{"title":"统计因素资产定价模型与四因素模型","authors":"V. Santana, Alex A. T. Rathke","doi":"10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor\n asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform\n a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using\n data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the\n two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the\n cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models\n generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series\n analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension,\n neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not\n able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we\n consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor\n model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models\n can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in\n the Brazilian stock market.","PeriodicalId":152637,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Review of Finance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Statistical Factor Asset Pricing Model Versus the 4-Factor\\n Model\",\"authors\":\"V. Santana, Alex A. T. Rathke\",\"doi\":\"10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor\\n asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform\\n a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using\\n data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the\\n two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the\\n cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models\\n generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series\\n analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension,\\n neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not\\n able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we\\n consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor\\n model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models\\n can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in\\n the Brazilian stock market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Review of Finance\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Review of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Review of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/RBFIN.V16N4.2018.67393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Statistical Factor Asset Pricing Model Versus the 4-Factor
Model
This research aims to compare the performance of a statistical factor
asset pricing model with the Fama-French-Carhart 4-factor model. We perform
a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to extract latent risk factors using
data of stocks listed on B3 from 2001 to 2015. We test the abilities of the
two models to explain assets' returns both in the time-series and in the
cross-section dimension. We found that the statistical factor models
generates statistically significant abnormal returns in the time-series
analysis while the 4-factor model does not. In the cross section dimension,
neither model generates significant abnormal returns but they also are not
able to generate positive risk premia. Similar results are found if we
consider different sets of time and assets. Therefore, although the 4-factor
model performs slightly better in the set of tests, neither of the models
can be considered fully adequate to explain expected returns of assets in
the Brazilian stock market.