公正原则在俄罗斯刑法中的适用及其实施问题

O. Gorodnova
{"title":"公正原则在俄罗斯刑法中的适用及其实施问题","authors":"O. Gorodnova","doi":"10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of different aspects of the principle of justice in criminal law equalizing and distributing on the basis of the analysis of philosophical and legal thought. The substantiation of the supremacy of the principle of justice is presented. Other criminal law principles (criminal responsibility, humanism, equality of citizens before the law and the court) are analyzed as auxiliary, fully realizing the justice of the law and punishment. The connection between the principles of justice and legality, equality of citizens before the law and humanism, guilty responsibility is demonstrated. It is concluded that the equality of citizens before the law and humanism are different aspects of justice. Under the influence of the principle of justice, a circle of criminal acts is formed. A fair procedure for bringing guilty persons to criminal responsibility is based on strict observance of the principle of guilt, humane attitude to the guilty. \nThe article analyzes certain provisions of criminal legislation for compliance with the principle of justice, considers the procedure for implementing legal principles in practice. In order to substantiate the conclusions of the study, a violation of the idea of equality, and, as a result, the ideology of justice, was revealed. Thus, the fact that aggravating the criminal penalty, which is subject to mandatory application, as the commission of an intentional crime by an internal affairs officer contradicts the idea of equality (paragraph «o» of part 1 of article 63 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Article 88 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for the possibility of imposing a criminal penalty in the form of a fine on the parents, legal representatives of a minor who has committed a crime, which contradicts the principle of guilt and is unfair. \nThe identity of criminal-legal repression, which is applied both for a single crime and for repeated criminal behavior, should be considered unfair. The ineffectiveness of the criminal law prescriptions of the law on the imposition of punishment for a set of crimes was revealed on the basis of the analysis of judicial practice materials.","PeriodicalId":262841,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE RULE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE AND THE PROBLEMS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA\",\"authors\":\"O. Gorodnova\",\"doi\":\"10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the analysis of different aspects of the principle of justice in criminal law equalizing and distributing on the basis of the analysis of philosophical and legal thought. The substantiation of the supremacy of the principle of justice is presented. Other criminal law principles (criminal responsibility, humanism, equality of citizens before the law and the court) are analyzed as auxiliary, fully realizing the justice of the law and punishment. The connection between the principles of justice and legality, equality of citizens before the law and humanism, guilty responsibility is demonstrated. It is concluded that the equality of citizens before the law and humanism are different aspects of justice. Under the influence of the principle of justice, a circle of criminal acts is formed. A fair procedure for bringing guilty persons to criminal responsibility is based on strict observance of the principle of guilt, humane attitude to the guilty. \\nThe article analyzes certain provisions of criminal legislation for compliance with the principle of justice, considers the procedure for implementing legal principles in practice. In order to substantiate the conclusions of the study, a violation of the idea of equality, and, as a result, the ideology of justice, was revealed. Thus, the fact that aggravating the criminal penalty, which is subject to mandatory application, as the commission of an intentional crime by an internal affairs officer contradicts the idea of equality (paragraph «o» of part 1 of article 63 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Article 88 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for the possibility of imposing a criminal penalty in the form of a fine on the parents, legal representatives of a minor who has committed a crime, which contradicts the principle of guilt and is unfair. \\nThe identity of criminal-legal repression, which is applied both for a single crime and for repeated criminal behavior, should be considered unfair. The ineffectiveness of the criminal law prescriptions of the law on the imposition of punishment for a set of crimes was revealed on the basis of the analysis of judicial practice materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在分析哲学和法学思想的基础上,对刑法中公平分配原则的不同方面进行了分析。提出了正义至上原则的实证性。其他刑法原则(刑事责任原则、人本主义原则、公民在法律和法院面前平等原则)作为辅助加以分析,充分实现了法律和刑罚的公正。论证了公正性原则与合法性原则、法律面前公民平等原则与人道主义原则、罪责原则之间的联系。认为公民在法律面前的平等与人道主义是正义的不同方面。在正义原则的影响下,犯罪行为形成了一个循环。使罪犯承担刑事责任的公正程序是建立在严格遵守有罪原则和对罪犯采取人道态度的基础上的。本文分析了我国刑事立法中对公正原则的一些规定,并对法律原则在实践中的实施程序进行了思考。为了证实这项研究的结论,揭示了对平等观念的侵犯,结果是对正义意识形态的侵犯。因此,将必须强制执行的刑罚加重为内务官员故意犯罪的事实与平等的概念相矛盾(《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第63条第1部分第“o”款)。《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第88条规定,可以对犯罪的未成年人的法定代表父母处以罚款形式的刑事处罚,这违反了有罪原则,是不公平的。既适用于单一犯罪又适用于重复犯罪行为的刑法压制的同一性应被认为是不公平的。在对司法实践资料进行分析的基础上,揭示了《定罪处罚法》刑法规定的无效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE RULE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE AND THE PROBLEMS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA
The article is devoted to the analysis of different aspects of the principle of justice in criminal law equalizing and distributing on the basis of the analysis of philosophical and legal thought. The substantiation of the supremacy of the principle of justice is presented. Other criminal law principles (criminal responsibility, humanism, equality of citizens before the law and the court) are analyzed as auxiliary, fully realizing the justice of the law and punishment. The connection between the principles of justice and legality, equality of citizens before the law and humanism, guilty responsibility is demonstrated. It is concluded that the equality of citizens before the law and humanism are different aspects of justice. Under the influence of the principle of justice, a circle of criminal acts is formed. A fair procedure for bringing guilty persons to criminal responsibility is based on strict observance of the principle of guilt, humane attitude to the guilty. The article analyzes certain provisions of criminal legislation for compliance with the principle of justice, considers the procedure for implementing legal principles in practice. In order to substantiate the conclusions of the study, a violation of the idea of equality, and, as a result, the ideology of justice, was revealed. Thus, the fact that aggravating the criminal penalty, which is subject to mandatory application, as the commission of an intentional crime by an internal affairs officer contradicts the idea of equality (paragraph «o» of part 1 of article 63 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Article 88 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for the possibility of imposing a criminal penalty in the form of a fine on the parents, legal representatives of a minor who has committed a crime, which contradicts the principle of guilt and is unfair. The identity of criminal-legal repression, which is applied both for a single crime and for repeated criminal behavior, should be considered unfair. The ineffectiveness of the criminal law prescriptions of the law on the imposition of punishment for a set of crimes was revealed on the basis of the analysis of judicial practice materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信