PSA以外前列腺癌的诊断和危险分层分子标记

F. Pinto, M. Ragonese
{"title":"PSA以外前列腺癌的诊断和危险分层分子标记","authors":"F. Pinto, M. Ragonese","doi":"10.47363/jdcrs/2021(2)115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer still represents the most common urinary malignancies and the second most common cancer in adult men after skin cancer. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) represents a milestone in the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer since its introduction even considering its limitations in term of sensitivity and specificity. The widespread use of PSA often led to unnecessary biopsies and to the diagnosis of indolent cancers that do not require treatment, therefore in the era of tailored personalized medicine there is a strong need for new markers that overcome PSA and that can help to identify the patients that have clinically significant disease that must be treated. To date different urinary and serum biomarkers have been proposed in the diagnostic setting with promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity, however, none of them have been routinely introduced in clinical practice. In this review we reported the latest evidence for prostate cancer diagnosis in terms of urinary and blood biomarkers. Considering all the available markers, it is highly unlikely that one single assay could fit all the requirements and it seems appropriate to use the combination of different urinary and serum markers together with clinical parameters in order to guarantee a good diagnostic performance and to identify only clinically significant disease","PeriodicalId":109633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diagnosis & Case Reports","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and Risk Stratification Molecular Markers of Prostate Cancer Beyond PSA\",\"authors\":\"F. Pinto, M. Ragonese\",\"doi\":\"10.47363/jdcrs/2021(2)115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prostate cancer still represents the most common urinary malignancies and the second most common cancer in adult men after skin cancer. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) represents a milestone in the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer since its introduction even considering its limitations in term of sensitivity and specificity. The widespread use of PSA often led to unnecessary biopsies and to the diagnosis of indolent cancers that do not require treatment, therefore in the era of tailored personalized medicine there is a strong need for new markers that overcome PSA and that can help to identify the patients that have clinically significant disease that must be treated. To date different urinary and serum biomarkers have been proposed in the diagnostic setting with promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity, however, none of them have been routinely introduced in clinical practice. In this review we reported the latest evidence for prostate cancer diagnosis in terms of urinary and blood biomarkers. Considering all the available markers, it is highly unlikely that one single assay could fit all the requirements and it seems appropriate to use the combination of different urinary and serum markers together with clinical parameters in order to guarantee a good diagnostic performance and to identify only clinically significant disease\",\"PeriodicalId\":109633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diagnosis & Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diagnosis & Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdcrs/2021(2)115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diagnosis & Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdcrs/2021(2)115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌仍然是最常见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤,也是成年男性中仅次于皮肤癌的第二常见癌症。尽管前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)在敏感性和特异性方面存在局限性,但它自问世以来,在前列腺癌的诊断和筛查方面具有里程碑式的意义。PSA的广泛使用经常导致不必要的活组织检查和不需要治疗的惰性癌症的诊断,因此在量身定制的个性化医疗时代,迫切需要新的标志物来克服PSA,帮助识别患有必须治疗的临床重大疾病的患者。迄今为止,不同的尿液和血清生物标志物在诊断环境中被提出,在敏感性和特异性方面取得了有希望的结果,然而,它们都没有被常规地引入临床实践。在这篇综述中,我们报道了从尿液和血液生物标志物方面诊断前列腺癌的最新证据。考虑到所有可用的标记物,单次检测不太可能满足所有要求,为了保证良好的诊断性能并仅识别临床显著的疾病,将不同的尿液和血清标记物与临床参数结合使用似乎是合适的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic and Risk Stratification Molecular Markers of Prostate Cancer Beyond PSA
Prostate cancer still represents the most common urinary malignancies and the second most common cancer in adult men after skin cancer. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) represents a milestone in the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer since its introduction even considering its limitations in term of sensitivity and specificity. The widespread use of PSA often led to unnecessary biopsies and to the diagnosis of indolent cancers that do not require treatment, therefore in the era of tailored personalized medicine there is a strong need for new markers that overcome PSA and that can help to identify the patients that have clinically significant disease that must be treated. To date different urinary and serum biomarkers have been proposed in the diagnostic setting with promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity, however, none of them have been routinely introduced in clinical practice. In this review we reported the latest evidence for prostate cancer diagnosis in terms of urinary and blood biomarkers. Considering all the available markers, it is highly unlikely that one single assay could fit all the requirements and it seems appropriate to use the combination of different urinary and serum markers together with clinical parameters in order to guarantee a good diagnostic performance and to identify only clinically significant disease
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信