M. Khan, M. Mesbah, L. Ferreira, David J. Williams
{"title":"道路管理机构的洪水前道路养护策略","authors":"M. Khan, M. Mesbah, L. Ferreira, David J. Williams","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has derived a preflood road maintenance strategy. It provides an innovative approach by upgrading pavement strength now (Year 1 of the analysis) with a thin overlay, and then evaluating pavement lifecycle performance if a flood comes in different years. An after-flood treatment strategy would also be a part of this strategy package. The study has considered normal deterioration after a treatment given in Year 1 and uses the new roughness and rutting based road deterioration (RD) models to predict after-flood deterioration before providing postflood treatments. The study has used highway development and management (HDM-4) model for obtaining after-flood treatments. The results show pavement performance, necessary treatments at Year 1 and any year, required budget, and economic results. For a case study in Queensland, Australia, the treatment cost in Year 1 was about $21.13 billion, and the total preflood strategy cost is $37 billion to $38 billion. A thin overlay is adequate for after-flood rehabilitation. This preflood strategy is compared with a recently derived postflood strategy, and it appears that a preflood strategy can maintain the network better and demonstrate positive economic benefits.","PeriodicalId":305908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preflood Road Maintenance Strategy for a Road Authority\",\"authors\":\"M. Khan, M. Mesbah, L. Ferreira, David J. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper has derived a preflood road maintenance strategy. It provides an innovative approach by upgrading pavement strength now (Year 1 of the analysis) with a thin overlay, and then evaluating pavement lifecycle performance if a flood comes in different years. An after-flood treatment strategy would also be a part of this strategy package. The study has considered normal deterioration after a treatment given in Year 1 and uses the new roughness and rutting based road deterioration (RD) models to predict after-flood deterioration before providing postflood treatments. The study has used highway development and management (HDM-4) model for obtaining after-flood treatments. The results show pavement performance, necessary treatments at Year 1 and any year, required budget, and economic results. For a case study in Queensland, Australia, the treatment cost in Year 1 was about $21.13 billion, and the total preflood strategy cost is $37 billion to $38 billion. A thin overlay is adequate for after-flood rehabilitation. This preflood strategy is compared with a recently derived postflood strategy, and it appears that a preflood strategy can maintain the network better and demonstrate positive economic benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Engineering-asce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preflood Road Maintenance Strategy for a Road Authority
This paper has derived a preflood road maintenance strategy. It provides an innovative approach by upgrading pavement strength now (Year 1 of the analysis) with a thin overlay, and then evaluating pavement lifecycle performance if a flood comes in different years. An after-flood treatment strategy would also be a part of this strategy package. The study has considered normal deterioration after a treatment given in Year 1 and uses the new roughness and rutting based road deterioration (RD) models to predict after-flood deterioration before providing postflood treatments. The study has used highway development and management (HDM-4) model for obtaining after-flood treatments. The results show pavement performance, necessary treatments at Year 1 and any year, required budget, and economic results. For a case study in Queensland, Australia, the treatment cost in Year 1 was about $21.13 billion, and the total preflood strategy cost is $37 billion to $38 billion. A thin overlay is adequate for after-flood rehabilitation. This preflood strategy is compared with a recently derived postflood strategy, and it appears that a preflood strategy can maintain the network better and demonstrate positive economic benefits.