保护工作中的举报人:英国和南非立法影响的比较

D. Lewis, T. Uys
{"title":"保护工作中的举报人:英国和南非立法影响的比较","authors":"D. Lewis, T. Uys","doi":"10.1108/03090550710816492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The paper proposes to compare the relative success of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (UK) and the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 (South Africa) in providing protection for whistleblowers in the UK and South Africa.Design/methodology/approach – The assessment is conducted in the light of case law in both countries and empirical research previously conducted.Findings – The most important feature of the relevant statutes in both countries is that they recognise the need to protect workers who disclose in the public interest. Although the current provisions are important first steps, it is believed that much more needs to be done.Practical implications – In the light of this research, 14 suggestions are made for change.Originality/value – The article makes proposals for reform to the legislation in both countries. It also attempts to provide guidance to practitioners by identifying good practice in handling concerns about wrongdoing.","PeriodicalId":447231,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting whistleblowers at work: A comparison of the impact of British and South African legislation\",\"authors\":\"D. Lewis, T. Uys\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/03090550710816492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The paper proposes to compare the relative success of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (UK) and the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 (South Africa) in providing protection for whistleblowers in the UK and South Africa.Design/methodology/approach – The assessment is conducted in the light of case law in both countries and empirical research previously conducted.Findings – The most important feature of the relevant statutes in both countries is that they recognise the need to protect workers who disclose in the public interest. Although the current provisions are important first steps, it is believed that much more needs to be done.Practical implications – In the light of this research, 14 suggestions are made for change.Originality/value – The article makes proposals for reform to the legislation in both countries. It also attempts to provide guidance to practitioners by identifying good practice in handling concerns about wrongdoing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550710816492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550710816492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

目的-本文建议比较1998年《公共利益披露法》(英国)和2000年《受保护披露法》(南非)在为英国和南非的举报人提供保护方面的相对成功。设计/方法论/方法-评估是根据两国的判例法和之前进行的实证研究进行的。调查结果——两国相关法规最重要的特点是,它们承认有必要保护出于公共利益披露信息的工人。虽然目前的规定是重要的第一步,但相信还需要做更多的工作。实际意义-根据这项研究,提出了14条改变的建议。原创性/价值——文章对两国的立法改革提出了建议。它还试图通过确定处理不当行为的良好做法,为从业人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protecting whistleblowers at work: A comparison of the impact of British and South African legislation
Purpose – The paper proposes to compare the relative success of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (UK) and the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 (South Africa) in providing protection for whistleblowers in the UK and South Africa.Design/methodology/approach – The assessment is conducted in the light of case law in both countries and empirical research previously conducted.Findings – The most important feature of the relevant statutes in both countries is that they recognise the need to protect workers who disclose in the public interest. Although the current provisions are important first steps, it is believed that much more needs to be done.Practical implications – In the light of this research, 14 suggestions are made for change.Originality/value – The article makes proposals for reform to the legislation in both countries. It also attempts to provide guidance to practitioners by identifying good practice in handling concerns about wrongdoing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信