衡量开放获取的指标:来源和工具

Ángel Borrego
{"title":"衡量开放获取的指标:来源和工具","authors":"Ángel Borrego","doi":"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the percentage of open access publications available is the most pragmatic indicator for measuring the concreteness of open science policies and can be found in most plans in this field. This note offers a review of the literature published in the last decade about the evolution of open access to the scientific literature and the analysis of open access indicators developed in different countries. The results show that, when creating an open access indicator, it is necessary to make decisions regarding the collection of documents on which the calculation will be carried out, the tool that will be used to determine the availability of open access documents, the definition and typologies of open access being studied, the possible inclusion of additional sources of information, aspects related to timing, and the publication of the documentation necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the indicator.","PeriodicalId":365329,"journal":{"name":"Anuario ThinkEPI","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicadores de medición del acceso abierto: fuentes y herramientas\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Borrego\",\"doi\":\"10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining the percentage of open access publications available is the most pragmatic indicator for measuring the concreteness of open science policies and can be found in most plans in this field. This note offers a review of the literature published in the last decade about the evolution of open access to the scientific literature and the analysis of open access indicators developed in different countries. The results show that, when creating an open access indicator, it is necessary to make decisions regarding the collection of documents on which the calculation will be carried out, the tool that will be used to determine the availability of open access documents, the definition and typologies of open access being studied, the possible inclusion of additional sources of information, aspects related to timing, and the publication of the documentation necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the indicator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario ThinkEPI\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario ThinkEPI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario ThinkEPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

确定开放获取出版物的百分比是衡量开放科学政策的具体程度的最实用的指标,可以在该领域的大多数计划中找到。本文回顾了近十年来发表的有关科学文献开放获取发展的文献,并分析了不同国家制定的开放获取指标。结果表明,在创建开放获取指标时,有必要就以下方面做出决策:将进行计算的文档集合、用于确定开放获取文档可用性的工具、正在研究的开放获取的定义和类型、可能包含的额外信息来源、与时间相关的方面、并出版必要的文件,以保证指标的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indicadores de medición del acceso abierto: fuentes y herramientas
Determining the percentage of open access publications available is the most pragmatic indicator for measuring the concreteness of open science policies and can be found in most plans in this field. This note offers a review of the literature published in the last decade about the evolution of open access to the scientific literature and the analysis of open access indicators developed in different countries. The results show that, when creating an open access indicator, it is necessary to make decisions regarding the collection of documents on which the calculation will be carried out, the tool that will be used to determine the availability of open access documents, the definition and typologies of open access being studied, the possible inclusion of additional sources of information, aspects related to timing, and the publication of the documentation necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the indicator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信