青少年足球运动员的跳跃和下肢力量不对称:沙地和常规地面的差异

I. Sannicandro, G. Cofano, R. D’Onofrio, A. Piccinno
{"title":"青少年足球运动员的跳跃和下肢力量不对称:沙地和常规地面的差异","authors":"I. Sannicandro, G. Cofano, R. D’Onofrio, A. Piccinno","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.4.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purpose. The aim of the study was to evaluate jumping performance and lower limbs strength asymmetry in young soccer players by comparing this movement performed on both a conventional surface and a sand surface.\nMaterials and methods. 20 young soccer players under 17 years old randomly performed a standing long jump, a single hop jump in the sagittal plane (Hop Jump Test) and a single side hop jump in the frontal plane (Side Hop Jump Test), first on a conventional surface (natural grass) and then on sand. The jump distance and strength asymmetry was calculated using the formula: (NDL / DL) x 100.\nResults. The values from the two different jumping conditions showed a statistically significant decrease in the Broad Jump Test (p<0.001, ES: 3.56), Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.99), Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 3.95), Side Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.67) and Side Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 2.98) in the sand condition.\nThe asymmetry values in the Hop Jump Test and the Side Hop Jump Test showed a statistically significant increase (+21.5%, p<0.001, ES: 3.66 and +41.1%, p<0.001, ES: 1.99, respectively) when comparing the performance on grass and sand.\nConclusions. This different performance response in the two different jumping modes leads to the hypothesis that young soccer players who want to stress their explosive strength ability and joint stability should favor the use of one-leg rather than two-leg jumps.\nThe values described in the study lead to the hypothesis that training on sand should be suggested when the young soccer player presents modest values of inter-limb asymmetry measured on a conventional surface.","PeriodicalId":178000,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jumps and Lower Limb Strength Asymmetry in Young Soccer Players: Differences Between Sand and Conventional Surfaces\",\"authors\":\"I. Sannicandro, G. Cofano, R. D’Onofrio, A. Piccinno\",\"doi\":\"10.17309/tmfv.2023.4.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study purpose. The aim of the study was to evaluate jumping performance and lower limbs strength asymmetry in young soccer players by comparing this movement performed on both a conventional surface and a sand surface.\\nMaterials and methods. 20 young soccer players under 17 years old randomly performed a standing long jump, a single hop jump in the sagittal plane (Hop Jump Test) and a single side hop jump in the frontal plane (Side Hop Jump Test), first on a conventional surface (natural grass) and then on sand. The jump distance and strength asymmetry was calculated using the formula: (NDL / DL) x 100.\\nResults. The values from the two different jumping conditions showed a statistically significant decrease in the Broad Jump Test (p<0.001, ES: 3.56), Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.99), Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 3.95), Side Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.67) and Side Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 2.98) in the sand condition.\\nThe asymmetry values in the Hop Jump Test and the Side Hop Jump Test showed a statistically significant increase (+21.5%, p<0.001, ES: 3.66 and +41.1%, p<0.001, ES: 1.99, respectively) when comparing the performance on grass and sand.\\nConclusions. This different performance response in the two different jumping modes leads to the hypothesis that young soccer players who want to stress their explosive strength ability and joint stability should favor the use of one-leg rather than two-leg jumps.\\nThe values described in the study lead to the hypothesis that training on sand should be suggested when the young soccer player presents modest values of inter-limb asymmetry measured on a conventional surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Education Theory and Methodology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Education Theory and Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.4.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.4.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的目的。这项研究的目的是通过比较在常规地面和沙地上进行的跳跃动作,来评估年轻足球运动员的跳跃表现和下肢力量的不对称性。材料和方法。20名17岁以下的青少年足球运动员随机进行立定跳远、矢状面单跳(跳跳测试)和正面单跳(侧跳测试),先在常规地面(天然草地)上,然后在沙地上进行。跳跃距离和强度不对称性计算公式为:(NDL / DL) × 100。两种不同跳跃条件下,沙地条件下跳远测试(p<0.001, ES: 3.56)、跳跳测试左肢体(p<0.001, ES: 4.99)、跳跳测试右肢体(p<0.001, ES: 3.95)、侧跳测试左肢体(p<0.001, ES: 4.67)和侧跳测试右肢体(p<0.001, ES: 2.98)的数值均有统计学意义的降低。在草地和沙地上,跳跃测试和侧跳测试的不对称性值分别增加了21.5% (p<0.001, ES: 3.66)和41.1% (p<0.001, ES: 1.99),差异有统计学意义。在两种不同的跳跃模式下,这种不同的表现反应导致了这样的假设:想要强调他们的爆发力能力和关节稳定性的年轻足球运动员应该倾向于使用单腿而不是两条腿的跳跃。研究中描述的值导致假设,当年轻的足球运动员在常规表面上测量的肢体间不对称呈现适度值时,应该建议在沙地上进行训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jumps and Lower Limb Strength Asymmetry in Young Soccer Players: Differences Between Sand and Conventional Surfaces
Study purpose. The aim of the study was to evaluate jumping performance and lower limbs strength asymmetry in young soccer players by comparing this movement performed on both a conventional surface and a sand surface. Materials and methods. 20 young soccer players under 17 years old randomly performed a standing long jump, a single hop jump in the sagittal plane (Hop Jump Test) and a single side hop jump in the frontal plane (Side Hop Jump Test), first on a conventional surface (natural grass) and then on sand. The jump distance and strength asymmetry was calculated using the formula: (NDL / DL) x 100. Results. The values from the two different jumping conditions showed a statistically significant decrease in the Broad Jump Test (p<0.001, ES: 3.56), Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.99), Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 3.95), Side Hop Jump Test left limb (p<0.001, ES: 4.67) and Side Hop Jump Test right limb (p<0.001, ES: 2.98) in the sand condition. The asymmetry values in the Hop Jump Test and the Side Hop Jump Test showed a statistically significant increase (+21.5%, p<0.001, ES: 3.66 and +41.1%, p<0.001, ES: 1.99, respectively) when comparing the performance on grass and sand. Conclusions. This different performance response in the two different jumping modes leads to the hypothesis that young soccer players who want to stress their explosive strength ability and joint stability should favor the use of one-leg rather than two-leg jumps. The values described in the study lead to the hypothesis that training on sand should be suggested when the young soccer player presents modest values of inter-limb asymmetry measured on a conventional surface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信