A. Sharman, I. Yermakova, Elmira Erenchina, Gulnara Tyulebekova, Aisulu Bekzhanova
{"title":"可燃香烟和加热烟草制品使用者的呼吸功能、体能和代谢综合征成分:一项为期四年的随访队列研究","authors":"A. Sharman, I. Yermakova, Elmira Erenchina, Gulnara Tyulebekova, Aisulu Bekzhanova","doi":"10.12974/2312-5470.2022.08.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and is the fourth leading cause of death in Kazakhstan. Cigarette smoking is a prevalent risk factor for COPD. While quitting smoking is the preferred way to reduce COPD risk, literature suggests that heated tobacco products (HTP) might be a better option for people who cannot quit smoking. The aim of this paper was to analyze the long-term effects of shifting to HTP use in long-term smokers compared to continued combustible cigarettes (CC) use. \nPatients and methods: A cohort of 1200 participants (400 HTP and 800 CC) aged 40-59 years with a minimum of 10 pack-year smoking history were recruited and followed for four years. The functional outcomes compared between HTP and CC users included: (1) COPD Assessment Test (CAT); (2) post-bronchodilator lung function; (3) 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test; and (4) metabolic syndrome components. One way ANOVA was used to compare functional outcomes between visits, while multivariable linear mixed models were used to test associations between health outcomes and smoking type (HTP vs. CC) over time. \nResults: Out of 1200 participants 893 (609 CC users and 284 HTP users) remained in the study by the fourth year of follow up. Comparison between functional outcomes showed that most of them have improved between visits, while lung function and fasting blood glucose levels got worse. Linear mixed models showed HTP use was associated with better functional outcomes over time compared to CC users. Lung function decrease was significantly less in HTP users, while improvements in CAT scores, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure were significantly better compared to CC users. \nConclusion: This study demonstrated that HTP users experienced it to a significantly lesser decrease in lung function compared to CC users, while demonstrating better improvements in other functional outcomes. The results of this study suggest that HTP might be a less deleterious alternative compared to CC in people with long history of CC use and who cannot quit smoking.","PeriodicalId":245488,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Function, Physical Capacity, and Metabolic Syndrome Components in Combustible Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Users: A Four-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Sharman, I. Yermakova, Elmira Erenchina, Gulnara Tyulebekova, Aisulu Bekzhanova\",\"doi\":\"10.12974/2312-5470.2022.08.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and is the fourth leading cause of death in Kazakhstan. Cigarette smoking is a prevalent risk factor for COPD. While quitting smoking is the preferred way to reduce COPD risk, literature suggests that heated tobacco products (HTP) might be a better option for people who cannot quit smoking. The aim of this paper was to analyze the long-term effects of shifting to HTP use in long-term smokers compared to continued combustible cigarettes (CC) use. \\nPatients and methods: A cohort of 1200 participants (400 HTP and 800 CC) aged 40-59 years with a minimum of 10 pack-year smoking history were recruited and followed for four years. The functional outcomes compared between HTP and CC users included: (1) COPD Assessment Test (CAT); (2) post-bronchodilator lung function; (3) 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test; and (4) metabolic syndrome components. One way ANOVA was used to compare functional outcomes between visits, while multivariable linear mixed models were used to test associations between health outcomes and smoking type (HTP vs. CC) over time. \\nResults: Out of 1200 participants 893 (609 CC users and 284 HTP users) remained in the study by the fourth year of follow up. Comparison between functional outcomes showed that most of them have improved between visits, while lung function and fasting blood glucose levels got worse. Linear mixed models showed HTP use was associated with better functional outcomes over time compared to CC users. Lung function decrease was significantly less in HTP users, while improvements in CAT scores, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure were significantly better compared to CC users. \\nConclusion: This study demonstrated that HTP users experienced it to a significantly lesser decrease in lung function compared to CC users, while demonstrating better improvements in other functional outcomes. The results of this study suggest that HTP might be a less deleterious alternative compared to CC in people with long history of CC use and who cannot quit smoking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Respiratory Care\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Respiratory Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12974/2312-5470.2022.08.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2312-5470.2022.08.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全世界的主要死亡原因之一,也是哈萨克斯坦的第四大死亡原因。吸烟是慢性阻塞性肺病的一个普遍危险因素。虽然戒烟是降低慢性阻塞性肺病风险的首选方法,但文献表明,加热烟草产品(HTP)可能是无法戒烟的人的更好选择。本文的目的是分析长期吸烟者转向使用HTP与继续使用可燃香烟(CC)的长期影响。患者和方法:招募了1200名参与者(400 HTP和800 CC),年龄在40-59岁之间,吸烟史至少为10包年,随访4年。HTP和CC使用者的功能结局比较包括:(1)COPD评估测试(CAT);(2)支气管扩张剂后肺功能;(3) 6分钟步行距离(6MWD)测试;(4)代谢综合征成分。单因素方差分析用于比较就诊之间的功能结果,而多变量线性混合模型用于测试健康结果与吸烟类型(HTP vs. CC)之间随时间的关系。结果:在1200名参与者中,893名(609名CC用户和284名HTP用户)在随访的第四年仍在研究中。功能结果的比较显示,他们中的大多数人在两次就诊之间有所改善,而肺功能和空腹血糖水平却恶化了。线性混合模型显示,随着时间的推移,与CC用户相比,HTP使用与更好的功能结果相关。与CC使用者相比,HTP使用者的肺功能下降明显更少,而CAT评分、腰围和收缩压的改善明显更好。结论:本研究表明,与CC使用者相比,HTP使用者的肺功能下降明显较小,而其他功能结果则有更好的改善。这项研究的结果表明,对于长期使用CC且无法戒烟的人来说,HTP可能是一种危害较小的选择。
Respiratory Function, Physical Capacity, and Metabolic Syndrome Components in Combustible Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Users: A Four-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study
Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and is the fourth leading cause of death in Kazakhstan. Cigarette smoking is a prevalent risk factor for COPD. While quitting smoking is the preferred way to reduce COPD risk, literature suggests that heated tobacco products (HTP) might be a better option for people who cannot quit smoking. The aim of this paper was to analyze the long-term effects of shifting to HTP use in long-term smokers compared to continued combustible cigarettes (CC) use.
Patients and methods: A cohort of 1200 participants (400 HTP and 800 CC) aged 40-59 years with a minimum of 10 pack-year smoking history were recruited and followed for four years. The functional outcomes compared between HTP and CC users included: (1) COPD Assessment Test (CAT); (2) post-bronchodilator lung function; (3) 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test; and (4) metabolic syndrome components. One way ANOVA was used to compare functional outcomes between visits, while multivariable linear mixed models were used to test associations between health outcomes and smoking type (HTP vs. CC) over time.
Results: Out of 1200 participants 893 (609 CC users and 284 HTP users) remained in the study by the fourth year of follow up. Comparison between functional outcomes showed that most of them have improved between visits, while lung function and fasting blood glucose levels got worse. Linear mixed models showed HTP use was associated with better functional outcomes over time compared to CC users. Lung function decrease was significantly less in HTP users, while improvements in CAT scores, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure were significantly better compared to CC users.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that HTP users experienced it to a significantly lesser decrease in lung function compared to CC users, while demonstrating better improvements in other functional outcomes. The results of this study suggest that HTP might be a less deleterious alternative compared to CC in people with long history of CC use and who cannot quit smoking.