最优信号控制及流量不确定性的影响

C. Lan, Xiaojun Gu
{"title":"最优信号控制及流量不确定性的影响","authors":"C. Lan, Xiaojun Gu","doi":"10.1109/ITSC.2005.1520107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines effectiveness of a manual procedure for signal timing optimization, consisting of a modified Webster cycle length formulation applicable in saturated conditions and the equalized degree-of-saturation principle for green time allocation. Effects of statistical uncertainty of flows on control actions and delay performance are also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed procedure produces near-optimal delay performance, and performs as well as the state-of-the-art solution algorithms such as SOAP and TRANSYT with much less computation time. To evaluate effects of flow uncertainty, both stochastic mean and variance of control actions are derived based on approximation. The results show that approximations are reasonably accurate. Magnitude of changes in control actions relative to their means is linearly related to magnitude of statistical uncertainty in arrival flows. The control actions, especially cycle lengths, are less sensitive to flow uncertainty in saturated conditions. Delay performance is subjected to both direct and indirect effects from flow uncertainty. The stochastic mean of delay is always greater than the deterministic mean, indicating that ignoring flow uncertainty will substantially underestimate delay if degree of uncertainty is significant. When control actions are composed based on the actual flows, the mean of stochastic delay will reduce significantly, confirming that the adaptive control is much effective than the deterministic control. The Monte-Carlo simulation study also shows that if control actions deviate more than 3% to 7% from the perfect state, delay performance will substantially deteriorate. Error in flow predictions will affect the effectiveness of control actions and, consequently, delay performance. This study shows that the adverse effect of error in flow prediction on delay is slightly less than the imperfect controls. The margin of error in flow predictions, ranging from 4% to 10%, increases as the flow uncertainty grows.","PeriodicalId":153203,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal signal controls and effects of flow uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"C. Lan, Xiaojun Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITSC.2005.1520107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines effectiveness of a manual procedure for signal timing optimization, consisting of a modified Webster cycle length formulation applicable in saturated conditions and the equalized degree-of-saturation principle for green time allocation. Effects of statistical uncertainty of flows on control actions and delay performance are also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed procedure produces near-optimal delay performance, and performs as well as the state-of-the-art solution algorithms such as SOAP and TRANSYT with much less computation time. To evaluate effects of flow uncertainty, both stochastic mean and variance of control actions are derived based on approximation. The results show that approximations are reasonably accurate. Magnitude of changes in control actions relative to their means is linearly related to magnitude of statistical uncertainty in arrival flows. The control actions, especially cycle lengths, are less sensitive to flow uncertainty in saturated conditions. Delay performance is subjected to both direct and indirect effects from flow uncertainty. The stochastic mean of delay is always greater than the deterministic mean, indicating that ignoring flow uncertainty will substantially underestimate delay if degree of uncertainty is significant. When control actions are composed based on the actual flows, the mean of stochastic delay will reduce significantly, confirming that the adaptive control is much effective than the deterministic control. The Monte-Carlo simulation study also shows that if control actions deviate more than 3% to 7% from the perfect state, delay performance will substantially deteriorate. Error in flow predictions will affect the effectiveness of control actions and, consequently, delay performance. This study shows that the adverse effect of error in flow prediction on delay is slightly less than the imperfect controls. The margin of error in flow predictions, ranging from 4% to 10%, increases as the flow uncertainty grows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2005.1520107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2005.1520107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究考察了信号时序优化的手动程序的有效性,该程序包括适用于饱和条件的修改的韦伯斯特周期长度公式和绿色时间分配的均衡饱和度原则。研究了流的统计不确定性对控制行为和延迟性能的影响。结果表明,所提出的过程产生了近乎最优的延迟性能,并且在计算时间少得多的情况下,与SOAP和TRANSYT等最先进的解决方案算法一样出色。为了评估流量不确定性的影响,在近似的基础上推导了控制作用的随机均值和方差。结果表明,该近似具有相当的精度。控制行动相对于其均值的变化幅度与到达流量的统计不确定性幅度呈线性关系。在饱和条件下,控制动作,特别是周期长度,对流量不确定性不太敏感。延迟性能受到流量不确定性的直接和间接影响。延迟的随机平均值总是大于确定性平均值,这表明如果不确定性程度很大,忽略流的不确定性将大大低估延迟。当根据实际流组成控制动作时,随机延迟均值显著减小,证明自适应控制比确定性控制更有效。Monte-Carlo仿真研究还表明,如果控制动作偏离完美状态超过3% ~ 7%,则延迟性能将大幅下降。流量预测中的错误将影响控制动作的有效性,从而影响延迟性能。研究表明,流量预测误差对延迟的不利影响略小于不完善控制。随着流量不确定性的增加,流量预测的误差范围从4%到10%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal signal controls and effects of flow uncertainty
This study examines effectiveness of a manual procedure for signal timing optimization, consisting of a modified Webster cycle length formulation applicable in saturated conditions and the equalized degree-of-saturation principle for green time allocation. Effects of statistical uncertainty of flows on control actions and delay performance are also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed procedure produces near-optimal delay performance, and performs as well as the state-of-the-art solution algorithms such as SOAP and TRANSYT with much less computation time. To evaluate effects of flow uncertainty, both stochastic mean and variance of control actions are derived based on approximation. The results show that approximations are reasonably accurate. Magnitude of changes in control actions relative to their means is linearly related to magnitude of statistical uncertainty in arrival flows. The control actions, especially cycle lengths, are less sensitive to flow uncertainty in saturated conditions. Delay performance is subjected to both direct and indirect effects from flow uncertainty. The stochastic mean of delay is always greater than the deterministic mean, indicating that ignoring flow uncertainty will substantially underestimate delay if degree of uncertainty is significant. When control actions are composed based on the actual flows, the mean of stochastic delay will reduce significantly, confirming that the adaptive control is much effective than the deterministic control. The Monte-Carlo simulation study also shows that if control actions deviate more than 3% to 7% from the perfect state, delay performance will substantially deteriorate. Error in flow predictions will affect the effectiveness of control actions and, consequently, delay performance. This study shows that the adverse effect of error in flow prediction on delay is slightly less than the imperfect controls. The margin of error in flow predictions, ranging from 4% to 10%, increases as the flow uncertainty grows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信