语义场“攻击性”的表征

M. Malysheva
{"title":"语义场“攻击性”的表征","authors":"M. Malysheva","doi":"10.18524/2307-8332.2021.2(24).251852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is dedicated to the definition of the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative study of its dictionary definitions, the associative field and the discourse in the network.\nThe purpose of the research is to determine the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative analysis of its dictionary definitions and associative field. The main tasks specified: 1) to form the lexical-semantic field of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the dictionary definitions; 2) to develop the associative field of the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ based on the based on the results of the associative experiment; 3) to expand the developed field structure according to the comparative analysis of the formed fields; 4) to clarify the structure of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ using the material of the social media texts.\nThe object of the research is the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’, and the subject is the lexico-semantic and associative fields of the said lexeme.\nLexicographic sources, the associative experiment and the Ukrainian-speaking segment of the social network Facebook as of 2021 serve as the main source base of the study.\nAt the first stage, the lexicographic sources were analyzed, and it was discovered that the interpretation of aggression as an armed attack of one state towards another is primary. However, modern dictionaries extend the meaning of this lexeme to the area of human relationships and the environment. It was established that the physical component of the concept of aggression prevails in the dictionaries of synonyms, while the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ isn’t present in the associative dictionaries. Taking this into account, the core and the periphery of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ were defined.\nAt the second stage, a linguistic associative experiment was carried out. The experiment involved 90 people, a total of 90 responses to the stimulus ‘aggression’ were obtained, 44 of which were unique. Based on those, the core and the periphery of the associative field ‘aggression’ were developed, taking into account the criteria of non-random association.\nAt the third stage, the lexical-semantic and the associative fields were compared, and it was discovered that the dictionary definitions of the lexeme ‘aggression’ only partially correlate with the resulting associates.\nAt the final stage, the discourse in the social networks was analyzed. Based on the comparative analysis of the vocabulary definitions, the associative experiment and the analysis of the social media texts, seven main lexical-semantic groups were identified, forming the lexical-semantic field of ‘aggression’: \"Feelings\", \"Manifestation of feelings\", \"State of hostility\", \"Violent act\", \"Object of aggression\", \"Aggressor\", \"Colors\".\nThe proposed structure is subjective, therefore the improvement of the given lexical-semantic field is considered the next top priority.","PeriodicalId":113251,"journal":{"name":"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE REPRESENTATION OF THE SEMANTIC FIELD ‘AGGRESSION’\",\"authors\":\"M. Malysheva\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2307-8332.2021.2(24).251852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper is dedicated to the definition of the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative study of its dictionary definitions, the associative field and the discourse in the network.\\nThe purpose of the research is to determine the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative analysis of its dictionary definitions and associative field. The main tasks specified: 1) to form the lexical-semantic field of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the dictionary definitions; 2) to develop the associative field of the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ based on the based on the results of the associative experiment; 3) to expand the developed field structure according to the comparative analysis of the formed fields; 4) to clarify the structure of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ using the material of the social media texts.\\nThe object of the research is the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’, and the subject is the lexico-semantic and associative fields of the said lexeme.\\nLexicographic sources, the associative experiment and the Ukrainian-speaking segment of the social network Facebook as of 2021 serve as the main source base of the study.\\nAt the first stage, the lexicographic sources were analyzed, and it was discovered that the interpretation of aggression as an armed attack of one state towards another is primary. However, modern dictionaries extend the meaning of this lexeme to the area of human relationships and the environment. It was established that the physical component of the concept of aggression prevails in the dictionaries of synonyms, while the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ isn’t present in the associative dictionaries. Taking this into account, the core and the periphery of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ were defined.\\nAt the second stage, a linguistic associative experiment was carried out. The experiment involved 90 people, a total of 90 responses to the stimulus ‘aggression’ were obtained, 44 of which were unique. Based on those, the core and the periphery of the associative field ‘aggression’ were developed, taking into account the criteria of non-random association.\\nAt the third stage, the lexical-semantic and the associative fields were compared, and it was discovered that the dictionary definitions of the lexeme ‘aggression’ only partially correlate with the resulting associates.\\nAt the final stage, the discourse in the social networks was analyzed. Based on the comparative analysis of the vocabulary definitions, the associative experiment and the analysis of the social media texts, seven main lexical-semantic groups were identified, forming the lexical-semantic field of ‘aggression’: \\\"Feelings\\\", \\\"Manifestation of feelings\\\", \\\"State of hostility\\\", \\\"Violent act\\\", \\\"Object of aggression\\\", \\\"Aggressor\\\", \\\"Colors\\\".\\nThe proposed structure is subjective, therefore the improvement of the given lexical-semantic field is considered the next top priority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-8332.2021.2(24).251852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-8332.2021.2(24).251852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在比较研究词素“侵略”的词典定义、联想场和网络语篇的基础上,对其语义内容进行了界定。本研究的目的是在对词素“侵略”的词典定义和联想场进行比较分析的基础上,确定其语义内容。本文的主要任务是:1)在词典定义的基础上形成词素“侵略”的词汇语义场;2)以联想实验结果为基础,拓展词汇刺激“攻击”的联想场;3)通过对已形成油田的对比分析,拓展已发育的油田结构;4)利用社交媒体文本材料澄清词汇语义场“侵略”的结构。研究对象是词汇“攻击性”的语义内容,主体是词汇“攻击性”的词汇语义场和联想场。词典来源、联想实验和截至2021年的社交网络Facebook的乌克兰语部分是该研究的主要来源基础。在第一阶段,对词典来源进行了分析,发现将侵略解释为一个国家对另一个国家的武装攻击是主要的。然而,现代词典把这个词的意思扩展到人际关系和环境领域。结果表明,同义词词典中存在攻击概念的物理成分,而联想词典中不存在词汇刺激成分“攻击”。考虑到这一点,我们定义了词汇语义领域“侵略”的核心和外围。第二阶段进行语言联想实验。实验涉及90个人,总共获得了90种对“攻击性”刺激的反应,其中44种是独特的。在此基础上,考虑到非随机联想的标准,开发了联想领域“侵略”的核心和外围。在第三阶段,比较词汇语义场和联想场,发现词典对词素“侵略”的定义仅部分与产生的联想相关。最后,对社交网络中的话语进行分析。通过词汇定义对比分析、联想实验和社交媒体文本分析,确定了七个主要词汇语义群,形成了“攻击”词汇语义场:“感觉”、“感觉的表现”、“敌对状态”、“暴力行为”、“攻击对象”、“侵略者”、“颜色”。所提出的结构是主观的,因此改进给定的词汇语义领域被认为是下一个优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE REPRESENTATION OF THE SEMANTIC FIELD ‘AGGRESSION’
The paper is dedicated to the definition of the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative study of its dictionary definitions, the associative field and the discourse in the network. The purpose of the research is to determine the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the comparative analysis of its dictionary definitions and associative field. The main tasks specified: 1) to form the lexical-semantic field of the lexeme ‘aggression’ on the basis of the dictionary definitions; 2) to develop the associative field of the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ based on the based on the results of the associative experiment; 3) to expand the developed field structure according to the comparative analysis of the formed fields; 4) to clarify the structure of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ using the material of the social media texts. The object of the research is the semantic content of the lexeme ‘aggression’, and the subject is the lexico-semantic and associative fields of the said lexeme. Lexicographic sources, the associative experiment and the Ukrainian-speaking segment of the social network Facebook as of 2021 serve as the main source base of the study. At the first stage, the lexicographic sources were analyzed, and it was discovered that the interpretation of aggression as an armed attack of one state towards another is primary. However, modern dictionaries extend the meaning of this lexeme to the area of human relationships and the environment. It was established that the physical component of the concept of aggression prevails in the dictionaries of synonyms, while the lexeme-stimulus ‘aggression’ isn’t present in the associative dictionaries. Taking this into account, the core and the periphery of the lexical-semantic field ‘aggression’ were defined. At the second stage, a linguistic associative experiment was carried out. The experiment involved 90 people, a total of 90 responses to the stimulus ‘aggression’ were obtained, 44 of which were unique. Based on those, the core and the periphery of the associative field ‘aggression’ were developed, taking into account the criteria of non-random association. At the third stage, the lexical-semantic and the associative fields were compared, and it was discovered that the dictionary definitions of the lexeme ‘aggression’ only partially correlate with the resulting associates. At the final stage, the discourse in the social networks was analyzed. Based on the comparative analysis of the vocabulary definitions, the associative experiment and the analysis of the social media texts, seven main lexical-semantic groups were identified, forming the lexical-semantic field of ‘aggression’: "Feelings", "Manifestation of feelings", "State of hostility", "Violent act", "Object of aggression", "Aggressor", "Colors". The proposed structure is subjective, therefore the improvement of the given lexical-semantic field is considered the next top priority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信