医本科生移情教学:从实践的翻译

B. Lim, H. Moriarty, Mark Huthwaite, P. Gallagher, Roshan Perera
{"title":"医本科生移情教学:从实践的翻译","authors":"B. Lim, H. Moriarty, Mark Huthwaite, P. Gallagher, Roshan Perera","doi":"10.11157/FOHPE.V17I1.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clinical empathy is the cornerstone of a good patient–clinician relationship. Th is study aims to examine the impact of an empathy teaching innovation (ETI) on empathic communication in medical students, which was introduced in a new medical curriculum and incorporates clinical skills and patient contacts from students’ fi rst-year study. Method: A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) collected data on medical students’ self-reported empathy using the Je ff erson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE), simulated patients’ ratings of each student using the Je ff erson Scale of Patient Perception of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) and students’ performance in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Half of the medical students (n = 39) received the ETI and the other half (n = 40) acted as the control group. Th e ETI is a 1-hour actor-led empathy workshop focusing on “being-in-role” and how to “walk a mile in the patient’s shoes”, previously shown to improve medical students’ empathy scores. Results: Th e medical students who received the ETI were rated as more empathetic by the simulated patients, with statistically signi fi cant correlations between patients’ perception of empathy and the consultation performance for the intervention group, but not for the control group. However, the ETI did not signi fi cantly enhance student self-reported empathy. Conclusions: Th is study presents the ETI as a short intervention tool for improving medical students’ portrayal of clinical empathy, as perceived by simulated patients. Findings raise interesting questions for medical educationalists regarding the use of simulated (or actual) patients’ reports on empathy.","PeriodicalId":306686,"journal":{"name":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching empathy to undergraduate medical students: Translation to practice\",\"authors\":\"B. Lim, H. Moriarty, Mark Huthwaite, P. Gallagher, Roshan Perera\",\"doi\":\"10.11157/FOHPE.V17I1.122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Clinical empathy is the cornerstone of a good patient–clinician relationship. Th is study aims to examine the impact of an empathy teaching innovation (ETI) on empathic communication in medical students, which was introduced in a new medical curriculum and incorporates clinical skills and patient contacts from students’ fi rst-year study. Method: A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) collected data on medical students’ self-reported empathy using the Je ff erson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE), simulated patients’ ratings of each student using the Je ff erson Scale of Patient Perception of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) and students’ performance in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Half of the medical students (n = 39) received the ETI and the other half (n = 40) acted as the control group. Th e ETI is a 1-hour actor-led empathy workshop focusing on “being-in-role” and how to “walk a mile in the patient’s shoes”, previously shown to improve medical students’ empathy scores. Results: Th e medical students who received the ETI were rated as more empathetic by the simulated patients, with statistically signi fi cant correlations between patients’ perception of empathy and the consultation performance for the intervention group, but not for the control group. However, the ETI did not signi fi cantly enhance student self-reported empathy. Conclusions: Th is study presents the ETI as a short intervention tool for improving medical students’ portrayal of clinical empathy, as perceived by simulated patients. Findings raise interesting questions for medical educationalists regarding the use of simulated (or actual) patients’ reports on empathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V17I1.122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on health professional education : a multi-disciplinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/FOHPE.V17I1.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

临床共情是良好医患关系的基石。摘要本研究旨在探讨共情教学创新(ETI)对医学生共情沟通的影响,该创新是在新医学课程中引入的,并结合了医学生第一年学习的临床技能和患者接触。方法:采用整群随机对照试验(RCT)收集医学生用医生共情人格量表(JSPE)自述共情的数据,用医生共情人格量表(JSPPPE)模拟患者对每个学生的评分和学生在客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)中的表现。一半的医学生(n = 39)接受了ETI,另一半(n = 40)作为对照组。ETI是一个由演员主导的1小时共情研讨会,重点是“扮演角色”和如何“站在病人的立场上走一英里”,这在之前被证明可以提高医学生的共情得分。结果:接受ETI的医学生被模拟患者评价为更有同理心,干预组患者的同理心感知与会诊绩效之间存在统计学显著相关,而对照组患者的同理心感知与会诊绩效之间无统计学显著相关。然而,ETI并没有显著提高学生自我报告的同理心。结论:本研究提出了ETI作为一种短期干预工具,可以改善医学生对临床共情的描述,正如模拟患者所感知的那样。研究结果为医学教育家提出了关于模拟(或实际)患者关于移情的报告的使用的有趣问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching empathy to undergraduate medical students: Translation to practice
Introduction: Clinical empathy is the cornerstone of a good patient–clinician relationship. Th is study aims to examine the impact of an empathy teaching innovation (ETI) on empathic communication in medical students, which was introduced in a new medical curriculum and incorporates clinical skills and patient contacts from students’ fi rst-year study. Method: A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) collected data on medical students’ self-reported empathy using the Je ff erson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE), simulated patients’ ratings of each student using the Je ff erson Scale of Patient Perception of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) and students’ performance in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Half of the medical students (n = 39) received the ETI and the other half (n = 40) acted as the control group. Th e ETI is a 1-hour actor-led empathy workshop focusing on “being-in-role” and how to “walk a mile in the patient’s shoes”, previously shown to improve medical students’ empathy scores. Results: Th e medical students who received the ETI were rated as more empathetic by the simulated patients, with statistically signi fi cant correlations between patients’ perception of empathy and the consultation performance for the intervention group, but not for the control group. However, the ETI did not signi fi cantly enhance student self-reported empathy. Conclusions: Th is study presents the ETI as a short intervention tool for improving medical students’ portrayal of clinical empathy, as perceived by simulated patients. Findings raise interesting questions for medical educationalists regarding the use of simulated (or actual) patients’ reports on empathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信