缓和和临终关怀的卫生服务研究

T. Smets, L. Deliens
{"title":"缓和和临终关怀的卫生服务研究","authors":"T. Smets, L. Deliens","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clear information about the effectiveness of services and interventions is often lacking in palliative care service planning. The development of palliative care services and interventions should be based on evidence that they will increase the likelihood of desired outcomes, but also understanding the process of the intervention and how it might work in practice are vital in building an evidence base that informs policy and practice. Health services research in palliative care covers topics such as palliative care needs, access to palliative care, quality of care and feasibility, effectiveness, and cost of palliative care services and interventions. Patients needing palliative care often have complex needs and require complex services and interventions. The Medical Research Council guidance for developing, evaluating, and implementing complex interventions, the MORECare statement on ‘best practice’ methods for research evaluating end of life care, and the Medical Research Council guidance on process evaluation offer useful support for researchers undertaking health services research. To evaluate complex services and interventions, a wide ranch of study designs can be used. Studies that enrol patients with advanced illness present unique challenges, both ethical and methodological.","PeriodicalId":369448,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health services research in palliative and end of life care\",\"authors\":\"T. Smets, L. Deliens\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clear information about the effectiveness of services and interventions is often lacking in palliative care service planning. The development of palliative care services and interventions should be based on evidence that they will increase the likelihood of desired outcomes, but also understanding the process of the intervention and how it might work in practice are vital in building an evidence base that informs policy and practice. Health services research in palliative care covers topics such as palliative care needs, access to palliative care, quality of care and feasibility, effectiveness, and cost of palliative care services and interventions. Patients needing palliative care often have complex needs and require complex services and interventions. The Medical Research Council guidance for developing, evaluating, and implementing complex interventions, the MORECare statement on ‘best practice’ methods for research evaluating end of life care, and the Medical Research Council guidance on process evaluation offer useful support for researchers undertaking health services research. To evaluate complex services and interventions, a wide ranch of study designs can be used. Studies that enrol patients with advanced illness present unique challenges, both ethical and methodological.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在姑息治疗服务规划中,往往缺乏有关服务和干预措施有效性的明确信息。姑息治疗服务和干预措施的发展应以证据为基础,证明它们将增加实现预期结果的可能性,但了解干预过程及其在实践中如何发挥作用,对于建立为政策和实践提供信息的证据基础至关重要。关于姑息治疗的卫生服务研究涵盖了诸如姑息治疗需求、获得姑息治疗、护理质量和可行性、有效性以及姑息治疗服务和干预措施的成本等主题。需要姑息治疗的患者往往有复杂的需求,需要复杂的服务和干预措施。医学研究理事会关于制定、评估和实施复杂干预措施的指南,mocare关于评估临终关怀研究的“最佳实践”方法的声明,以及医学研究理事会关于过程评估的指南,为从事卫生服务研究的研究人员提供了有用的支持。为了评估复杂的服务和干预措施,可以使用广泛的研究设计。纳入晚期疾病患者的研究在伦理和方法上都面临着独特的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health services research in palliative and end of life care
Clear information about the effectiveness of services and interventions is often lacking in palliative care service planning. The development of palliative care services and interventions should be based on evidence that they will increase the likelihood of desired outcomes, but also understanding the process of the intervention and how it might work in practice are vital in building an evidence base that informs policy and practice. Health services research in palliative care covers topics such as palliative care needs, access to palliative care, quality of care and feasibility, effectiveness, and cost of palliative care services and interventions. Patients needing palliative care often have complex needs and require complex services and interventions. The Medical Research Council guidance for developing, evaluating, and implementing complex interventions, the MORECare statement on ‘best practice’ methods for research evaluating end of life care, and the Medical Research Council guidance on process evaluation offer useful support for researchers undertaking health services research. To evaluate complex services and interventions, a wide ranch of study designs can be used. Studies that enrol patients with advanced illness present unique challenges, both ethical and methodological.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信