多元文化媒介空间中的民族观念概念:形式逻辑与非正式逻辑

Simonova Irina
{"title":"多元文化媒介空间中的民族观念概念:形式逻辑与非正式逻辑","authors":"Simonova Irina","doi":"10.15826/b978-5-7996-3081-2.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the one hand, the relevance of research is due to the great social, managerial and research potential of the ‘national idea’ concept; on the other hand, the possible risks of incorrect formation and implementation against the background of poor development of a comprehensive methodology for analysing its construction logic. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify and conceptualise, in the context of the theory of formality and informality, the dominant logics of understanding and shaping of the national idea that have emerged today in the modern media space. The article focuses on a comparative analysis of two dominant logics, formal (traditional), where it is understood as a directive formed by elites and is centrally determined for the general public, regardless of the local cultural characteristics of its members; and informal, the emergence of which is due to individualisation, heterogeneity, multiculturalism of modern society, and it involves an appeal to the plurality of bases and cultural nuances as well as intersecting local practices as a basis for building a new concept of the national idea. In the second version, the national idea is considered as a ‘national idea for me’, which is formed in the cross flow of official sources of information along with informal communities, personal connections and alternative versions of other nations. Differences in the language of description and forms of broadcasting, which determine the formal and informal versions of the national idea and circulate through various channels and differ in the corresponding content, are of great importance. Methodologically, we rely on the theory of formality and informality, social topology, social heterology, the provisions of the general intellect theory. Data collection methods (focused on a qualitative strategy): scientometric analysis, analysis of scientific texts, community review on VK.com, Facebook, and news analysis in the official media. The research was carried out with Russian materials and the article provides an overview and arranges academic approaches that determine both","PeriodicalId":314156,"journal":{"name":"Communication Trends in the Post-Literacy Era: Polylingualism, Multimodality and Multiculturalism As Preconditions for New Creativity","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of a National Idea in a Multicultural Media Space: Formal vs Informal Logics\",\"authors\":\"Simonova Irina\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/b978-5-7996-3081-2.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the one hand, the relevance of research is due to the great social, managerial and research potential of the ‘national idea’ concept; on the other hand, the possible risks of incorrect formation and implementation against the background of poor development of a comprehensive methodology for analysing its construction logic. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify and conceptualise, in the context of the theory of formality and informality, the dominant logics of understanding and shaping of the national idea that have emerged today in the modern media space. The article focuses on a comparative analysis of two dominant logics, formal (traditional), where it is understood as a directive formed by elites and is centrally determined for the general public, regardless of the local cultural characteristics of its members; and informal, the emergence of which is due to individualisation, heterogeneity, multiculturalism of modern society, and it involves an appeal to the plurality of bases and cultural nuances as well as intersecting local practices as a basis for building a new concept of the national idea. In the second version, the national idea is considered as a ‘national idea for me’, which is formed in the cross flow of official sources of information along with informal communities, personal connections and alternative versions of other nations. Differences in the language of description and forms of broadcasting, which determine the formal and informal versions of the national idea and circulate through various channels and differ in the corresponding content, are of great importance. Methodologically, we rely on the theory of formality and informality, social topology, social heterology, the provisions of the general intellect theory. Data collection methods (focused on a qualitative strategy): scientometric analysis, analysis of scientific texts, community review on VK.com, Facebook, and news analysis in the official media. The research was carried out with Russian materials and the article provides an overview and arranges academic approaches that determine both\",\"PeriodicalId\":314156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Trends in the Post-Literacy Era: Polylingualism, Multimodality and Multiculturalism As Preconditions for New Creativity\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Trends in the Post-Literacy Era: Polylingualism, Multimodality and Multiculturalism As Preconditions for New Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/b978-5-7996-3081-2.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Trends in the Post-Literacy Era: Polylingualism, Multimodality and Multiculturalism As Preconditions for New Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/b978-5-7996-3081-2.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一方面,研究的相关性是由于“国家理念”概念具有巨大的社会、管理和研究潜力;另一方面,在分析其构建逻辑的综合方法论发展不佳的背景下,不正确的形成和实施可能存在的风险。因此,本文的目的是在正式和非正式理论的背景下,识别和概念化今天在现代媒体空间中出现的理解和塑造国家观念的主导逻辑。本文着重对两种占主导地位的逻辑进行了比较分析,一种是形式(传统)逻辑,它被理解为由精英形成的指令,是为普通公众而集中确定的,而不考虑其成员的当地文化特征;非正式的,它的出现是由于现代社会的个体化、异质性、多元文化主义,它涉及到对基础的多元化和文化细微差别的呼吁,以及交叉的地方实践,作为建立国家观念新概念的基础。在第二个版本中,国家理念被认为是“我的国家理念”,它是在官方信息来源与非正式社区、个人关系和其他国家的替代版本的交叉流动中形成的。描述语言和传播形式的差异决定了国家思想的正式和非正式版本,并通过各种渠道传播,相应的内容也有所不同,这是非常重要的。在方法论上,我们依靠正式与非正式理论、社会拓扑学、社会异质学、一般智力理论的规定。数据收集方法(侧重于定性策略):科学计量分析、科学文本分析、VK.com、Facebook上的社区评论和官方媒体的新闻分析。这项研究是用俄罗斯材料进行的,本文提供了一个概述,并安排了确定两者的学术方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of a National Idea in a Multicultural Media Space: Formal vs Informal Logics
On the one hand, the relevance of research is due to the great social, managerial and research potential of the ‘national idea’ concept; on the other hand, the possible risks of incorrect formation and implementation against the background of poor development of a comprehensive methodology for analysing its construction logic. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify and conceptualise, in the context of the theory of formality and informality, the dominant logics of understanding and shaping of the national idea that have emerged today in the modern media space. The article focuses on a comparative analysis of two dominant logics, formal (traditional), where it is understood as a directive formed by elites and is centrally determined for the general public, regardless of the local cultural characteristics of its members; and informal, the emergence of which is due to individualisation, heterogeneity, multiculturalism of modern society, and it involves an appeal to the plurality of bases and cultural nuances as well as intersecting local practices as a basis for building a new concept of the national idea. In the second version, the national idea is considered as a ‘national idea for me’, which is formed in the cross flow of official sources of information along with informal communities, personal connections and alternative versions of other nations. Differences in the language of description and forms of broadcasting, which determine the formal and informal versions of the national idea and circulate through various channels and differ in the corresponding content, are of great importance. Methodologically, we rely on the theory of formality and informality, social topology, social heterology, the provisions of the general intellect theory. Data collection methods (focused on a qualitative strategy): scientometric analysis, analysis of scientific texts, community review on VK.com, Facebook, and news analysis in the official media. The research was carried out with Russian materials and the article provides an overview and arranges academic approaches that determine both
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信