警察行动推特反响的情绪分析

Marcos Fontes Feitosa, Saul Rocha, G. Gonçalves, C. H. G. Ferreira, Jussara M. Almeida
{"title":"警察行动推特反响的情绪分析","authors":"Marcos Fontes Feitosa, Saul Rocha, G. Gonçalves, C. H. G. Ferreira, Jussara M. Almeida","doi":"10.1145/3539637.3558050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violence and a sense of insecurity are among the main problems in urban centres. In Brazil, an average rate of 20 deaths per month is estimated for every 100,000 inhabitants due to violence. Virtual social networks are increasingly used as a means for users to express their opinions or indignation about this problem. In this article, we analyze the sentiment of users in comments shared on Twitter about police operations with great repercussions in news portals in Brazil. In this sense, we explore lexicon and machine learning models to understand the emotion in which users discuss public safety on social networks and their opinion about the work of government agencies to reduce violence in cities. Our experiments show how challenging this inference is given peculiar characteristics of the context, such as mostly negative and sarcastic expressions. Nevertheless, our best classifiers achieved accuracy and specificity (macro F1) greater than 60% for identifying sentiments polarity, indicating a promising methodology for automatically inferring public opinion about police operations.","PeriodicalId":350776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Repercussion of Police Operations\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Fontes Feitosa, Saul Rocha, G. Gonçalves, C. H. G. Ferreira, Jussara M. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3539637.3558050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Violence and a sense of insecurity are among the main problems in urban centres. In Brazil, an average rate of 20 deaths per month is estimated for every 100,000 inhabitants due to violence. Virtual social networks are increasingly used as a means for users to express their opinions or indignation about this problem. In this article, we analyze the sentiment of users in comments shared on Twitter about police operations with great repercussions in news portals in Brazil. In this sense, we explore lexicon and machine learning models to understand the emotion in which users discuss public safety on social networks and their opinion about the work of government agencies to reduce violence in cities. Our experiments show how challenging this inference is given peculiar characteristics of the context, such as mostly negative and sarcastic expressions. Nevertheless, our best classifiers achieved accuracy and specificity (macro F1) greater than 60% for identifying sentiments polarity, indicating a promising methodology for automatically inferring public opinion about police operations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3539637.3558050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3539637.3558050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

暴力和不安全感是城市中心的主要问题。在巴西,估计每月每10万居民中平均有20人死于暴力。虚拟社交网络越来越多地被用户用来表达他们对这个问题的意见或愤慨。在这篇文章中,我们分析了用户在Twitter上分享的评论中对警方行动的看法,这些行动在巴西的新闻门户网站上产生了巨大的影响。从这个意义上说,我们探索了词汇和机器学习模型,以了解用户在社交网络上讨论公共安全时的情绪,以及他们对政府机构减少城市暴力工作的看法。我们的实验表明,在语境的特殊特征下,比如大多数是消极和讽刺的表达,这种推断是多么具有挑战性。尽管如此,我们最好的分类器在识别情绪极性方面实现了超过60%的准确性和特异性(宏观F1),这表明一种有前途的方法可以自动推断公众对警察行动的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Repercussion of Police Operations
Violence and a sense of insecurity are among the main problems in urban centres. In Brazil, an average rate of 20 deaths per month is estimated for every 100,000 inhabitants due to violence. Virtual social networks are increasingly used as a means for users to express their opinions or indignation about this problem. In this article, we analyze the sentiment of users in comments shared on Twitter about police operations with great repercussions in news portals in Brazil. In this sense, we explore lexicon and machine learning models to understand the emotion in which users discuss public safety on social networks and their opinion about the work of government agencies to reduce violence in cities. Our experiments show how challenging this inference is given peculiar characteristics of the context, such as mostly negative and sarcastic expressions. Nevertheless, our best classifiers achieved accuracy and specificity (macro F1) greater than 60% for identifying sentiments polarity, indicating a promising methodology for automatically inferring public opinion about police operations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信