Cipto Mangunkusumo总医院放射治疗门诊身高估算的外部验证试验

W. Lestari, F. Witjaksono, Nurul Ratna Mutu Manikam, W. I. Wardhani, Krisadelfa Sutanto
{"title":"Cipto Mangunkusumo总医院放射治疗门诊身高估算的外部验证试验","authors":"W. Lestari, F. Witjaksono, Nurul Ratna Mutu Manikam, W. I. Wardhani, Krisadelfa Sutanto","doi":"10.25220/wnj.v06.i2.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Stature is required to calculate body mass index and determine the energy needs of patients in nutritional medical therapy. Difficulty was found to obtain stature data in patients who are unable to stand. Therefore, there are some height estimation formula to predict the actual height using knee height. This study aimed to validate the Chumlea formula on outpatient clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia. \nMethods : This cross-sectional study used 90 respondents selected by consecutive sampling. Actual height, knee height, age and gender data were collected. Estimated height using the three of Chumlea formula. Pearson correlation was used to see the correlation between actual height and estimated height. Paired t-test were used to determine the difference significance. \nResults : The average age of the subjects was  45±10 years old with actual height 157±10 cm, and knee height 48.8±3.5 cm. A strong positive correlation was found between actual height with all estimated height on male (p=0.000; r > 0.8) and female subjects (p=0.000; r > 0.6). However, comparison between actual height and estimated height showed no significant differences only in Chumlea L1 formula (p=0.087) and Chumlea L3 formula (p=0.824) on the male subjects. \nConclusions : Chumlea L1 and Chumlea L3 formula was a valid fomulation for calculating the estimated body height in adult male patients. There was no valid Chumlea’s formulation to estimate body height in female patients.","PeriodicalId":430062,"journal":{"name":"World Nutrition Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation test of body height estimation on outpatient radiotherapy clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital\",\"authors\":\"W. Lestari, F. Witjaksono, Nurul Ratna Mutu Manikam, W. I. Wardhani, Krisadelfa Sutanto\",\"doi\":\"10.25220/wnj.v06.i2.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Stature is required to calculate body mass index and determine the energy needs of patients in nutritional medical therapy. Difficulty was found to obtain stature data in patients who are unable to stand. Therefore, there are some height estimation formula to predict the actual height using knee height. This study aimed to validate the Chumlea formula on outpatient clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia. \\nMethods : This cross-sectional study used 90 respondents selected by consecutive sampling. Actual height, knee height, age and gender data were collected. Estimated height using the three of Chumlea formula. Pearson correlation was used to see the correlation between actual height and estimated height. Paired t-test were used to determine the difference significance. \\nResults : The average age of the subjects was  45±10 years old with actual height 157±10 cm, and knee height 48.8±3.5 cm. A strong positive correlation was found between actual height with all estimated height on male (p=0.000; r > 0.8) and female subjects (p=0.000; r > 0.6). However, comparison between actual height and estimated height showed no significant differences only in Chumlea L1 formula (p=0.087) and Chumlea L3 formula (p=0.824) on the male subjects. \\nConclusions : Chumlea L1 and Chumlea L3 formula was a valid fomulation for calculating the estimated body height in adult male patients. There was no valid Chumlea’s formulation to estimate body height in female patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Nutrition Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Nutrition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25220/wnj.v06.i2.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25220/wnj.v06.i2.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在营养医学治疗中,身高是计算身体质量指数和确定患者能量需求的必要条件。难以获得无法站立的患者的身高数据。因此,有一些身高估计公式,以膝盖高度预测实际高度。本研究的目的是在印尼Cipto Mangunkusumo总医院的门诊验证香草方。方法:采用连续抽样的方法,选取90名被调查者进行横断面研究。收集实际身高、膝高、年龄和性别数据。估计高度使用3的Chumlea公式。使用Pearson相关性来观察实际身高和估计身高之间的相关性。采用配对t检验确定差异显著性。结果:受试者平均年龄45±10岁,实际身高157±10 cm,膝高48.8±3.5 cm。男性的实际身高与所有的估计身高之间存在很强的正相关(p=0.000;R > 0.8)和女性受试者(p=0.000;R > 0.6)。而男性受试者的实际身高与估计身高比较,只有Chumlea L1公式(p=0.087)和Chumlea L3公式(p=0.824)差异无统计学意义。结论:Chumlea L1和Chumlea L3公式是计算成年男性患者估计身高的有效公式。没有有效的Chumlea公式来估计女性患者的身高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External validation test of body height estimation on outpatient radiotherapy clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
Background : Stature is required to calculate body mass index and determine the energy needs of patients in nutritional medical therapy. Difficulty was found to obtain stature data in patients who are unable to stand. Therefore, there are some height estimation formula to predict the actual height using knee height. This study aimed to validate the Chumlea formula on outpatient clinic of Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Indonesia. Methods : This cross-sectional study used 90 respondents selected by consecutive sampling. Actual height, knee height, age and gender data were collected. Estimated height using the three of Chumlea formula. Pearson correlation was used to see the correlation between actual height and estimated height. Paired t-test were used to determine the difference significance. Results : The average age of the subjects was  45±10 years old with actual height 157±10 cm, and knee height 48.8±3.5 cm. A strong positive correlation was found between actual height with all estimated height on male (p=0.000; r > 0.8) and female subjects (p=0.000; r > 0.6). However, comparison between actual height and estimated height showed no significant differences only in Chumlea L1 formula (p=0.087) and Chumlea L3 formula (p=0.824) on the male subjects. Conclusions : Chumlea L1 and Chumlea L3 formula was a valid fomulation for calculating the estimated body height in adult male patients. There was no valid Chumlea’s formulation to estimate body height in female patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信