Sofia Wijkmark, Christina Olin-Scheller
{"title":"Hur blir en litteraturvetare litteraturdidaktiker?","authors":"Sofia Wijkmark, Christina Olin-Scheller","doi":"10.54797/tfl.v52i1.2212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can a Literary Scholar be Transformed Into a Literary Didact?: A Case Study on Competence Provision and Competence Development\nThis article highlights issues that deal with the relationship between comparative literature and literature in education. Our point of departure is a problem with competence maintenance within the subject of comparative literature in relation to teacher education. We address areas such as collaboration between comparative literature and literature in education and the role of thehumanities in the Swedish educational system. Previous publications on the relationship between comparative literature and literature in education, as well as interviews with active researchers, form the basis for a case study in which we do an overview of ways to acquire competence in literature in education. The context consists of local strategies, visions and perceptions of competence, as well as UKÄ’s (Swedish Higher Education Authority) national evaluations of subject teacher education in Swedish. Our results demonstrate that the fields have moved closer to each other in different ways, and we suggest that increased collaboration between comparative literature and literature in education  would be mutualy beneficial and that the specific expertise of both fields together would strengthen the role of teaching literature and the subject of Swedish in schools and teacher training. The results also indicate that it is crucial for literary scholars to approach issues related to literature in education in their research. A more literature-oriented didactic is needed when teaching future teachers to strengthen the students’ literary competence and raise questions about the meaning and function of literature – and humanities – in schools. The future professionalism (faglighet) of teachers in literary studies and literature in education should therefore focus on what unites the fields and be open to each other’s specific research competencies. Increased cooperation can contribute to strengthening the role of the humanities and Bildung in schools, above all by clarifying its importance for the future teachers that we teach.","PeriodicalId":202881,"journal":{"name":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v52i1.2212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文学学者如何转变为文学教育者?以比较文学与文学教育为例,探讨比较文学与文学教育的关系。我们的出发点是比较文学学科中与教师教育相关的能力维持问题。我们讨论的领域包括比较文学和文学在教育中的合作以及人文学科在瑞典教育体系中的作用。以前关于比较文学和教育文学之间关系的出版物,以及对活跃研究人员的采访,构成了一个案例研究的基础,在这个案例研究中,我们概述了如何获得教育文学的能力。背景包括地方战略,愿景和能力的看法,以及UKÄ(瑞典高等教育局)对瑞典学科教师教育的国家评估。我们的研究结果表明,这两个领域已经以不同的方式相互靠近,我们建议,比较文学和文学在教育领域之间增加合作将是互利的,这两个领域的特定专业知识将共同加强文学教学和瑞典语在学校和教师培训中的作用。研究结果还表明,文学学者在其研究中处理与文学教育有关的问题至关重要。在对未来教师的教学中,需要以文学为导向的教学,加强学生的文学能力,并对文学和人文学科在学校中的意义和功能提出质疑。因此,未来文学研究教师和文学教育教师的专业精神(faglighet)应该关注将这两个领域联系在一起的东西,并对彼此的特定研究能力持开放态度。加强合作有助于加强人文学科和教育在学校中的作用,首先是阐明人文学科对我们所教的未来教师的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hur blir en litteraturvetare litteraturdidaktiker?
How can a Literary Scholar be Transformed Into a Literary Didact?: A Case Study on Competence Provision and Competence Development This article highlights issues that deal with the relationship between comparative literature and literature in education. Our point of departure is a problem with competence maintenance within the subject of comparative literature in relation to teacher education. We address areas such as collaboration between comparative literature and literature in education and the role of thehumanities in the Swedish educational system. Previous publications on the relationship between comparative literature and literature in education, as well as interviews with active researchers, form the basis for a case study in which we do an overview of ways to acquire competence in literature in education. The context consists of local strategies, visions and perceptions of competence, as well as UKÄ’s (Swedish Higher Education Authority) national evaluations of subject teacher education in Swedish. Our results demonstrate that the fields have moved closer to each other in different ways, and we suggest that increased collaboration between comparative literature and literature in education  would be mutualy beneficial and that the specific expertise of both fields together would strengthen the role of teaching literature and the subject of Swedish in schools and teacher training. The results also indicate that it is crucial for literary scholars to approach issues related to literature in education in their research. A more literature-oriented didactic is needed when teaching future teachers to strengthen the students’ literary competence and raise questions about the meaning and function of literature – and humanities – in schools. The future professionalism (faglighet) of teachers in literary studies and literature in education should therefore focus on what unites the fields and be open to each other’s specific research competencies. Increased cooperation can contribute to strengthening the role of the humanities and Bildung in schools, above all by clarifying its importance for the future teachers that we teach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信