{"title":"南榜大学社会科学系课程微格教学项目评估","authors":"Zulkarnain, Dian Utami","doi":"10.21009/eips.005.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format. \nKeywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.","PeriodicalId":379773,"journal":{"name":"Edukasi IPS","volume":"422 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Course Microteaching Program in the Department of Social Science, University of Lampung\",\"authors\":\"Zulkarnain, Dian Utami\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/eips.005.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format. \\nKeywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edukasi IPS\",\"volume\":\"422 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edukasi IPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/eips.005.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukasi IPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/eips.005.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Evaluation of the Course Microteaching Program in the Department of Social Science, University of Lampung
The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format.
Keywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.