英格兰地区的政治不满:经济不满在南北鸿沟中的作用

ERN: Equity Pub Date : 2020-03-18 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3556877
Lawrence McKay
{"title":"英格兰地区的政治不满:经济不满在南北鸿沟中的作用","authors":"Lawrence McKay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3556877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most nations exhibit regional inequality and the developing wisdom among ‘elites’ is that ‘peripheral’, ‘left-behind’ regions are more dissatisfied with politics: however, the ways that regional inequality can affect discontent are theoretically underspecified and hardly tested empirically. In the context of the UK, I explore three mechanisms. First, I consider location in the core-periphery; second, perceptions about the economic performance of one’s own region, third, feelings that one’s region is in ‘relative deprivation’ in relation to the capital, London. I confirm that Northern, ‘peripheral’ regions are more dissatisfied than the ‘core’, London. Second, the more negative people are about their own region’s economy, the more likely they are to express discontent, helping to explain the greater discontent people report in the ‘peripheral’ North of England specifically. Third, I find that ‘relative deprivation’ is associated with increased discontent. This effect is strongest for people who have a sense of belonging to their region, and is consistent with a ‘group justification’ argument whereby people who feel ‘left behind’ displace this onto political actors to ‘justify’ their group’s situation. These results are, in theory, generalisable, but particularly shine light on the political challenge of reducing discontent through investing in struggling regions in the UK.","PeriodicalId":282303,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Discontent Across English Regions: The Role of Economic Grievances in the North South Divide\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence McKay\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3556877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most nations exhibit regional inequality and the developing wisdom among ‘elites’ is that ‘peripheral’, ‘left-behind’ regions are more dissatisfied with politics: however, the ways that regional inequality can affect discontent are theoretically underspecified and hardly tested empirically. In the context of the UK, I explore three mechanisms. First, I consider location in the core-periphery; second, perceptions about the economic performance of one’s own region, third, feelings that one’s region is in ‘relative deprivation’ in relation to the capital, London. I confirm that Northern, ‘peripheral’ regions are more dissatisfied than the ‘core’, London. Second, the more negative people are about their own region’s economy, the more likely they are to express discontent, helping to explain the greater discontent people report in the ‘peripheral’ North of England specifically. Third, I find that ‘relative deprivation’ is associated with increased discontent. This effect is strongest for people who have a sense of belonging to their region, and is consistent with a ‘group justification’ argument whereby people who feel ‘left behind’ displace this onto political actors to ‘justify’ their group’s situation. These results are, in theory, generalisable, but particularly shine light on the political challenge of reducing discontent through investing in struggling regions in the UK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Equity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数国家都表现出地区不平等,“精英”中发展起来的智慧是,“边缘”、“落后”地区对政治更不满意:然而,地区不平等影响不满的方式在理论上没有得到充分说明,也几乎没有经过实证检验。在英国的背景下,我探讨了三个机制。首先,我考虑的是位于核心-外围的位置;第二,对自己所在地区经济表现的看法;第三,感觉自己所在地区与首都伦敦相比处于“相对贫困”状态。我确信,北部“外围”地区比“核心”伦敦更不满意。其次,人们对自己所在地区的经济越消极,他们就越有可能表达不满,这有助于解释人们在英格兰北部“外围”地区报告的更大不满。第三,我发现“相对剥夺”与不满情绪的增加有关。对于那些对自己所在地区有归属感的人来说,这种影响是最强的,这与“群体辩护”的论点是一致的,即那些感到“被遗忘”的人将这种影响转移到政治行动者身上,以“证明”他们群体的处境。从理论上讲,这些结果是可以推广的,但它们尤其揭示了通过投资英国陷入困境的地区来减少不满情绪的政治挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Discontent Across English Regions: The Role of Economic Grievances in the North South Divide
Most nations exhibit regional inequality and the developing wisdom among ‘elites’ is that ‘peripheral’, ‘left-behind’ regions are more dissatisfied with politics: however, the ways that regional inequality can affect discontent are theoretically underspecified and hardly tested empirically. In the context of the UK, I explore three mechanisms. First, I consider location in the core-periphery; second, perceptions about the economic performance of one’s own region, third, feelings that one’s region is in ‘relative deprivation’ in relation to the capital, London. I confirm that Northern, ‘peripheral’ regions are more dissatisfied than the ‘core’, London. Second, the more negative people are about their own region’s economy, the more likely they are to express discontent, helping to explain the greater discontent people report in the ‘peripheral’ North of England specifically. Third, I find that ‘relative deprivation’ is associated with increased discontent. This effect is strongest for people who have a sense of belonging to their region, and is consistent with a ‘group justification’ argument whereby people who feel ‘left behind’ displace this onto political actors to ‘justify’ their group’s situation. These results are, in theory, generalisable, but particularly shine light on the political challenge of reducing discontent through investing in struggling regions in the UK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信