对吞咽困难患者使用增稠液体的再检查

M. Gorham-Rowan
{"title":"对吞咽困难患者使用增稠液体的再检查","authors":"M. Gorham-Rowan","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000E112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of thickened liquids is a frequent recommendation by many speech-language pathologists to minimize or eliminate the possibility of oral aspiration of liquids. The basic premise supporting the use of thickened liquids is that increased viscosity results in a slower transit time and allows for greater control of the bolus, thus providing more time to trigger a pharyngeal swallow. In theory, then, the use of thickened liquids should reduce chances of aspiration. In practice, however, this assumption does not always hold true. For example, patients with dementia have been shown to continue to aspirate with thickened liquids of varying viscosity, from nectar to honey-thick liquids [1]. Furthermore, increased viscosity may not necessarily reduce adverse effects associated with aspiration, as evidenced by a higher rate of pneumonia among patients with dementia who were given honey thick liquids compared to those given nectar-thick liquids [2]. To date, there is a paucity of data to support the benefits of thickened liquids [3] but the emerging evidence suggests that the use of thickened liquids not “a one size fits all” approach and individual patient characteristics must be taken into account.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-examining the Use of Thickened Liquids among Patients with Dysphagia\",\"authors\":\"M. Gorham-Rowan\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2375-4427.1000E112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of thickened liquids is a frequent recommendation by many speech-language pathologists to minimize or eliminate the possibility of oral aspiration of liquids. The basic premise supporting the use of thickened liquids is that increased viscosity results in a slower transit time and allows for greater control of the bolus, thus providing more time to trigger a pharyngeal swallow. In theory, then, the use of thickened liquids should reduce chances of aspiration. In practice, however, this assumption does not always hold true. For example, patients with dementia have been shown to continue to aspirate with thickened liquids of varying viscosity, from nectar to honey-thick liquids [1]. Furthermore, increased viscosity may not necessarily reduce adverse effects associated with aspiration, as evidenced by a higher rate of pneumonia among patients with dementia who were given honey thick liquids compared to those given nectar-thick liquids [2]. To date, there is a paucity of data to support the benefits of thickened liquids [3] but the emerging evidence suggests that the use of thickened liquids not “a one size fits all” approach and individual patient characteristics must be taken into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000E112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000E112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

许多语言病理学家经常建议使用增稠液体来减少或消除口腔吸液体的可能性。支持使用增稠液体的基本前提是,增加的粘度导致更慢的传输时间,并允许更好地控制丸,从而提供更多的时间来触发咽部吞咽。因此,理论上,使用增稠液体应该会减少误吸的机会。然而,在实践中,这种假设并不总是正确的。例如,痴呆症患者会继续吸入不同粘度的增稠液体,从花蜜到蜂蜜稠的液体[1]。此外,黏度的增加不一定会减少误吸相关的不良反应,这一点已被证明:与服用花蜜粘稠液体的患者相比,服用蜂蜜粘稠液体的痴呆症患者的肺炎发病率更高[2]。迄今为止,支持增稠液体益处的数据缺乏[3],但新出现的证据表明,增稠液体的使用不是“一刀切”的方法,必须考虑到患者的个体特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-examining the Use of Thickened Liquids among Patients with Dysphagia
The use of thickened liquids is a frequent recommendation by many speech-language pathologists to minimize or eliminate the possibility of oral aspiration of liquids. The basic premise supporting the use of thickened liquids is that increased viscosity results in a slower transit time and allows for greater control of the bolus, thus providing more time to trigger a pharyngeal swallow. In theory, then, the use of thickened liquids should reduce chances of aspiration. In practice, however, this assumption does not always hold true. For example, patients with dementia have been shown to continue to aspirate with thickened liquids of varying viscosity, from nectar to honey-thick liquids [1]. Furthermore, increased viscosity may not necessarily reduce adverse effects associated with aspiration, as evidenced by a higher rate of pneumonia among patients with dementia who were given honey thick liquids compared to those given nectar-thick liquids [2]. To date, there is a paucity of data to support the benefits of thickened liquids [3] but the emerging evidence suggests that the use of thickened liquids not “a one size fits all” approach and individual patient characteristics must be taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信