面向增加业务流程模型的可比性:语义标准化功能的设计、实现和评估

Maria Shitkova, Nico Clever, J. Holler, J. Becker
{"title":"面向增加业务流程模型的可比性:语义标准化功能的设计、实现和评估","authors":"Maria Shitkova, Nico Clever, J. Holler, J. Becker","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business Process Management (BPM) has become a widespread practice in organizations. Companies use business process models to document their internal processes for training purposes, optimization, certification or requirements specification. However, as the modeling projects are often carried out by distributed teams of BPM experts, the resulting models may suffer from naming variability conflicts. Variability makes the created models difficult to understand, to automatically analyze and to re-use. In order to avoid these pitfalls, modeling guidelines, such as use of domain-specific glossary and verb-object phrase structures for element labels, were suggested. However, methodological and tool support is rarely provided. Moreover, no effectiveness studies of semantic standardization functionality were yet conducted. We close this research gap by presenting a strategy for the implementation of semantic standardization functionality and put particular attention on the evaluation of its implementation. As a result of the evaluation, we highlight design decisions, which have an effect on the comparability of process models. The study is of interest to both, academics and practitioners, who work in the area of process modeling and intend to increase process model comparability.","PeriodicalId":238097,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Increased Comparability of Business Process Models: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Semantic Standardization Functionality\",\"authors\":\"Maria Shitkova, Nico Clever, J. Holler, J. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBI.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business Process Management (BPM) has become a widespread practice in organizations. Companies use business process models to document their internal processes for training purposes, optimization, certification or requirements specification. However, as the modeling projects are often carried out by distributed teams of BPM experts, the resulting models may suffer from naming variability conflicts. Variability makes the created models difficult to understand, to automatically analyze and to re-use. In order to avoid these pitfalls, modeling guidelines, such as use of domain-specific glossary and verb-object phrase structures for element labels, were suggested. However, methodological and tool support is rarely provided. Moreover, no effectiveness studies of semantic standardization functionality were yet conducted. We close this research gap by presenting a strategy for the implementation of semantic standardization functionality and put particular attention on the evaluation of its implementation. As a result of the evaluation, we highlight design decisions, which have an effect on the comparability of process models. The study is of interest to both, academics and practitioners, who work in the area of process modeling and intend to increase process model comparability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

业务流程管理(BPM)已经成为组织中广泛的实践。公司使用业务流程模型来记录其内部流程,以用于培训、优化、认证或需求规范。然而,由于建模项目通常由BPM专家组成的分布式团队执行,因此生成的模型可能会受到命名可变性冲突的影响。可变性使得创建的模型难以理解,难以自动分析和重用。为了避免这些缺陷,建议使用建模指南,例如为元素标签使用特定于领域的术语表和动词-对象短语结构。然而,很少提供方法和工具支持。此外,语义标准化功能的有效性研究尚未开展。我们提出了一种实现语义标准化功能的策略,并特别关注其实现的评估,从而缩小了这一研究差距。作为评估的结果,我们强调了设计决策,它对过程模型的可比性有影响。对于在流程建模领域工作并打算提高流程模型可比性的学者和实践者来说,这项研究都很有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Increased Comparability of Business Process Models: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Semantic Standardization Functionality
Business Process Management (BPM) has become a widespread practice in organizations. Companies use business process models to document their internal processes for training purposes, optimization, certification or requirements specification. However, as the modeling projects are often carried out by distributed teams of BPM experts, the resulting models may suffer from naming variability conflicts. Variability makes the created models difficult to understand, to automatically analyze and to re-use. In order to avoid these pitfalls, modeling guidelines, such as use of domain-specific glossary and verb-object phrase structures for element labels, were suggested. However, methodological and tool support is rarely provided. Moreover, no effectiveness studies of semantic standardization functionality were yet conducted. We close this research gap by presenting a strategy for the implementation of semantic standardization functionality and put particular attention on the evaluation of its implementation. As a result of the evaluation, we highlight design decisions, which have an effect on the comparability of process models. The study is of interest to both, academics and practitioners, who work in the area of process modeling and intend to increase process model comparability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信