{"title":"评估证词中的一致性:元分析综述/[评估证词中的一致性效应:元分析综述]","authors":"Adriana Selaya, Jéssica Sanmarco, Ramón Arce","doi":"10.2478/9788395609596-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the aim of knowing the effect of conformity in the introduction of erroneous information in testimony, a meta-analytical review was carried out. A search of studies about the effects of conformity in the witness’ memory was made, with a total of 12 primary studies found, from which 17 effect sizes were computed. The results exhibited a positive ( d = 1.44), significant, generalizable mean effect size and of a magnitude greater than 69.22% of all positive possible effects. Nevertheless, the mean effect is mediated by moderators. Moreover, the results support that, as a consequence of conformity effect, the probability of introducing information non-observed (truthful or erroneous) by the witness increases until 85%, and that the conformity rate reaches to 58% of the witnesses. The implications of the results for the evaluation of the testimony in judicial judgement making are discussed.","PeriodicalId":422136,"journal":{"name":"Colección Psicología y Ley","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESTIMACIÓN DE LA CONFORMIDAD EN EL TESTIMONIO: UNA REVISIÓN META-ANALÍTICA / [ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF CONFORMITY IN TESTIMONY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW]\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Selaya, Jéssica Sanmarco, Ramón Arce\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/9788395609596-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the aim of knowing the effect of conformity in the introduction of erroneous information in testimony, a meta-analytical review was carried out. A search of studies about the effects of conformity in the witness’ memory was made, with a total of 12 primary studies found, from which 17 effect sizes were computed. The results exhibited a positive ( d = 1.44), significant, generalizable mean effect size and of a magnitude greater than 69.22% of all positive possible effects. Nevertheless, the mean effect is mediated by moderators. Moreover, the results support that, as a consequence of conformity effect, the probability of introducing information non-observed (truthful or erroneous) by the witness increases until 85%, and that the conformity rate reaches to 58% of the witnesses. The implications of the results for the evaluation of the testimony in judicial judgement making are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colección Psicología y Ley\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colección Psicología y Ley\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/9788395609596-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colección Psicología y Ley","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/9788395609596-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ESTIMACIÓN DE LA CONFORMIDAD EN EL TESTIMONIO: UNA REVISIÓN META-ANALÍTICA / [ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF CONFORMITY IN TESTIMONY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW]
With the aim of knowing the effect of conformity in the introduction of erroneous information in testimony, a meta-analytical review was carried out. A search of studies about the effects of conformity in the witness’ memory was made, with a total of 12 primary studies found, from which 17 effect sizes were computed. The results exhibited a positive ( d = 1.44), significant, generalizable mean effect size and of a magnitude greater than 69.22% of all positive possible effects. Nevertheless, the mean effect is mediated by moderators. Moreover, the results support that, as a consequence of conformity effect, the probability of introducing information non-observed (truthful or erroneous) by the witness increases until 85%, and that the conformity rate reaches to 58% of the witnesses. The implications of the results for the evaluation of the testimony in judicial judgement making are discussed.