基于Borda方法的关联分类器排序规则

Maicon Dall'Agnol, Veronica Oliveira De Carvalho
{"title":"基于Borda方法的关联分类器排序规则","authors":"Maicon Dall'Agnol, Veronica Oliveira De Carvalho","doi":"10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10212078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Associative classifiers have been widely used in many domains due to their inherent interpretability. They are built in steps, one of them aimed at ranking the rules, usually performed through objective measures. Works aim to modify this step in order to obtain a classifier with better performance. Among them are those that use multiple measures simultaneously in order to consider different points of view for a given rule. However, these works present problems regarding execution time and interpretability. Here we show the use of ranking aggregation methods, specifically Borda’s methods, to rank the rules through a set of measures. Our results demonstrate that our solution is fast to execute and still guarantee the interpretability of the models, since they contain a statistically significant smaller number of rules.","PeriodicalId":121747,"journal":{"name":"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking Rules in Associative Classifiers via Borda’s Methods\",\"authors\":\"Maicon Dall'Agnol, Veronica Oliveira De Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10212078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Associative classifiers have been widely used in many domains due to their inherent interpretability. They are built in steps, one of them aimed at ranking the rules, usually performed through objective measures. Works aim to modify this step in order to obtain a classifier with better performance. Among them are those that use multiple measures simultaneously in order to consider different points of view for a given rule. However, these works present problems regarding execution time and interpretability. Here we show the use of ranking aggregation methods, specifically Borda’s methods, to rank the rules through a set of measures. Our results demonstrate that our solution is fast to execute and still guarantee the interpretability of the models, since they contain a statistically significant smaller number of rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10212078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI58278.2023.10212078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关联分类器由于其固有的可解释性,在许多领域得到了广泛的应用。它们是分步骤建立的,其中一个步骤旨在对规则进行排名,通常通过客观指标来执行。工作的目的是修改这一步,以获得更好的性能分类器。其中包括同时使用多个度量,以便考虑给定规则的不同观点。然而,这些工作在执行时间和可解释性方面存在问题。这里我们展示了使用排名聚合方法,特别是Borda的方法,通过一组度量对规则进行排名。我们的结果表明,我们的解决方案执行速度快,并且仍然保证模型的可解释性,因为它们包含的规则数量在统计上显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking Rules in Associative Classifiers via Borda’s Methods
Associative classifiers have been widely used in many domains due to their inherent interpretability. They are built in steps, one of them aimed at ranking the rules, usually performed through objective measures. Works aim to modify this step in order to obtain a classifier with better performance. Among them are those that use multiple measures simultaneously in order to consider different points of view for a given rule. However, these works present problems regarding execution time and interpretability. Here we show the use of ranking aggregation methods, specifically Borda’s methods, to rank the rules through a set of measures. Our results demonstrate that our solution is fast to execute and still guarantee the interpretability of the models, since they contain a statistically significant smaller number of rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信