式主义或浪漫主义的艺术历史遗产,描绘自然和风景。这一时期标志着法国景观的物理特征以及日益城市化、流动性和文化复杂的观众体验这些景观的不同方式的一系列转变。约翰·豪斯的开篇文章探讨了19世纪70年代法国风景画的地位。House将这一时期的艺术生产与法兰西第三共和国在灾难性的法俄战争之后的压抑背景联系起来。在外交政策上,cle培养了一种强调历史、宗教或神话主题的民族主义。因此,风景艺术发现自己与沙龙和法国艺术市场新兴趋势的关系模糊不清。在第二章中,乔伊·牛顿考虑了艺术和文学中自然主义风景画的相似之处。她探讨了左拉和csamzanne之间密切的社会和智力互动,以及他们对多元文化表现形式的共同追求。Richard Shiff对csamzanne的关注也进行了详细阐述,他研究了“模糊”作为一种绘画技术的重要性,这种绘画技术已经成为现代主义景观美学概念化的核心。希夫发现,czyzanne的艺术与战后查克·克洛斯(Chuck Close)和贾斯珀·约翰斯(Jasper Johns)的代表性实验之间存在历史上的连续性。在第四章中,格里塞尔达·波洛克通过梵高的绘画考察了荷兰和法国南部之间风景艺术的跨文化翻译。她考察了他的作品中政治脱离和异国情调意象的同时发展,作为与巴黎新兴前卫接触的更广泛困难的一部分。莫里斯·丹尼斯(Maurice Denis)艺术中的非凡排列构成了让-保罗·布永(Jean-Paul Bouillon)这一章的重点。从传统的古典主义到象征主义,丹尼斯的风景画似乎压缩了第一次世界大战时期艺术与自然之间不断发展的关系的各个方面。理查德·汤姆森(Richard Thomson)关于亨利·马丁(Henri Martin)创新壁画的文章也发展了对这个时代一位不太知名的艺术家的仔细阅读。对汤姆森来说,这是508本书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914
This collection of essays emerged out of the 1994 exhibition entitled Monet to Matisse: landscape painting in France, 1874–1914 held at the National Gallery of Scotland in Edinburgh. The editor, Richard Thomson, notes in his introduction that the study of French landscape art has developed significantly in recent years through the innovative contributions of Nicholas Green, Robert Herbert and others. This collection seeks to extend these insights and explicitly disengage from the narrowly formalist or Romantic legacy of art-historical writing on depictions of nature and landscape. The period under examination marks a series of transformations in both the physical characteristics of the French landscape and the different ways in which these landscapes were experienced by an increasingly urbanized, mobile and culturally sophisticated set of audiences. The opening essay by John House explores the status of French landscape painting in the 1870s. House links the production of art at this time to the repressive context of the Third Republic in the wake of the disastrous FrancoPrussian war. The foreign policy débâcle fostered a nationalistic emphasis on historical, religious or mythological subjects. As a consequence, landscape art found itself in an ambiguous relation to the salon and newly emerging trends in the French art market. In Chapter 2 Joy Newton considers parallels between naturalistic landscape depictions in art and literature. She explores the close social and intellectual interaction between Zola and Cézanne and their shared pursuit of multi-perspectival forms of cultural representation. The focus on Cézanne is also elaborated by Richard Shiff, who examines the significance of ‘blurring’ as a painterly technique which has become central to the modernist conceptualization of landscape aesthetics. Shiff finds historical continuities between the art of Cézanne and the postwar representational experimentation of Chuck Close and Jasper Johns. In Chapter 4 Griselda Pollock considers the crosscultural translation of landscape art between Holland and the south of France through the paintings of Van Gogh. She examines the simultaneous development of political disengagement and exoticist imagery in his work as part of a wider difficulty of engagement with the emerging avant-garde in Paris. The extraordinary permutations in the art of Maurice Denis form the focus of Jean-Paul Bouillon’s chapter. In seems as if the landscapes of Denis have compressed every facet of the evolving relation between art and nature in the First World War era ranging from traditional classicism to Symbolism. A close reading of a lesser-known artist from this era is also developed with Richard Thomson’s essay on the innovative murals of Henri Martin. For Thomson, the 508 Book reviews
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信