新冠肺炎时代写作评价条件研究

Hyunil Park, Eun Jeong Lee, Yu-jin Baek
{"title":"新冠肺炎时代写作评价条件研究","authors":"Hyunil Park, Eun Jeong Lee, Yu-jin Baek","doi":"10.29221/JCE.2021.24.2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to identify the condition of non-face-to-face writing assessment and to analyze the problems faced by Korea language teachers to propose an effective non-face-to-face writing assessment method. To this end, 133 Korea language teachers were surveyed on the condition of writing assessment in 2020. The results are as follows. First, Korea language teachers who conducted only face-to-face assessment changed writing assessment task or assessment criteria in consideration of the decrease in the number of face-to-face classes. In particular, in terms of writing assessment tasks, changes such as ‘changing from collaborative writing to individual writing, lowering the level of difficulty in subjects, and reducing the amount of writing’ were notable. Second, Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment performed writing assessment mainly by using non-real-time online platforms or by submitting personal tasks rather than real-time non-face-to-face assessment. This suggests that results-oriented writing assessments were conducted rather than the performance process assessment, and that personalized feedback may not have been faithfully provided. Third, some Korea language teachers who conducted face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because of the education authorities’ guidelines to avoid reflecting non-face-to-face writing assessments. And some Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because they performed writing assessment that did not differ from face-to-face assessment using real-time media. Based on these results, we proposed ways to implement effective non-face-to-face write assessment.","PeriodicalId":198625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the Conditions of Writing Assessment in COVID-19\\n Era\",\"authors\":\"Hyunil Park, Eun Jeong Lee, Yu-jin Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.29221/JCE.2021.24.2.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to identify the condition of non-face-to-face writing assessment and to analyze the problems faced by Korea language teachers to propose an effective non-face-to-face writing assessment method. To this end, 133 Korea language teachers were surveyed on the condition of writing assessment in 2020. The results are as follows. First, Korea language teachers who conducted only face-to-face assessment changed writing assessment task or assessment criteria in consideration of the decrease in the number of face-to-face classes. In particular, in terms of writing assessment tasks, changes such as ‘changing from collaborative writing to individual writing, lowering the level of difficulty in subjects, and reducing the amount of writing’ were notable. Second, Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment performed writing assessment mainly by using non-real-time online platforms or by submitting personal tasks rather than real-time non-face-to-face assessment. This suggests that results-oriented writing assessments were conducted rather than the performance process assessment, and that personalized feedback may not have been faithfully provided. Third, some Korea language teachers who conducted face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because of the education authorities’ guidelines to avoid reflecting non-face-to-face writing assessments. And some Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because they performed writing assessment that did not differ from face-to-face assessment using real-time media. Based on these results, we proposed ways to implement effective non-face-to-face write assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29221/JCE.2021.24.2.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29221/JCE.2021.24.2.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是识别非面对面写作评估的状况,分析韩国语教师面临的问题,提出有效的非面对面写作评估方法。为此,对133名韩国语教师进行了2020年写作评价调查。结果如下:首先,只进行面对面考试的韩国语教师们考虑到面对面考试次数的减少,改变了写作考试任务或考试标准。特别是,在写作评估任务方面,“从合作写作转变为个人写作,降低科目难度,减少写作量”等变化明显。第二,进行非面对面评估的韩国语文教师主要通过非实时在线平台或提交个人作业进行写作评估,而不是实时非面对面评估。这表明,进行了以结果为导向的写作评估,而不是绩效过程评估,并且可能没有忠实地提供个性化反馈。第三,部分进行面对面评估的语文教师,因为教育当局的指导方针,避免反映非面对面的写作评估,所以没有改变写作评估任务或评估标准。而部分进行非面对面评价的语文教师,因为使用实时媒体进行与面对面评价没有区别的写作评价,没有改变写作评价任务和评价标准。基于这些结果,我们提出了实施有效的非面对面写作评估的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the Conditions of Writing Assessment in COVID-19 Era
The purpose of this study is to identify the condition of non-face-to-face writing assessment and to analyze the problems faced by Korea language teachers to propose an effective non-face-to-face writing assessment method. To this end, 133 Korea language teachers were surveyed on the condition of writing assessment in 2020. The results are as follows. First, Korea language teachers who conducted only face-to-face assessment changed writing assessment task or assessment criteria in consideration of the decrease in the number of face-to-face classes. In particular, in terms of writing assessment tasks, changes such as ‘changing from collaborative writing to individual writing, lowering the level of difficulty in subjects, and reducing the amount of writing’ were notable. Second, Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment performed writing assessment mainly by using non-real-time online platforms or by submitting personal tasks rather than real-time non-face-to-face assessment. This suggests that results-oriented writing assessments were conducted rather than the performance process assessment, and that personalized feedback may not have been faithfully provided. Third, some Korea language teachers who conducted face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because of the education authorities’ guidelines to avoid reflecting non-face-to-face writing assessments. And some Korea language teachers who conducted non-face-to-face assessment did not change their writing assessment task or assessment criteria because they performed writing assessment that did not differ from face-to-face assessment using real-time media. Based on these results, we proposed ways to implement effective non-face-to-face write assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信