使用流程治理框架分析美国联邦政府在人工智能教育方面的行动

Mihir Menon, Yu-Che Chen
{"title":"使用流程治理框架分析美国联邦政府在人工智能教育方面的行动","authors":"Mihir Menon, Yu-Che Chen","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments, businesses, and researchers are paying increased attention to the application of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) [7]. AIEd technologies pose potential challenges to privacy, equity, and intellectual property, as seen with the early effects of OpenAI's Chat-GPT in education. However, current AIEd research fails to evaluate existing policy through a holistic view of the development and design process. We use Chen and Ahn's process governance framework [4] to analyze current United States federal documents about the intersection of AI and education. BERT aids our analysis by quantifying sentence similarity between the documents and the process framework. We recommend that legislators focus on public values during goal-setting and student involvement throughout the process.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing US Federal Action on Artificial Intelligence Education Using a Process Governance Framework\",\"authors\":\"Mihir Menon, Yu-Che Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3598469.3598546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governments, businesses, and researchers are paying increased attention to the application of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) [7]. AIEd technologies pose potential challenges to privacy, equity, and intellectual property, as seen with the early effects of OpenAI's Chat-GPT in education. However, current AIEd research fails to evaluate existing policy through a holistic view of the development and design process. We use Chen and Ahn's process governance framework [4] to analyze current United States federal documents about the intersection of AI and education. BERT aids our analysis by quantifying sentence similarity between the documents and the process framework. We recommend that legislators focus on public values during goal-setting and student involvement throughout the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府、企业和研究人员越来越关注人工智能在教育中的应用[7]。人工智能技术对隐私、公平和知识产权构成了潜在的挑战,OpenAI的Chat-GPT在教育领域的早期影响就是一个例子。然而,目前的AIEd研究未能通过开发和设计过程的整体观点来评估现有政策。我们使用Chen和Ahn的过程治理框架[4]来分析当前关于人工智能与教育交叉的美国联邦文件。BERT通过量化文档和过程框架之间的句子相似度来辅助我们的分析。我们建议立法者在制定目标时关注公共价值观,并在整个过程中关注学生的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing US Federal Action on Artificial Intelligence Education Using a Process Governance Framework
Governments, businesses, and researchers are paying increased attention to the application of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) [7]. AIEd technologies pose potential challenges to privacy, equity, and intellectual property, as seen with the early effects of OpenAI's Chat-GPT in education. However, current AIEd research fails to evaluate existing policy through a holistic view of the development and design process. We use Chen and Ahn's process governance framework [4] to analyze current United States federal documents about the intersection of AI and education. BERT aids our analysis by quantifying sentence similarity between the documents and the process framework. We recommend that legislators focus on public values during goal-setting and student involvement throughout the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信