联邦公开市场委员会的透明度和审议:计算语言学方法

Stephen Hansen, Michael McMahon, A. Prat
{"title":"联邦公开市场委员会的透明度和审议:计算语言学方法","authors":"Stephen Hansen, Michael McMahon, A. Prat","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjx045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does transparency, a key feature of central bank design, aect the deliberation of monetary policymakers? We exploit a natural experiment in the Federal Open Market Committee in 1993 together with computational linguistic models (particularly Latent Dirichlet Allocation) to measure the eect of increased transparency on debate. Commentators have hypothesized both a benecial discipline eect","PeriodicalId":359449,"journal":{"name":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"443","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: a computational linguistics approach\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Hansen, Michael McMahon, A. Prat\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qje/qjx045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How does transparency, a key feature of central bank design, aect the deliberation of monetary policymakers? We exploit a natural experiment in the Federal Open Market Committee in 1993 together with computational linguistic models (particularly Latent Dirichlet Allocation) to measure the eect of increased transparency on debate. Commentators have hypothesized both a benecial discipline eect\",\"PeriodicalId\":359449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"443\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 443

摘要

透明度是央行设计的一个关键特征,它如何影响货币政策制定者的考虑?我们利用1993年联邦公开市场委员会的一个自然实验,结合计算语言模型(特别是潜在狄利克雷分配)来衡量增加透明度对辩论的影响。评论家们假设两者都是有益的纪律效应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: a computational linguistics approach
How does transparency, a key feature of central bank design, aect the deliberation of monetary policymakers? We exploit a natural experiment in the Federal Open Market Committee in 1993 together with computational linguistic models (particularly Latent Dirichlet Allocation) to measure the eect of increased transparency on debate. Commentators have hypothesized both a benecial discipline eect
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信