通过合法和参与式决策改善城市生活:瑞士的数据驱动方法

Thomas P. Wellings, Sirjoni Majumdar, Regula Haenggli Fricker, Evangelos Pournaras
{"title":"通过合法和参与式决策改善城市生活:瑞士的数据驱动方法","authors":"Thomas P. Wellings, Sirjoni Majumdar, Regula Haenggli Fricker, Evangelos Pournaras","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a novel data-driven approach to address challenges faced by city policymakers concerning the distribution of public funds. Providing budgeting processes for improving quality of life based on objective (data-driven) evidence has been so far a missing element in policy-making. This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland, and analyzes survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making. Our approach is twofold. On the one hand, we aim to optimize the legitimacy of policymakers’ decisions by identifying the level of investment in neighborhoods and projects that offer the greatest return in legitimacy. To do so, we introduce a new context-independent legitimacy metric for policymakers. This metric allows us to distinguish decisive vs. indecisive collective preferences for neighborhoods or projects on which to invest, enabling policymakers to prioritize impactful bottom-up consultations and participatory initiatives (e.g., participatory budgeting). The metric also allows policymakers to identify the optimal number of investments in various project sectors and neighborhoods (in terms of legitimacy gain). On the other hand, we aim to offer guidance to policymakers concerning which satisfaction and participation factors influence citizens’ quality of life through an accurate classification model and an evaluation of relocations. By doing so, policymakers may be able to further refine their strategy, making targeted investments with significant benefits to citizens’ quality of life. These findings are expected to provide transformative insights for practicing direct democracy in Switzerland and a blueprint for policy-making to adopt worldwide.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P. Wellings, Sirjoni Majumdar, Regula Haenggli Fricker, Evangelos Pournaras\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3598469.3598472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces a novel data-driven approach to address challenges faced by city policymakers concerning the distribution of public funds. Providing budgeting processes for improving quality of life based on objective (data-driven) evidence has been so far a missing element in policy-making. This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland, and analyzes survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making. Our approach is twofold. On the one hand, we aim to optimize the legitimacy of policymakers’ decisions by identifying the level of investment in neighborhoods and projects that offer the greatest return in legitimacy. To do so, we introduce a new context-independent legitimacy metric for policymakers. This metric allows us to distinguish decisive vs. indecisive collective preferences for neighborhoods or projects on which to invest, enabling policymakers to prioritize impactful bottom-up consultations and participatory initiatives (e.g., participatory budgeting). The metric also allows policymakers to identify the optimal number of investments in various project sectors and neighborhoods (in terms of legitimacy gain). On the other hand, we aim to offer guidance to policymakers concerning which satisfaction and participation factors influence citizens’ quality of life through an accurate classification model and an evaluation of relocations. By doing so, policymakers may be able to further refine their strategy, making targeted investments with significant benefits to citizens’ quality of life. These findings are expected to provide transformative insights for practicing direct democracy in Switzerland and a blueprint for policy-making to adopt worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了一种新的数据驱动方法,以解决城市决策者在公共资金分配方面面临的挑战。为改善生活质量提供基于客观(数据驱动的)证据的预算编制程序迄今是决策中缺少的一个因素。本文以瑞士阿劳市1204名市民为研究对象,对调查数据进行分析,这些调查数据包含影响决策合法性的有见地的指标。我们的方法是双重的。一方面,我们的目标是通过确定能够提供最大合法性回报的社区和项目的投资水平来优化政策制定者决策的合法性。为此,我们为政策制定者引入了一种新的与上下文无关的合法性指标。这一指标使我们能够区分对社区或投资项目的决定性和优柔寡断的集体偏好,使政策制定者能够优先考虑有影响力的自下而上的磋商和参与性倡议(例如,参与性预算)。该指标还使政策制定者能够确定各个项目部门和社区的最佳投资数量(就合法性获得而言)。另一方面,我们的目标是通过精确的分类模型和对搬迁的评估,为决策者提供关于满意度和参与因素对公民生活质量影响的指导。通过这样做,政策制定者可能能够进一步完善他们的战略,进行有针对性的投资,为公民的生活质量带来重大好处。这些研究结果有望为瑞士实行直接民主提供变革性的见解,并为全球政策制定提供蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland
This paper introduces a novel data-driven approach to address challenges faced by city policymakers concerning the distribution of public funds. Providing budgeting processes for improving quality of life based on objective (data-driven) evidence has been so far a missing element in policy-making. This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland, and analyzes survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making. Our approach is twofold. On the one hand, we aim to optimize the legitimacy of policymakers’ decisions by identifying the level of investment in neighborhoods and projects that offer the greatest return in legitimacy. To do so, we introduce a new context-independent legitimacy metric for policymakers. This metric allows us to distinguish decisive vs. indecisive collective preferences for neighborhoods or projects on which to invest, enabling policymakers to prioritize impactful bottom-up consultations and participatory initiatives (e.g., participatory budgeting). The metric also allows policymakers to identify the optimal number of investments in various project sectors and neighborhoods (in terms of legitimacy gain). On the other hand, we aim to offer guidance to policymakers concerning which satisfaction and participation factors influence citizens’ quality of life through an accurate classification model and an evaluation of relocations. By doing so, policymakers may be able to further refine their strategy, making targeted investments with significant benefits to citizens’ quality of life. These findings are expected to provide transformative insights for practicing direct democracy in Switzerland and a blueprint for policy-making to adopt worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信