前瞻性和响应性市场导向的前提

Paul R. Lamore, D. Berkowitz, P. Farrington
{"title":"前瞻性和响应性市场导向的前提","authors":"Paul R. Lamore, D. Berkowitz, P. Farrington","doi":"10.1504/IJSSM.2013.056383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the introduction of the proactive and responsive market orientation constructs into the market orientation literature, there has been limited empirical research regarding the antecedents of each type of market orientation and the relationship each may have on the market performance of new products. This research investigates the influence of organisational culture, competitive intensity and organisational age and size on the development of a firm’s market orientation, and how these two distinct forms of market orientation may influence organisational success. The results of this study indicate empirical evidence that cultures classified as adhocracy and market exhibit positive relationships with both responsive and proactive market orientation, whereas cultures classified as clan and hierarchy do not. Competitive intensity does not exhibit a significant relationship with either market orientation classification. Proactive market orientation exhibits a significant positive relationship with market performance, whereas responsive market orientation does not. The results may guide managers in developing the appropriate organisational environment to support successful innovation efforts.","PeriodicalId":319298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents of proactive and responsive market orientation\",\"authors\":\"Paul R. Lamore, D. Berkowitz, P. Farrington\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSSM.2013.056383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the introduction of the proactive and responsive market orientation constructs into the market orientation literature, there has been limited empirical research regarding the antecedents of each type of market orientation and the relationship each may have on the market performance of new products. This research investigates the influence of organisational culture, competitive intensity and organisational age and size on the development of a firm’s market orientation, and how these two distinct forms of market orientation may influence organisational success. The results of this study indicate empirical evidence that cultures classified as adhocracy and market exhibit positive relationships with both responsive and proactive market orientation, whereas cultures classified as clan and hierarchy do not. Competitive intensity does not exhibit a significant relationship with either market orientation classification. Proactive market orientation exhibits a significant positive relationship with market performance, whereas responsive market orientation does not. The results may guide managers in developing the appropriate organisational environment to support successful innovation efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2013.056383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSM.2013.056383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于市场导向文献中引入了主动型和响应型市场导向结构,因此对于每种类型的市场导向的前因以及每种市场导向对新产品市场绩效可能产生的关系的实证研究有限。本研究考察了组织文化、竞争强度、组织年龄和规模对企业市场导向发展的影响,以及这两种不同形式的市场导向如何影响组织的成功。本研究的结果表明,实证证据表明,被归类为民主和市场的文化与响应性和主动性市场导向都表现出积极的关系,而被归类为氏族和等级的文化则没有。竞争强度与两种市场取向分类均无显著关系。主动市场导向与市场绩效呈显著正相关,而响应型市场导向与市场绩效无显著正相关。研究结果可以指导管理者发展适当的组织环境,以支持成功的创新努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antecedents of proactive and responsive market orientation
Since the introduction of the proactive and responsive market orientation constructs into the market orientation literature, there has been limited empirical research regarding the antecedents of each type of market orientation and the relationship each may have on the market performance of new products. This research investigates the influence of organisational culture, competitive intensity and organisational age and size on the development of a firm’s market orientation, and how these two distinct forms of market orientation may influence organisational success. The results of this study indicate empirical evidence that cultures classified as adhocracy and market exhibit positive relationships with both responsive and proactive market orientation, whereas cultures classified as clan and hierarchy do not. Competitive intensity does not exhibit a significant relationship with either market orientation classification. Proactive market orientation exhibits a significant positive relationship with market performance, whereas responsive market orientation does not. The results may guide managers in developing the appropriate organisational environment to support successful innovation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信