{"title":"工资的黄金法则","authors":"A. Young, Hernando Zuleta","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2329801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a neoclassical growth model where labor collectively chooses the labor share to maximize its steady-state wage rate. If the labor share increases relative to the competitive share, labor captures a larger share of a smaller total income. At a higher labor share the incentives to invest are lower and the steady-state capital to labor ratio is lower. We derive the golden rule of wages: set labor share equal to the elasticity of output with respect to labor. This is precisely the competitive outcome. We also consider the model with two types of labor: organized and unorganized. In this case, organized labor may choose a higher than competitive income share. Relative to the Cobb-Douglas case, when the elasticity of substitution is less than unity the chosen organized labor share is higher. We also analyze a version of the model that incorporates a tradeoff between collective bargaining opportunities and skill acquisition.","PeriodicalId":446687,"journal":{"name":"Universidad de los Andes Department of Economics Research Paper Series","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Golden Rules of Wages\",\"authors\":\"A. Young, Hernando Zuleta\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2329801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a neoclassical growth model where labor collectively chooses the labor share to maximize its steady-state wage rate. If the labor share increases relative to the competitive share, labor captures a larger share of a smaller total income. At a higher labor share the incentives to invest are lower and the steady-state capital to labor ratio is lower. We derive the golden rule of wages: set labor share equal to the elasticity of output with respect to labor. This is precisely the competitive outcome. We also consider the model with two types of labor: organized and unorganized. In this case, organized labor may choose a higher than competitive income share. Relative to the Cobb-Douglas case, when the elasticity of substitution is less than unity the chosen organized labor share is higher. We also analyze a version of the model that incorporates a tradeoff between collective bargaining opportunities and skill acquisition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universidad de los Andes Department of Economics Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universidad de los Andes Department of Economics Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universidad de los Andes Department of Economics Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider a neoclassical growth model where labor collectively chooses the labor share to maximize its steady-state wage rate. If the labor share increases relative to the competitive share, labor captures a larger share of a smaller total income. At a higher labor share the incentives to invest are lower and the steady-state capital to labor ratio is lower. We derive the golden rule of wages: set labor share equal to the elasticity of output with respect to labor. This is precisely the competitive outcome. We also consider the model with two types of labor: organized and unorganized. In this case, organized labor may choose a higher than competitive income share. Relative to the Cobb-Douglas case, when the elasticity of substitution is less than unity the chosen organized labor share is higher. We also analyze a version of the model that incorporates a tradeoff between collective bargaining opportunities and skill acquisition.