私人帝国:埃克森美孚和美国权力

William A. Mogel
{"title":"私人帝国:埃克森美孚和美国权力","authors":"William A. Mogel","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PRIVATE EMPIRE: EXXONMOBIL AND AMERICAN POWER By Steve Coll, Penguin Press 2012Readers of this Journal should be intrigued with Private Empire,1 which promises an inside look at ExxonMobil and how it acts like a sovereign (\"a corporate state within the American State\"),2 exercising its own \"foreign policy\" in 200 nations.3 Unfortunately, Private Empire does not deliver on its promise, breaks no new ground, nor produces evidence of corporate wrong-doing.4 Private Empire's nearly 700 pages and twenty-eight chapters are a wordy, anecdotal review of disparate incidents involving ExxonMobil in locales such as Alaska; Chad; Venezuela; Indonesia; Nigeria; and Jacksonville, Maryland.5This could have been a more compelling work, especially if it documented a rationale that international, leviathan corporations-energy or otherwise-deserve special government oversight. Private Empire doesn't prove its thesis that big is \"bad\" or offer a solution if there is an endemic problem with large, multinational corporations.6 Surprisingly, there is no discussion of the anti-trust laws or how ExxonMobil evolved from Standard Oil.7Stylistically, Private Empire tends to over-dramatize, assign pejorative meaning to terms like \"K Street\" and \"private jets,\" provide unneeded information about minor players (\"a descendant of an English cricket captain\"),8 and offer irrelevant information such as: the Saudi Ambassador's home in Beverly Hills was next to Drew Barrymore's9 or a description of the Japanese synthesizing pearls in Qatar.10Private Empire is also littered with purple prose and non-sequiturs, to wit:\"Alaska's storm-swept seas and icy glaciers might look forbidding, but at least they were situated in a nation that welcomed private capital.\"11Private Empire unsuccessfully searches for a villain. However, the best it comes up with is former CEO Lee Raymond, who, at worst, comes offas a curmudgeon who has a long friendship with Vice President Cheney. The author summarily concludes:\"Lee Raymond would manage Exxon's global position after 1989 as a confident sovereign, a peer of the White House's rotating occupants. Raymond aligned Exxon with America but he was not always in sync[.]\"12Private Empire makes no attempt to analyze the reasons for ExxonMobil's success. For example, in describing the company's lobbying in Washington, Private Empire glibly states:\"ExxonMobil's strategy was not so much to dazzle or manipulate Washington as to manage and outlast it.\"13According to the author, \"ExxonMobil did not want anything from the American government, but it did not want the government to do anything to the company, either.\"14 What does that \"insight\" mean?In conclusion, Private Empire may be on to something. Large, multinational corporations, particularly those that operate in essential industries, such as energy, and require large investments, may require special oversight by the government. …","PeriodicalId":359296,"journal":{"name":"The Energy Law Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Empire: Exxonmobil and American Power\",\"authors\":\"William A. Mogel\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-1560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PRIVATE EMPIRE: EXXONMOBIL AND AMERICAN POWER By Steve Coll, Penguin Press 2012Readers of this Journal should be intrigued with Private Empire,1 which promises an inside look at ExxonMobil and how it acts like a sovereign (\\\"a corporate state within the American State\\\"),2 exercising its own \\\"foreign policy\\\" in 200 nations.3 Unfortunately, Private Empire does not deliver on its promise, breaks no new ground, nor produces evidence of corporate wrong-doing.4 Private Empire's nearly 700 pages and twenty-eight chapters are a wordy, anecdotal review of disparate incidents involving ExxonMobil in locales such as Alaska; Chad; Venezuela; Indonesia; Nigeria; and Jacksonville, Maryland.5This could have been a more compelling work, especially if it documented a rationale that international, leviathan corporations-energy or otherwise-deserve special government oversight. Private Empire doesn't prove its thesis that big is \\\"bad\\\" or offer a solution if there is an endemic problem with large, multinational corporations.6 Surprisingly, there is no discussion of the anti-trust laws or how ExxonMobil evolved from Standard Oil.7Stylistically, Private Empire tends to over-dramatize, assign pejorative meaning to terms like \\\"K Street\\\" and \\\"private jets,\\\" provide unneeded information about minor players (\\\"a descendant of an English cricket captain\\\"),8 and offer irrelevant information such as: the Saudi Ambassador's home in Beverly Hills was next to Drew Barrymore's9 or a description of the Japanese synthesizing pearls in Qatar.10Private Empire is also littered with purple prose and non-sequiturs, to wit:\\\"Alaska's storm-swept seas and icy glaciers might look forbidding, but at least they were situated in a nation that welcomed private capital.\\\"11Private Empire unsuccessfully searches for a villain. However, the best it comes up with is former CEO Lee Raymond, who, at worst, comes offas a curmudgeon who has a long friendship with Vice President Cheney. The author summarily concludes:\\\"Lee Raymond would manage Exxon's global position after 1989 as a confident sovereign, a peer of the White House's rotating occupants. Raymond aligned Exxon with America but he was not always in sync[.]\\\"12Private Empire makes no attempt to analyze the reasons for ExxonMobil's success. For example, in describing the company's lobbying in Washington, Private Empire glibly states:\\\"ExxonMobil's strategy was not so much to dazzle or manipulate Washington as to manage and outlast it.\\\"13According to the author, \\\"ExxonMobil did not want anything from the American government, but it did not want the government to do anything to the company, either.\\\"14 What does that \\\"insight\\\" mean?In conclusion, Private Empire may be on to something. Large, multinational corporations, particularly those that operate in essential industries, such as energy, and require large investments, may require special oversight by the government. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":359296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Energy Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Energy Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-1560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Energy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-1560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

《私人帝国:埃克森美孚与美国权力》,作者:史蒂夫·科尔,企鹅出版社2012年出版,本杂志的读者应该对《私人帝国》感兴趣,该书承诺深入了解埃克森美孚,以及它如何像一个主权国家(“美国国家内部的一个企业国家”)一样行事,在200个国家实施自己的“外交政策”不幸的是,《私人帝国》没有兑现承诺,没有开辟新天地,也没有提供企业不法行为的证据《私人帝国》将近700页,28章,对埃克森美孚在阿拉斯加等地发生的不同事件进行了冗长的轶事式回顾;乍得;委内瑞拉;印尼;尼日利亚;这本可以是一项更引人注目的工作,特别是如果它证明了一个基本原理,即国际的、庞然大物般的公司——无论是能源公司还是其他行业——应该得到政府的特别监督。《私人帝国》并没有证明其“大即是坏”的论点,也没有提供解决大型跨国公司普遍存在的问题的方法令人惊讶的是,书中没有讨论反托拉斯法,也没有讨论埃克森美孚是如何从标准石油公司演变而来的。7在文体上,《私人帝国》倾向于过度戏剧化,给“K街”和“私人飞机”等术语赋予贬义,提供关于小角色的不必要信息(“英国板球队长的后裔”),8并提供不相关的信息,如:沙特大使在比佛利山庄的家就在德鲁·巴里摩尔的家旁边,还有一篇描述日本在卡塔尔合成珍珠的文章。《私人帝国》中也充斥着华丽的散文和不合事实的论述,比如:“阿拉斯加被风暴刮过的海洋和冰冷的冰川可能看起来令人畏惧,但至少它们坐落在一个欢迎私人资本的国家。”11私人帝国搜索反派失败然而,最好的是前首席执行官李·雷蒙德,他在最坏的情况下是一个与副总统切尼有着长期友谊的坏脾气。作者总结道:“1989年之后,李•雷蒙德将作为一个自信的主权国家,一个与白宫轮流入住者同等地位的人,管理埃克森美孚的全球地位。雷蒙德让埃克森美孚与美国结盟,但他并不总是步调一致。《私人帝国》没有试图分析埃克森美孚公司成功的原因。例如,在描述埃克森美孚在华盛顿的游说活动时,《私人帝国》圆滑地表示:“埃克森美孚的战略与其说是要让华盛顿眼花缭乱或操纵华盛顿,不如说是要管理华盛顿,让它活得更久。”13根据作者的说法,“埃克森美孚不希望从美国政府得到任何东西,但它也不希望政府对公司做任何事情。”这个“洞见”是什么意思?综上所述,《私人帝国》或许是有道理的。大型跨国公司,特别是那些在能源等重要行业经营并需要大量投资的跨国公司,可能需要政府的特别监督。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Empire: Exxonmobil and American Power
PRIVATE EMPIRE: EXXONMOBIL AND AMERICAN POWER By Steve Coll, Penguin Press 2012Readers of this Journal should be intrigued with Private Empire,1 which promises an inside look at ExxonMobil and how it acts like a sovereign ("a corporate state within the American State"),2 exercising its own "foreign policy" in 200 nations.3 Unfortunately, Private Empire does not deliver on its promise, breaks no new ground, nor produces evidence of corporate wrong-doing.4 Private Empire's nearly 700 pages and twenty-eight chapters are a wordy, anecdotal review of disparate incidents involving ExxonMobil in locales such as Alaska; Chad; Venezuela; Indonesia; Nigeria; and Jacksonville, Maryland.5This could have been a more compelling work, especially if it documented a rationale that international, leviathan corporations-energy or otherwise-deserve special government oversight. Private Empire doesn't prove its thesis that big is "bad" or offer a solution if there is an endemic problem with large, multinational corporations.6 Surprisingly, there is no discussion of the anti-trust laws or how ExxonMobil evolved from Standard Oil.7Stylistically, Private Empire tends to over-dramatize, assign pejorative meaning to terms like "K Street" and "private jets," provide unneeded information about minor players ("a descendant of an English cricket captain"),8 and offer irrelevant information such as: the Saudi Ambassador's home in Beverly Hills was next to Drew Barrymore's9 or a description of the Japanese synthesizing pearls in Qatar.10Private Empire is also littered with purple prose and non-sequiturs, to wit:"Alaska's storm-swept seas and icy glaciers might look forbidding, but at least they were situated in a nation that welcomed private capital."11Private Empire unsuccessfully searches for a villain. However, the best it comes up with is former CEO Lee Raymond, who, at worst, comes offas a curmudgeon who has a long friendship with Vice President Cheney. The author summarily concludes:"Lee Raymond would manage Exxon's global position after 1989 as a confident sovereign, a peer of the White House's rotating occupants. Raymond aligned Exxon with America but he was not always in sync[.]"12Private Empire makes no attempt to analyze the reasons for ExxonMobil's success. For example, in describing the company's lobbying in Washington, Private Empire glibly states:"ExxonMobil's strategy was not so much to dazzle or manipulate Washington as to manage and outlast it."13According to the author, "ExxonMobil did not want anything from the American government, but it did not want the government to do anything to the company, either."14 What does that "insight" mean?In conclusion, Private Empire may be on to something. Large, multinational corporations, particularly those that operate in essential industries, such as energy, and require large investments, may require special oversight by the government. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信