完全子宫破裂是现代产科的耻辱:一项观察性研究

Naina Kumar, Ashu Yadav
{"title":"完全子宫破裂是现代产科的耻辱:一项观察性研究","authors":"Naina Kumar, Ashu Yadav","doi":"10.2174/1573404817999201230234732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTo know the and maternal and perinatal outcome in women with complete uterine rupture. Background:\nUterine rupture is a catastrophic obstetric event associated with high maternal, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Objectives:\nThe present study was conducted to know prevalence, risk factors, presentation, maternal, perinatal outcome in women with\ncomplete uterine rupture.\n\n\n\nPresent retrospective observational study was conducted on 31 women admitted to Obstetrics ward of rural\ntertiary center of Northern India with complete uterine rupture between January 2016 and December 2018 after Institutional\nethical committee approval and informed written consent from participants. Data included socio-demographic parameters,\ngestation, predisposing factors, clinical features, site of rupture, associated bladder injury, need for hysterectomy, perinatal\nand maternal outcome. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 22.0.\n\n\n\nOf total 9,156 deliveries during study period 31 women had uterine rupture, indicating prevalence of 0.34%. Of\nall, 21(67.7%) women had unscarred uterine rupture and 10(32.3%) scarred uterine rupture. Majority cases were un-booked\n(77.4%), multiparous (90.3%) and term at gestation (66.7%) with an average age of all cases as 26.97±3.73 years. Most\ncommon risk factor was injudicious use of oxytocic (29.0%) and previous cesarean section scar (22.6%). Most common site\nof unscarred uterine rupture was lower uterine segment (26.7%) and in scarred uterus, site of previous cesarean section\n(26.7%). Eight (25.8%) women had bladder injury. Total 24(77.4%) fetuses were stillborn. Seventeen (54.8%) women\nneeded hysterectomy as lifesaving procedure and three (9.7%) succumbed to death despite of all resuscitative measures.\n\n\n\nHence, complete uterine rupture is common in rural areas and is serious obstetric emergency with high\nperinatal, maternal morbidity and mortality. Other: As most of the cases of complete uterine rupture occur in unbooked\nwomen, hence, motivating all antenatal women for regular antenatal visits can prevent the dreadful condition to a large\nextent, thereby saving many maternal and fetal lives.\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complete Uterine Rupture a Stigma for Modern Obstetrics: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Naina Kumar, Ashu Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404817999201230234732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nTo know the and maternal and perinatal outcome in women with complete uterine rupture. Background:\\nUterine rupture is a catastrophic obstetric event associated with high maternal, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Objectives:\\nThe present study was conducted to know prevalence, risk factors, presentation, maternal, perinatal outcome in women with\\ncomplete uterine rupture.\\n\\n\\n\\nPresent retrospective observational study was conducted on 31 women admitted to Obstetrics ward of rural\\ntertiary center of Northern India with complete uterine rupture between January 2016 and December 2018 after Institutional\\nethical committee approval and informed written consent from participants. Data included socio-demographic parameters,\\ngestation, predisposing factors, clinical features, site of rupture, associated bladder injury, need for hysterectomy, perinatal\\nand maternal outcome. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 22.0.\\n\\n\\n\\nOf total 9,156 deliveries during study period 31 women had uterine rupture, indicating prevalence of 0.34%. Of\\nall, 21(67.7%) women had unscarred uterine rupture and 10(32.3%) scarred uterine rupture. Majority cases were un-booked\\n(77.4%), multiparous (90.3%) and term at gestation (66.7%) with an average age of all cases as 26.97±3.73 years. Most\\ncommon risk factor was injudicious use of oxytocic (29.0%) and previous cesarean section scar (22.6%). Most common site\\nof unscarred uterine rupture was lower uterine segment (26.7%) and in scarred uterus, site of previous cesarean section\\n(26.7%). Eight (25.8%) women had bladder injury. Total 24(77.4%) fetuses were stillborn. Seventeen (54.8%) women\\nneeded hysterectomy as lifesaving procedure and three (9.7%) succumbed to death despite of all resuscitative measures.\\n\\n\\n\\nHence, complete uterine rupture is common in rural areas and is serious obstetric emergency with high\\nperinatal, maternal morbidity and mortality. Other: As most of the cases of complete uterine rupture occur in unbooked\\nwomen, hence, motivating all antenatal women for regular antenatal visits can prevent the dreadful condition to a large\\nextent, thereby saving many maternal and fetal lives.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817999201230234732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817999201230234732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解完全性子宫破裂妇女的母婴结局。背景:子宫破裂是一种灾难性的产科事件,与高产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率相关。目的:了解完全性子宫破裂的发生率、危险因素、临床表现、产妇及围产儿结局。本回顾性观察研究是在2016年1月至2018年12月期间,经机构伦理委员会批准并获得参与者知情书面同意后,在印度北部农村替代中心产科病房收治的31名完全子宫破裂的女性。数据包括社会人口学参数、妊娠、易感因素、临床特征、破裂部位、相关膀胱损伤、子宫切除术需求、围产期和产妇结局。统计分析使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences软件版本22.0进行。在研究期间的9156例分娩中,31例发生子宫破裂,患病率为0.34%。其中,无瘢痕子宫破裂21例(67.7%),瘢痕子宫破裂10例(32.3%)。以未预约(77.4%)、多产(90.3%)、足月(66.7%)居多,平均年龄26.97±3.73岁。最常见的危险因素是不明智使用催产素(29.0%)和既往剖宫产疤痕(22.6%)。无瘢痕子宫破裂的最常见部位为子宫下段(26.7%),瘢痕子宫破裂的最常见部位为既往剖宫产部位(26.7%)。8例(25.8%)发生膀胱损伤。死产24例(77.4%)。17名(54.8%)妇女需要子宫切除术作为挽救生命的手术,3名(9.7%)妇女在采取所有复苏措施后死亡。因此,子宫完全破裂在农村地区很常见,是一种严重的产科急诊,具有较高的围产期、产妇发病率和死亡率。其他:由于大多数完全子宫破裂的病例发生在未预约的妇女身上,因此,鼓励所有产前妇女定期产前检查可以在很大程度上预防这种可怕的情况,从而挽救许多母亲和胎儿的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complete Uterine Rupture a Stigma for Modern Obstetrics: An Observational Study
To know the and maternal and perinatal outcome in women with complete uterine rupture. Background: Uterine rupture is a catastrophic obstetric event associated with high maternal, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Objectives: The present study was conducted to know prevalence, risk factors, presentation, maternal, perinatal outcome in women with complete uterine rupture. Present retrospective observational study was conducted on 31 women admitted to Obstetrics ward of rural tertiary center of Northern India with complete uterine rupture between January 2016 and December 2018 after Institutional ethical committee approval and informed written consent from participants. Data included socio-demographic parameters, gestation, predisposing factors, clinical features, site of rupture, associated bladder injury, need for hysterectomy, perinatal and maternal outcome. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 22.0. Of total 9,156 deliveries during study period 31 women had uterine rupture, indicating prevalence of 0.34%. Of all, 21(67.7%) women had unscarred uterine rupture and 10(32.3%) scarred uterine rupture. Majority cases were un-booked (77.4%), multiparous (90.3%) and term at gestation (66.7%) with an average age of all cases as 26.97±3.73 years. Most common risk factor was injudicious use of oxytocic (29.0%) and previous cesarean section scar (22.6%). Most common site of unscarred uterine rupture was lower uterine segment (26.7%) and in scarred uterus, site of previous cesarean section (26.7%). Eight (25.8%) women had bladder injury. Total 24(77.4%) fetuses were stillborn. Seventeen (54.8%) women needed hysterectomy as lifesaving procedure and three (9.7%) succumbed to death despite of all resuscitative measures. Hence, complete uterine rupture is common in rural areas and is serious obstetric emergency with high perinatal, maternal morbidity and mortality. Other: As most of the cases of complete uterine rupture occur in unbooked women, hence, motivating all antenatal women for regular antenatal visits can prevent the dreadful condition to a large extent, thereby saving many maternal and fetal lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信