教师专业教育中数学教与学的比较研究:了解分区学校学生的数学概念

H. E. Chrisnawati, G. Pramesti, Y. Kuswardi
{"title":"教师专业教育中数学教与学的比较研究:了解分区学校学生的数学概念","authors":"H. E. Chrisnawati, G. Pramesti, Y. Kuswardi","doi":"10.1063/1.5139749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the tests. From the results of the study, it can be found that the average understanding of mathematical concepts of students using DLwith recitation has a better effect on understanding students’ mathematical concept. In contrast, TGTs’ class produce the lowest understanding students’ mathematical concepts while the most varied understanding students’ mathematical concepts are in the NHTs’ class.The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the ...","PeriodicalId":246056,"journal":{"name":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on mathematics teaching and learning in teacher professional education programs: Understanding students’ mathematical concepts in zoning school\",\"authors\":\"H. E. Chrisnawati, G. Pramesti, Y. Kuswardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.5139749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the tests. From the results of the study, it can be found that the average understanding of mathematical concepts of students using DLwith recitation has a better effect on understanding students’ mathematical concept. In contrast, TGTs’ class produce the lowest understanding students’ mathematical concepts while the most varied understanding students’ mathematical concepts are in the NHTs’ class.The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":246056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择合适的学习模式是非常重要的,因为它可以使教学活动的过程更有意义。教师专业教育课程期望实践者能够根据课堂情况选择合适的学习模式。即使在实行分区制度的学校,也就是公立初中。本文旨在找出泗水5公立初中教师专业教育计划在理解学生数学概念方面所使用的四种学习模式的描述和比较。研究中使用的学习模式有数字头脑学习(NHT)、背诵式发现学习(DL)、基于问题的学习(PBL)和团队游戏(TGT)。本研究的方法采用描述性和推论性统计。因此,推论统计分析采用单向方差分析。数据是理解学生的数学概念,是通过测试获得的。从研究结果可以发现,使用DLwith背诵的学生对数学概念的平均理解对理解学生的数学概念有更好的效果。相比之下,高智商组的学生对数学概念的理解程度最低,而高智商组的学生对数学概念的理解程度最高。选择合适的学习模式是非常重要的,因为它可以使教学活动的过程更有意义。教师专业教育课程期望实践者能够根据课堂情况选择合适的学习模式。即使在实行分区制度的学校,也就是公立初中。本文旨在找出泗水5公立初中教师专业教育计划在理解学生数学概念方面所使用的四种学习模式的描述和比较。研究中使用的学习模式有数字头脑学习(NHT)、背诵式发现学习(DL)、基于问题的学习(PBL)和团队游戏(TGT)。本研究的方法采用描述性和推论性统计。因此,推论统计分析采用单向方差分析。数据是理解学生的数学概念得到的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on mathematics teaching and learning in teacher professional education programs: Understanding students’ mathematical concepts in zoning school
The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the tests. From the results of the study, it can be found that the average understanding of mathematical concepts of students using DLwith recitation has a better effect on understanding students’ mathematical concept. In contrast, TGTs’ class produce the lowest understanding students’ mathematical concepts while the most varied understanding students’ mathematical concepts are in the NHTs’ class.The selection of the appropriate learning model is very important because it can make more meaning in the process of teaching and learning activities. Teacher Professional Education Program expects the practitioner to be able to choose appropriate learning model to the class conditions. Even in schools that have implemented a zoning system, namely public junior high school 5 Surakarta. This paper aims to find out the description and comparison of the four learning models used by Teacher Professional Education Program at public junior high school 5 Surakarta towards understanding students’ mathematical concepts. The learning model used in the research were Number Head Together (NHT), Discovery Learning (DL) with recitation, Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Teams games Together (TGT). The methodology of this research uses descriptive and inferential statistics. Thus, inferential statistical analysis using one-way variance analysis. Data are understanding students’ mathematical concepts were obtained by the ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信