利用模拟脑电图数据评价不同皮质电位成像方法

Jun Yao, J. Dewald
{"title":"利用模拟脑电图数据评价不同皮质电位成像方法","authors":"Jun Yao, J. Dewald","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different cortical potential imaging methods have been developed to directly link the scalp potentials with the cortical potentials. These methods make it possible to non-invasively investigate cortical activities with high spatial and time resolutions by using scalp EEG. However, although there are many different cortical potential imaging methods available, up to now, the accuracy and efficiency of these methods have not been rigorously evaluated nor compared. In this paper, we investigated a total of five different methods using ten different scenarios that employ simulated scalp EEG data with or without noise. Our results showed that 1), when only the center of electrical cortical activity needs to be estimated, single moving dipole and single dipole deviation scan methods are more accurate and more efficient than current density methods; and 2), with respect to current density methods, which are useful when the number of sources are unknown, the LORETA method with the L1-norm gives the highest accuracy, however, at a significant computational cost.","PeriodicalId":258551,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different cortical potential imaging methods using simulated EEG data\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yao, J. Dewald\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different cortical potential imaging methods have been developed to directly link the scalp potentials with the cortical potentials. These methods make it possible to non-invasively investigate cortical activities with high spatial and time resolutions by using scalp EEG. However, although there are many different cortical potential imaging methods available, up to now, the accuracy and efficiency of these methods have not been rigorously evaluated nor compared. In this paper, we investigated a total of five different methods using ten different scenarios that employ simulated scalp EEG data with or without noise. Our results showed that 1), when only the center of electrical cortical activity needs to be estimated, single moving dipole and single dipole deviation scan methods are more accurate and more efficient than current density methods; and 2), with respect to current density methods, which are useful when the number of sources are unknown, the LORETA method with the L1-norm gives the highest accuracy, however, at a significant computational cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1280159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

不同的皮层电位成像方法已经发展到将头皮电位与皮层电位直接联系起来。这些方法使得利用头皮脑电图对皮层活动进行高空间和时间分辨率的无创研究成为可能。然而,尽管有许多不同的皮质电位成像方法,但迄今为止,这些方法的准确性和效率尚未得到严格的评估和比较。在本文中,我们研究了五种不同的方法,使用十种不同的场景,使用模拟头皮EEG数据有或没有噪声。结果表明:1)当只需要估计皮层电活动中心时,单移动偶极子和单偶极子偏差扫描方法比电流密度法更准确、更有效;2)相对于电流密度方法,它在源数量未知时很有用,具有l1范数的LORETA方法给出了最高的精度,然而,在很大的计算成本上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different cortical potential imaging methods using simulated EEG data
Different cortical potential imaging methods have been developed to directly link the scalp potentials with the cortical potentials. These methods make it possible to non-invasively investigate cortical activities with high spatial and time resolutions by using scalp EEG. However, although there are many different cortical potential imaging methods available, up to now, the accuracy and efficiency of these methods have not been rigorously evaluated nor compared. In this paper, we investigated a total of five different methods using ten different scenarios that employ simulated scalp EEG data with or without noise. Our results showed that 1), when only the center of electrical cortical activity needs to be estimated, single moving dipole and single dipole deviation scan methods are more accurate and more efficient than current density methods; and 2), with respect to current density methods, which are useful when the number of sources are unknown, the LORETA method with the L1-norm gives the highest accuracy, however, at a significant computational cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信