Oskars Kulmanis
{"title":"Pušu līdztiesības principa nozīme pirmstiesas izmeklēšanā","authors":"Oskars Kulmanis","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to further assessment of the principle of equality of arms and its elements that may be applicable to the pre-trial investigation stage of criminal proceedings. The article includes evaluation of two practical elements determined by paragraph 1 and 3 (d) of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, the right to question witnesses in pre-trial investigation and the right to rely on assistance by private experts. The pre-trial stage of proceedings in the Republic of Latvia is not held according to the principle of adversarial proceedings. Therefore, the article will address a question, whether rights of the defence and principle of equality of arms grant the suspect the right to interrogate witnesses and rely on assistance by experts in pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings. The European Court of Human Rights has emphasized several procedural safeguards regarding the aforementioned rights and their meaning in fair proceedings.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于进一步评估可能适用于刑事诉讼审前调查阶段的平等权利原则及其要素。该条包括对《欧洲人权公约》第6条第1款和第3 (d)款确定的两个实际因素的评价,即在审判前调查中询问证人的权利和依靠私人专家援助的权利。在拉脱维亚共和国,诉讼的审前阶段不是根据对抗性诉讼原则进行的。因此,该条将处理一个问题,即辩护权和武器平等原则是否赋予嫌疑犯在刑事诉讼的审前调查中询问证人和依靠专家协助的权利。欧洲人权法院强调了关于上述权利及其在公平诉讼中的意义的若干程序保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pušu līdztiesības principa nozīme pirmstiesas izmeklēšanā
This article is dedicated to further assessment of the principle of equality of arms and its elements that may be applicable to the pre-trial investigation stage of criminal proceedings. The article includes evaluation of two practical elements determined by paragraph 1 and 3 (d) of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights, the right to question witnesses in pre-trial investigation and the right to rely on assistance by private experts. The pre-trial stage of proceedings in the Republic of Latvia is not held according to the principle of adversarial proceedings. Therefore, the article will address a question, whether rights of the defence and principle of equality of arms grant the suspect the right to interrogate witnesses and rely on assistance by experts in pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings. The European Court of Human Rights has emphasized several procedural safeguards regarding the aforementioned rights and their meaning in fair proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信