刑事程序的数字化:简化总是越好吗?

Oleksandr Halagan, I. Krytska, A. Tumanyants, Iryna Dubivka
{"title":"刑事程序的数字化:简化总是越好吗?","authors":"Oleksandr Halagan, I. Krytska, A. Tumanyants, Iryna Dubivka","doi":"10.7238/idp.v0i38.408495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on monitoring of current foreign criminal procedural legislation and its application, as well as scientists’ points of view, an analysis of the process of digitalization of criminal justice in some leading countries, in particular Ukraine, was carried out. The positive aspects of the systematic transfer of proceedings to digital mode were highlighted – optimization of pre-trial investigation and trial procedures, saving budget funds, reducing the number of authorized entities involved in certain procedural actions, applying effective methods of electronic communication, and so on. Risks include a lack of proper technological support and the threat of cyberattacks, intensification of abuse and falsification of evidence. Prospects for the development of digitalization have been determined in terms of interaction with electronic registers, the simplification of application transfer, petitions and complaints directly through the system of electronic cases and so on. Arguments are given on the expediency of applying an integrated approach to the implementation of the concept of electronic judicial proceedings, in particular the use of electronic document management and access to court cases in electronic form, the use of modern digital technologies in the implementation of procedural actions, and ensuring the proper recording of the trial by videoconference. It is emphasized that the basis of such digital innovations in the field of criminal justice should be the principle of humanism, that is, with human rights and legitimate interests as a priority.","PeriodicalId":235695,"journal":{"name":"IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitalization of the criminal process: is simplification always for the better?\",\"authors\":\"Oleksandr Halagan, I. Krytska, A. Tumanyants, Iryna Dubivka\",\"doi\":\"10.7238/idp.v0i38.408495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on monitoring of current foreign criminal procedural legislation and its application, as well as scientists’ points of view, an analysis of the process of digitalization of criminal justice in some leading countries, in particular Ukraine, was carried out. The positive aspects of the systematic transfer of proceedings to digital mode were highlighted – optimization of pre-trial investigation and trial procedures, saving budget funds, reducing the number of authorized entities involved in certain procedural actions, applying effective methods of electronic communication, and so on. Risks include a lack of proper technological support and the threat of cyberattacks, intensification of abuse and falsification of evidence. Prospects for the development of digitalization have been determined in terms of interaction with electronic registers, the simplification of application transfer, petitions and complaints directly through the system of electronic cases and so on. Arguments are given on the expediency of applying an integrated approach to the implementation of the concept of electronic judicial proceedings, in particular the use of electronic document management and access to court cases in electronic form, the use of modern digital technologies in the implementation of procedural actions, and ensuring the proper recording of the trial by videoconference. It is emphasized that the basis of such digital innovations in the field of criminal justice should be the principle of humanism, that is, with human rights and legitimate interests as a priority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i38.408495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i38.408495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对当前外国刑事诉讼立法及其适用情况进行监测的基础上,根据科学家的观点,对一些主要国家,特别是乌克兰的刑事司法数字化进程进行了分析。系统地将诉讼程序转移到数字模式的积极方面得到强调——优化审前调查和审判程序,节省预算资金,减少参与某些程序行动的授权实体的数量,采用有效的电子通信方法,等等。风险包括缺乏适当的技术支持和网络攻击的威胁,滥用和伪造证据的加剧。在与电子登记册的互动、简化申请转移、直接通过电子案件系统提出请愿和投诉等方面,已经确定了数字化发展的前景。提出了一些论点,说明采用综合办法执行电子司法程序概念的便利,特别是使用电子文件管理和以电子形式查阅法庭案件,在执行程序行动中使用现代数字技术,以及确保通过视像会议适当记录审判。会议强调,刑事司法领域的数字创新应以人道主义原则为基础,即优先考虑人权和合法利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitalization of the criminal process: is simplification always for the better?
Based on monitoring of current foreign criminal procedural legislation and its application, as well as scientists’ points of view, an analysis of the process of digitalization of criminal justice in some leading countries, in particular Ukraine, was carried out. The positive aspects of the systematic transfer of proceedings to digital mode were highlighted – optimization of pre-trial investigation and trial procedures, saving budget funds, reducing the number of authorized entities involved in certain procedural actions, applying effective methods of electronic communication, and so on. Risks include a lack of proper technological support and the threat of cyberattacks, intensification of abuse and falsification of evidence. Prospects for the development of digitalization have been determined in terms of interaction with electronic registers, the simplification of application transfer, petitions and complaints directly through the system of electronic cases and so on. Arguments are given on the expediency of applying an integrated approach to the implementation of the concept of electronic judicial proceedings, in particular the use of electronic document management and access to court cases in electronic form, the use of modern digital technologies in the implementation of procedural actions, and ensuring the proper recording of the trial by videoconference. It is emphasized that the basis of such digital innovations in the field of criminal justice should be the principle of humanism, that is, with human rights and legitimate interests as a priority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信