网络嵌入性与新技术探索:技术距离、中间性、中心性与密度

B. Nooteboom, V. Gilsing, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, A. van den Oord
{"title":"网络嵌入性与新技术探索:技术距离、中间性、中心性与密度","authors":"B. Nooteboom, V. Gilsing, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, A. van den Oord","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.903743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to understand better the innovation potential of a firm's alliance network. Here we analyze the role of an alliance network in terms of the technological distance between partners, a firm's network position (centrality) and total network density. We study how these three elements of an alliance network, separately and in combination, affect the 'twin tasks' in exploration, namely novelty creation on the one hand and its efficient absorption on the other hand. For an empirical test, we study technology-based alliance networks in the pharmaceutical, chemical and automotive industries. Our findings indicate that successful exploration indeed seems to require a delicate balance between these two exploration tasks. A second conclusion is that different network positions yield different pay-offs in terms of the number of explorative patents. In other words, success rates for exploration are not spread equally across firms. However, position alone does not tell the full story. Our empirical findings clearly indicate that exploration success also depends on the other two dimensions of embeddedness, namely technological distance and network density. The three elements of network embeddedness need to be considered jointly in order to understand their complementary effects on both novelty creation and absorptive capacity. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)","PeriodicalId":193943,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"852","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density\",\"authors\":\"B. Nooteboom, V. Gilsing, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, A. van den Oord\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.903743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to understand better the innovation potential of a firm's alliance network. Here we analyze the role of an alliance network in terms of the technological distance between partners, a firm's network position (centrality) and total network density. We study how these three elements of an alliance network, separately and in combination, affect the 'twin tasks' in exploration, namely novelty creation on the one hand and its efficient absorption on the other hand. For an empirical test, we study technology-based alliance networks in the pharmaceutical, chemical and automotive industries. Our findings indicate that successful exploration indeed seems to require a delicate balance between these two exploration tasks. A second conclusion is that different network positions yield different pay-offs in terms of the number of explorative patents. In other words, success rates for exploration are not spread equally across firms. However, position alone does not tell the full story. Our empirical findings clearly indicate that exploration success also depends on the other two dimensions of embeddedness, namely technological distance and network density. The three elements of network embeddedness need to be considered jointly in order to understand their complementary effects on both novelty creation and absorptive capacity. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":193943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"852\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.903743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.903743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 852

摘要

本文旨在更好地理解企业联盟网络的创新潜力。本文从合作伙伴之间的技术距离、企业的网络位置(中心性)和总网络密度三个方面分析了联盟网络的作用。我们研究了联盟网络的这三个要素分别和组合如何影响探索中的“双任务”,即一方面是新颖性创造,另一方面是有效吸收。为了进行实证检验,我们研究了制药、化工和汽车行业基于技术的联盟网络。我们的研究结果表明,成功的勘探确实似乎需要这两个勘探任务之间的微妙平衡。第二个结论是,就探索性专利的数量而言,不同的网络位置产生不同的回报。换句话说,勘探的成功率在各个公司之间并不是平均分布的。然而,仅靠立场并不能说明全部问题。我们的实证研究结果清楚地表明,探索成功还取决于嵌入性的其他两个维度,即技术距离和网络密度。网络嵌入性的三个要素需要共同考虑,以了解它们对新颖性创造和吸收能力的互补作用。(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)(这篇摘要是从这个项目的另一个版本借来的)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density
This paper aims to understand better the innovation potential of a firm's alliance network. Here we analyze the role of an alliance network in terms of the technological distance between partners, a firm's network position (centrality) and total network density. We study how these three elements of an alliance network, separately and in combination, affect the 'twin tasks' in exploration, namely novelty creation on the one hand and its efficient absorption on the other hand. For an empirical test, we study technology-based alliance networks in the pharmaceutical, chemical and automotive industries. Our findings indicate that successful exploration indeed seems to require a delicate balance between these two exploration tasks. A second conclusion is that different network positions yield different pay-offs in terms of the number of explorative patents. In other words, success rates for exploration are not spread equally across firms. However, position alone does not tell the full story. Our empirical findings clearly indicate that exploration success also depends on the other two dimensions of embeddedness, namely technological distance and network density. The three elements of network embeddedness need to be considered jointly in order to understand their complementary effects on both novelty creation and absorptive capacity. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.) (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信