南榜大学社会科学系课程微格教学项目评估

Zulkarnain, Dian Utami
{"title":"南榜大学社会科学系课程微格教学项目评估","authors":"Zulkarnain, Dian Utami","doi":"10.21009/eips.005.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format. \nKeywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.","PeriodicalId":379773,"journal":{"name":"Edukasi IPS","volume":"422 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Course Microteaching Program in the Department of Social Science, University of Lampung\",\"authors\":\"Zulkarnain, Dian Utami\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/eips.005.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format. \\nKeywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edukasi IPS\",\"volume\":\"422 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edukasi IPS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/eips.005.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukasi IPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/eips.005.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨南榜大学社会教育学系学生对微教学计划的评价。使用的样本是47名学生和实验室负责人作为告密者。使用的研究方法是调查。数据收集技术使用观察,问卷调查,文件。使用的数据分析是描述性分析。结果表明:1)微教学实验室有sop,但仍缺乏社会化,许多用户还不了解;2)没有微实践教学手册,可以作为学生和讲师的参考或指导;3)基于规范的微教学实验室标准,仍有许多不足之处需要完善和解决。4)缺乏标准的微教学实践评估格式。关键词:评价,微格教学,社会学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of the Course Microteaching Program in the Department of Social Science, University of Lampung
The purpose of this study was to examine the evaluation of the Micro Teaching program in students of the Social Studies Education Department, University of Lampung. The samples used were 47 students and the head of the laboratory as informants. The research method used is a survey. Data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, documentation. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis. The results showed: 1) The micro teaching laboratory has SOPs but still lacks socialization, so that many users do not know yet, 2) There is no micro practical teaching manual that can be used as a reference or guideline for students and lecturers, 3) Based on specifications Micro teaching laboratory standards, there are still many shortcomings that must be completed and addressed. 4) The absence of a standard micro teaching practice assessment format. Keywords: Evaluation, Microteaching Subject, Social Studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信