K. Izdebski, A. S. Oliveira, Bryan R. Schlink, Petr Legkov, Silke Kärcher, W. Hairston, Daniel P. Ferris, P. König
{"title":"EEG系统的可用性:用户体验研究","authors":"K. Izdebski, A. S. Oliveira, Bryan R. Schlink, Petr Legkov, Silke Kärcher, W. Hairston, Daniel P. Ferris, P. König","doi":"10.1145/2910674.2910714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years there was a change in EEG experimental designs - from simple behavior in the lab to complex behavior outside. That change required also an adjustment of EEG systems -- from being static and sensitive to mobile and noise-resistant. The rapid technological development has to balance performance (e.g. number of channels, low impedance contact) with usability (e.g. comfort for the participant, contact pressure, wet/dry electrodes) and mobility (e.g. wiring, weight). This has led to wide variety of designs which differ widely in properties. Here we compare 7 EEG systems with respect to the participant's user experience. Results demonstrate that from perspective of user experience of participants, mobile wet system (Cwet) had the highest score.","PeriodicalId":359504,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of EEG Systems: User Experience Study\",\"authors\":\"K. Izdebski, A. S. Oliveira, Bryan R. Schlink, Petr Legkov, Silke Kärcher, W. Hairston, Daniel P. Ferris, P. König\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2910674.2910714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years there was a change in EEG experimental designs - from simple behavior in the lab to complex behavior outside. That change required also an adjustment of EEG systems -- from being static and sensitive to mobile and noise-resistant. The rapid technological development has to balance performance (e.g. number of channels, low impedance contact) with usability (e.g. comfort for the participant, contact pressure, wet/dry electrodes) and mobility (e.g. wiring, weight). This has led to wide variety of designs which differ widely in properties. Here we compare 7 EEG systems with respect to the participant's user experience. Results demonstrate that from perspective of user experience of participants, mobile wet system (Cwet) had the highest score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910674.2910714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2910674.2910714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent years there was a change in EEG experimental designs - from simple behavior in the lab to complex behavior outside. That change required also an adjustment of EEG systems -- from being static and sensitive to mobile and noise-resistant. The rapid technological development has to balance performance (e.g. number of channels, low impedance contact) with usability (e.g. comfort for the participant, contact pressure, wet/dry electrodes) and mobility (e.g. wiring, weight). This has led to wide variety of designs which differ widely in properties. Here we compare 7 EEG systems with respect to the participant's user experience. Results demonstrate that from perspective of user experience of participants, mobile wet system (Cwet) had the highest score.