芯片多处理器光路由器的整体比较

Yaoyao Ye, Xiaowen Wu, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang, M. Nikdast, Xuan Wang
{"title":"芯片多处理器光路由器的整体比较","authors":"Yaoyao Ye, Xiaowen Wu, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang, M. Nikdast, Xuan Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network-on-chip (NoC) can improve the performance, power efficiency, and scalability of chip multiprocessors (CMPs). However, traditional NoCs using metallic interconnects consume a significant amount of power to deliver high communication bandwidth required in the near future. Optical NoCs are based on CMOS-compatible optical waveguides and optical routers, and promise significant bandwidth and power advantages. In this work, we review different designs of 5×5 and 4×4 optical routers for mesh or torus-based optical NoCs, and compare them for cost of optical resources and optical power loss. Besides, we use a 8×8 mesh-based optical NoC as a case study and analyze the thermal-induced power overhead while using different optical routers. Results show that the number of switching stages in an optical link directly affects the total optical power loss under thermal variations. By using passive-routing optical routers, the maximum number of switching stages in a XY-routing path is minimized to three, and the thermal-induced power overhead in the optical NoC is less than the matched networks using other routers.","PeriodicalId":408223,"journal":{"name":"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification","volume":"32 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holistic comparison of optical routers for chip multiprocessors\",\"authors\":\"Yaoyao Ye, Xiaowen Wu, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang, M. Nikdast, Xuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network-on-chip (NoC) can improve the performance, power efficiency, and scalability of chip multiprocessors (CMPs). However, traditional NoCs using metallic interconnects consume a significant amount of power to deliver high communication bandwidth required in the near future. Optical NoCs are based on CMOS-compatible optical waveguides and optical routers, and promise significant bandwidth and power advantages. In this work, we review different designs of 5×5 and 4×4 optical routers for mesh or torus-based optical NoCs, and compare them for cost of optical resources and optical power loss. Besides, we use a 8×8 mesh-based optical NoC as a case study and analyze the thermal-induced power overhead while using different optical routers. Results show that the number of switching stages in an optical link directly affects the total optical power loss under thermal variations. By using passive-routing optical routers, the maximum number of switching stages in a XY-routing path is minimized to three, and the thermal-induced power overhead in the optical NoC is less than the matched networks using other routers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification\",\"volume\":\"32 11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

片上网络(NoC)可以提高芯片多处理器(cmp)的性能、能效和可扩展性。然而,在不久的将来,使用金属互连的传统noc需要消耗大量的功率来提供所需的高通信带宽。光学noc基于cmos兼容的光波导和光路由器,具有显著的带宽和功耗优势。在这项工作中,我们回顾了5×5和4×4光路由器的不同设计,用于网状或环基光noc,并比较了它们的光资源成本和光功率损耗。此外,我们还以8×8网状光学NoC为例,分析了使用不同光路由器时的热致功率开销。结果表明,在热变化条件下,光链路中交换级的数目直接影响光功率的总损耗。通过使用无源路由光路由器,可以将xy路由路径中的最大交换级数减少到3个,并且光NoC中的热致功率开销小于使用其他路由器的匹配网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Holistic comparison of optical routers for chip multiprocessors
Network-on-chip (NoC) can improve the performance, power efficiency, and scalability of chip multiprocessors (CMPs). However, traditional NoCs using metallic interconnects consume a significant amount of power to deliver high communication bandwidth required in the near future. Optical NoCs are based on CMOS-compatible optical waveguides and optical routers, and promise significant bandwidth and power advantages. In this work, we review different designs of 5×5 and 4×4 optical routers for mesh or torus-based optical NoCs, and compare them for cost of optical resources and optical power loss. Besides, we use a 8×8 mesh-based optical NoC as a case study and analyze the thermal-induced power overhead while using different optical routers. Results show that the number of switching stages in an optical link directly affects the total optical power loss under thermal variations. By using passive-routing optical routers, the maximum number of switching stages in a XY-routing path is minimized to three, and the thermal-induced power overhead in the optical NoC is less than the matched networks using other routers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信