统计因素资产定价模型与四因素模型

V. Santana, Alex A. T. Rathke
{"title":"统计因素资产定价模型与四因素模型","authors":"V. Santana, Alex A. T. Rathke","doi":"10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor\n asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform\n a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using\n data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the\n two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the\n cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models\n generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series\n analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension,\n neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not\n able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we\n consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor\n model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models\n can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in\n the Brazilian stock market.","PeriodicalId":152637,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Review of Finance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Statistical Factor Asset Pricing Model Versus the 4-Factor\\n Model\",\"authors\":\"V. Santana, Alex A. T. Rathke\",\"doi\":\"10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor\\n asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform\\n a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using\\n data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the\\n two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the\\n cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models\\n generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series\\n analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension,\\n neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not\\n able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we\\n consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor\\n model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models\\n can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in\\n the Brazilian stock market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Review of Finance\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Review of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较统计因子资产定价模型与Fama-French-Carhart四因子模型的绩效。本文采用主成分分析(PCA)对2001年至2015年在B3上市的股票进行潜在风险因素提取。我们测试了两个模型在时间序列和横截面维度上解释资产回报的能力。我们发现,在时间序列分析中,统计因子模型产生的异常收益具有统计显著性,而四因子模型则没有。在横截面维度上,两种模型均不能产生显著的异常收益,但也不能产生正的风险溢价。如果我们考虑不同的时间和资产集,也会发现类似的结果。因此,虽然4因素模型在这组检验中表现稍好,但不能认为这两种模型都完全足以解释巴西股市的资产预期收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Statistical Factor Asset Pricing Model Versus the 4-Factor Model
This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension, neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in the Brazilian stock market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信