建构伊斯兰治理的另类概念:Maqāṣidic方法

Maszlee Malik, Presint Putrajaya Malaysia
{"title":"建构伊斯兰治理的另类概念:Maqāṣidic方法","authors":"Maszlee Malik, Presint Putrajaya Malaysia","doi":"10.21315/kajh2019.26.s1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The common perception of Islamic governance is a dark image of a nondemocratic and autocratic system, or a dictatorship with iron claws, or the governance of the cleric elite with the infringement of people’s freedom under the banner of religion. This is mainly due to the fiqhī “legal positivistic” framework that is often used to explain issues concerning governance by mostly traditionalist and Islamicist scholars. Humanistic governance based on the preservation of the dignity of human beings, which has been the focal point in Islamic tenets, the inviolability of life, and responsible freedom should be explored and promoted as another alternative voice of the dominating conventional fiqhī legal positivistic hegemony. Thus, a new ijtihād (reasoning) in dealing with the subject is absolutely mandatory. This paper will look into a new approach to governance from the “consequentialistic” approach inspired by the general theory of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. This research will explore some conceptual grounds for the exploration by looking into the epistemological dimension of governance from Islamic sources and principles through “inductive qualitative method” to critically analyse the texts, as part of the deconstruction of discourse.","PeriodicalId":292008,"journal":{"name":"KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing an Alternative Concept of Islamic Governance: A Maqāṣidic\\n Approach\",\"authors\":\"Maszlee Malik, Presint Putrajaya Malaysia\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/kajh2019.26.s1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The common perception of Islamic governance is a dark image of a nondemocratic and autocratic system, or a dictatorship with iron claws, or the governance of the cleric elite with the infringement of people’s freedom under the banner of religion. This is mainly due to the fiqhī “legal positivistic” framework that is often used to explain issues concerning governance by mostly traditionalist and Islamicist scholars. Humanistic governance based on the preservation of the dignity of human beings, which has been the focal point in Islamic tenets, the inviolability of life, and responsible freedom should be explored and promoted as another alternative voice of the dominating conventional fiqhī legal positivistic hegemony. Thus, a new ijtihād (reasoning) in dealing with the subject is absolutely mandatory. This paper will look into a new approach to governance from the “consequentialistic” approach inspired by the general theory of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. This research will explore some conceptual grounds for the exploration by looking into the epistemological dimension of governance from Islamic sources and principles through “inductive qualitative method” to critically analyse the texts, as part of the deconstruction of discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2019.26.s1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEMANUSIAAN The Asian Journal of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2019.26.s1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人们对伊斯兰教治理的普遍印象是一种非民主的专制制度,或者是铁腕的独裁统治,或者是打着宗教旗号侵犯人民自由的神职精英统治的黑暗形象。这主要是由于fiqh ' s“法律实证主义”框架,该框架通常被大多数传统主义者和伊斯兰学者用来解释有关治理的问题。应该探索和促进以维护人类尊严为基础的人本主义治理,这是伊斯兰教义的重点,生命的不可侵犯性和负责任的自由,作为占主导地位的传统法律实证主义霸权的另一种声音。因此,在处理这个问题时,一个新的ijtihād(推理)是绝对必要的。本文将从“结果主义”的治理方法出发,在Maqāṣid al- sharu - tah一般理论的启发下探讨一种新的治理方法。作为话语解构的一部分,本研究将通过“归纳定性方法”来批判性地分析文本,从伊斯兰的来源和原则出发,探讨治理的认识论维度,为探索探索提供一些概念基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing an Alternative Concept of Islamic Governance: A Maqāṣidic Approach
The common perception of Islamic governance is a dark image of a nondemocratic and autocratic system, or a dictatorship with iron claws, or the governance of the cleric elite with the infringement of people’s freedom under the banner of religion. This is mainly due to the fiqhī “legal positivistic” framework that is often used to explain issues concerning governance by mostly traditionalist and Islamicist scholars. Humanistic governance based on the preservation of the dignity of human beings, which has been the focal point in Islamic tenets, the inviolability of life, and responsible freedom should be explored and promoted as another alternative voice of the dominating conventional fiqhī legal positivistic hegemony. Thus, a new ijtihād (reasoning) in dealing with the subject is absolutely mandatory. This paper will look into a new approach to governance from the “consequentialistic” approach inspired by the general theory of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. This research will explore some conceptual grounds for the exploration by looking into the epistemological dimension of governance from Islamic sources and principles through “inductive qualitative method” to critically analyse the texts, as part of the deconstruction of discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信