{"title":"运动后热水浸泡引发热适应反应在耐力和休闲运动员。系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Jack Martin","doi":"10.31273/reinvention.v13i2.661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims \nThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heat acclimation (HA) via hot water immersion protocols and their effect on time trial (TT) performance, heart rate (HRE, HRM and HRTT), rectal temperature (Tre), Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), psychological stress index (PhSI), thermal comfort (Tcomf), thermal sensation (Tsen) and maximum oxygen uptake (Vo2max). \nMethods \nPubmed, Scopus, Sportdiscus and Web of Science databases were used alongside the grey matter sites Google Scholar and Researchgate. The databases were then searched for randomised control trials and mixed-method design studies. Two RTCs, six repeated measure design studies and one randomised crossover design study were included after screening a total of 50 titles and 28 full-text articles. Sample sizes range from 1 - 13 with all participants having not participated in any form of heat training 6 months before their inclusion in the study. \nResults \nThe mean difference (MD) for Heart rate (HR) was -9.1125 BPM (95% CI p = 0.026) and was considered to be statistically significant. The MD for Rectal temperature (Tre) effect size was -0.3814 Tre (°C) (95% CI; p = 0.05). The MD for sweat rate was 0.085; (96% CI; p = 0.0179)\nThe changes in RPE, PhSI, Tcomf and Tsen were too small to be considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference between pre and post HA for Vo2max and PV. \nThis meta-analysis implies that HA via HWI may improve tolerance to discomfort during heat exposure and thus subsequently improve physical performance during exercise in hot conditions.\nConclusion \nThe primary finding of this meta-analysis is that athletic performance is improved with post-exercise hot water immersion heat acclimation training. \nHWI HA protocols should focus on the following guidelines: \n40-50 minutes of submaximal exercise (>65% of Vo2max) should be followed directly (within 10 minutes) by 40 minutes of hot water immersion at 40°C with the individual immersed up to their neck. \nThe HA protocol should last between 6-9 days with a single bout of HWI every day for this period. ","PeriodicalId":183531,"journal":{"name":"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-exercise hot water immersion elicites heat acclimation responses in endurance and recreational athletes. A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jack Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.31273/reinvention.v13i2.661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims \\nThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heat acclimation (HA) via hot water immersion protocols and their effect on time trial (TT) performance, heart rate (HRE, HRM and HRTT), rectal temperature (Tre), Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), psychological stress index (PhSI), thermal comfort (Tcomf), thermal sensation (Tsen) and maximum oxygen uptake (Vo2max). \\nMethods \\nPubmed, Scopus, Sportdiscus and Web of Science databases were used alongside the grey matter sites Google Scholar and Researchgate. The databases were then searched for randomised control trials and mixed-method design studies. Two RTCs, six repeated measure design studies and one randomised crossover design study were included after screening a total of 50 titles and 28 full-text articles. Sample sizes range from 1 - 13 with all participants having not participated in any form of heat training 6 months before their inclusion in the study. \\nResults \\nThe mean difference (MD) for Heart rate (HR) was -9.1125 BPM (95% CI p = 0.026) and was considered to be statistically significant. The MD for Rectal temperature (Tre) effect size was -0.3814 Tre (°C) (95% CI; p = 0.05). The MD for sweat rate was 0.085; (96% CI; p = 0.0179)\\nThe changes in RPE, PhSI, Tcomf and Tsen were too small to be considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference between pre and post HA for Vo2max and PV. \\nThis meta-analysis implies that HA via HWI may improve tolerance to discomfort during heat exposure and thus subsequently improve physical performance during exercise in hot conditions.\\nConclusion \\nThe primary finding of this meta-analysis is that athletic performance is improved with post-exercise hot water immersion heat acclimation training. \\nHWI HA protocols should focus on the following guidelines: \\n40-50 minutes of submaximal exercise (>65% of Vo2max) should be followed directly (within 10 minutes) by 40 minutes of hot water immersion at 40°C with the individual immersed up to their neck. \\nThe HA protocol should last between 6-9 days with a single bout of HWI every day for this period. \",\"PeriodicalId\":183531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research\",\"volume\":\"247 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v13i2.661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v13i2.661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本荟萃分析旨在评估热适应(HA)通过热水浸泡方案的有效性及其对计时赛(TT)成绩、心率(HRE、HRM和HRTT)、直肠温度(Tre)、感知消耗率(RPE)、心理应激指数(PhSI)、热舒适(tcomfort)、热感觉(Tsen)和最大摄氧量(Vo2max)的影响。方法使用Pubmed、Scopus、Sportdiscus和Web of Science数据库以及Google Scholar和Researchgate等灰质网站。然后在数据库中搜索随机对照试验和混合方法设计研究。在筛选了总共50个标题和28篇全文文章后,纳入了2个rtc、6个重复测量设计研究和1个随机交叉设计研究。样本量从1 - 13人不等,所有参与者在纳入研究前6个月未参加任何形式的热训练。结果两组患者心率(HR)的平均差异(MD)为-9.1125 BPM (95% CI p = 0.026),具有统计学意义。直肠温度(Tre)效应大小的MD为-0.3814 Tre(°C) (95% CI;P = 0.05)。排汗率MD为0.085;(96%可信区间;p = 0.0179) RPE、PhSI、Tcomf和Tsen的变化太小,不具有统计学意义。HA前后Vo2max和PV无显著差异。这项荟萃分析表明,通过HWI的HA可以提高热暴露时对不适的耐受性,从而提高在高温条件下运动时的身体表现。结论本荟萃分析的主要发现是运动后热水浸泡热适应训练能提高运动成绩。HWI - HA方案应侧重于以下指导方针:40-50分钟的亚极限运动(>65%的最大摄氧量)应直接(在10分钟内)通过40分钟的40°C热水浸泡,个人浸泡至颈部。HA协议应持续6-9天,在此期间每天进行一次HWI。
Post-exercise hot water immersion elicites heat acclimation responses in endurance and recreational athletes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Aims
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heat acclimation (HA) via hot water immersion protocols and their effect on time trial (TT) performance, heart rate (HRE, HRM and HRTT), rectal temperature (Tre), Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), psychological stress index (PhSI), thermal comfort (Tcomf), thermal sensation (Tsen) and maximum oxygen uptake (Vo2max).
Methods
Pubmed, Scopus, Sportdiscus and Web of Science databases were used alongside the grey matter sites Google Scholar and Researchgate. The databases were then searched for randomised control trials and mixed-method design studies. Two RTCs, six repeated measure design studies and one randomised crossover design study were included after screening a total of 50 titles and 28 full-text articles. Sample sizes range from 1 - 13 with all participants having not participated in any form of heat training 6 months before their inclusion in the study.
Results
The mean difference (MD) for Heart rate (HR) was -9.1125 BPM (95% CI p = 0.026) and was considered to be statistically significant. The MD for Rectal temperature (Tre) effect size was -0.3814 Tre (°C) (95% CI; p = 0.05). The MD for sweat rate was 0.085; (96% CI; p = 0.0179)
The changes in RPE, PhSI, Tcomf and Tsen were too small to be considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference between pre and post HA for Vo2max and PV.
This meta-analysis implies that HA via HWI may improve tolerance to discomfort during heat exposure and thus subsequently improve physical performance during exercise in hot conditions.
Conclusion
The primary finding of this meta-analysis is that athletic performance is improved with post-exercise hot water immersion heat acclimation training.
HWI HA protocols should focus on the following guidelines:
40-50 minutes of submaximal exercise (>65% of Vo2max) should be followed directly (within 10 minutes) by 40 minutes of hot water immersion at 40°C with the individual immersed up to their neck.
The HA protocol should last between 6-9 days with a single bout of HWI every day for this period.