Veljko Vlašković
{"title":"PRAVO RODITELjA DA OBRAZUJU DETE U KONTEKSTU USLUGA OBAVEZNOG OSNOVNOG OBRAZOVANjA","authors":"Veljko Vlašković","doi":"10.46793/xixmajsko.825v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass, compulsory and free primary education is one of the most important achievements of civilization, which is recognized in a whole series of international treaties on human rights. In this sense, the minimum core obligations of states is to provide every child with access to primary education within the framework of the right to education, as an expression of formal education and a key segment of the child's right to education in general. On the other hand, the parents or guardians of the child have the duty to educate the child. Parents are granted the autonomy to do so in accordance with their religious and moral convictions if they do not violate the rights of the child and the aims of education proclaimed in international human rights treaties. In this context, parents have the obligation to make primary education available to their children, while retaining the right to choose a public or appropriate private primary school in accordance with the law. In an effort to enable the application of the best interests of the child to each specific child, the legislation of Serbia in the domain of primary education also recognizes forms of schooling at home or at a distance, but only if the child has previously been enrolled in primary school. Parents cannot refuse to enroll a child in primary school, although the sanctions provided for such behavior are ineffective. In this way, parents could not decide to take over exclusively the provision of primary education services to the child, referring to their religious or philosophical convictions. In such cases, the Family Law of Serbia can offer a more adequate approach to solving the problem in the form of measures of corrective supervision over the exercise of parental rights and, ultimately, court decisions on protecting the child's right to education or depriving the parents of their duty to educate the child.","PeriodicalId":325482,"journal":{"name":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravna regulativa usluga u nacionalnim zakonodavstvima i pravu Evropske Unije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.825v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模、义务和免费的初等教育是文明最重要的成就之一,这在一系列国际人权条约中得到了承认。从这个意义上说,国家的最低核心义务是在受教育权的框架内为每个儿童提供接受初等教育的机会,这是正规教育的一种表现,也是儿童一般受教育权的一个关键部分。另一方面,孩子的父母或监护人有义务教育孩子。如果父母不违反儿童的权利和国际人权条约所宣布的教育目标,父母有权根据其宗教和道德信念这样做。在这方面,父母有义务为子女提供初等教育,同时保留依法选择公立或适当的私立小学的权利。为了使儿童的最大利益适用于每一个具体的儿童,塞尔维亚在初等教育领域的立法也承认家庭或远程教育的形式,但前提是儿童以前曾就读过小学。父母不能拒绝让孩子上小学,尽管对这种行为的制裁是无效的。这样,父母就不能根据他们的宗教或哲学信仰,决定完全接管向儿童提供初等教育服务。在这种情况下,塞尔维亚的《家庭法》可以提供一种更适当的办法来解决这一问题,其形式是对父母权利的行使采取纠正性监督措施,并最终由法院就保护儿童受教育的权利或剥夺父母教育儿童的义务作出裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRAVO RODITELjA DA OBRAZUJU DETE U KONTEKSTU USLUGA OBAVEZNOG OSNOVNOG OBRAZOVANjA
Mass, compulsory and free primary education is one of the most important achievements of civilization, which is recognized in a whole series of international treaties on human rights. In this sense, the minimum core obligations of states is to provide every child with access to primary education within the framework of the right to education, as an expression of formal education and a key segment of the child's right to education in general. On the other hand, the parents or guardians of the child have the duty to educate the child. Parents are granted the autonomy to do so in accordance with their religious and moral convictions if they do not violate the rights of the child and the aims of education proclaimed in international human rights treaties. In this context, parents have the obligation to make primary education available to their children, while retaining the right to choose a public or appropriate private primary school in accordance with the law. In an effort to enable the application of the best interests of the child to each specific child, the legislation of Serbia in the domain of primary education also recognizes forms of schooling at home or at a distance, but only if the child has previously been enrolled in primary school. Parents cannot refuse to enroll a child in primary school, although the sanctions provided for such behavior are ineffective. In this way, parents could not decide to take over exclusively the provision of primary education services to the child, referring to their religious or philosophical convictions. In such cases, the Family Law of Serbia can offer a more adequate approach to solving the problem in the form of measures of corrective supervision over the exercise of parental rights and, ultimately, court decisions on protecting the child's right to education or depriving the parents of their duty to educate the child.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信