曲线障碍表示的限定Douglas-Peucker多边形近似

Jin-Woo Jung, Byung-Chul So, Jin-Gu Kang, Woo-Jin Jang
{"title":"曲线障碍表示的限定Douglas-Peucker多边形近似","authors":"Jin-Woo Jung, Byung-Chul So, Jin-Gu Kang, Woo-Jin Jang","doi":"10.1109/RITAPP.2019.8932794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ECD (Exact Cell Decomposition) based path planning is not applicable in curvilinear obstacles environment. Therefore, after the curvilinear obstacles are approximated to the polygons by using DP (Douglas-Peucker) algorithm, which is a polygon approximation algorithm, the ECD method is applied. However, there is a case of not including all the existing obstacles' area and ignoring the outer area, when it comes to the curvilinear obstacles, approximated to the polygons by using the DP algorithm. In this case, path planning of ECD method cannot guarantee the clearance. This paper proposes a CDP (Circumscribed DP) algorithm to solve this problem. The CDP algorithm has a disadvantage of having more inner area than the DP algorithm, but it can guarantee the clearance because of the fact the algorithm always has 0(%) of outer area (OA). In order to confirm this, the polygonal approximation of DP and CDP algorithms was compared in the same curvilinear obstacles and the result was as the following: When each ε value is 0.05, 0.08, 0.11(m), each result of the inner area ratio (IA) was 2.45, 4.89, 7.19(%) by DP algorithm, 16.3, 18.39, 32.58(%) by CDP algorithm, and result of the outer area ratio (OA) was 0.7, 1.17, 1.54(%) by DP Algorithm, 0, 0, 0(%) by CDP Algorithm. Also, it can be confirmed that the CDP algorithm has always guaranteed for clearance.","PeriodicalId":234023,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications (RiTA)","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circumscribed Douglas-Peucker Polygonal Approximation for Curvilinear Obstacle Representation\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Woo Jung, Byung-Chul So, Jin-Gu Kang, Woo-Jin Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RITAPP.2019.8932794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ECD (Exact Cell Decomposition) based path planning is not applicable in curvilinear obstacles environment. Therefore, after the curvilinear obstacles are approximated to the polygons by using DP (Douglas-Peucker) algorithm, which is a polygon approximation algorithm, the ECD method is applied. However, there is a case of not including all the existing obstacles' area and ignoring the outer area, when it comes to the curvilinear obstacles, approximated to the polygons by using the DP algorithm. In this case, path planning of ECD method cannot guarantee the clearance. This paper proposes a CDP (Circumscribed DP) algorithm to solve this problem. The CDP algorithm has a disadvantage of having more inner area than the DP algorithm, but it can guarantee the clearance because of the fact the algorithm always has 0(%) of outer area (OA). In order to confirm this, the polygonal approximation of DP and CDP algorithms was compared in the same curvilinear obstacles and the result was as the following: When each ε value is 0.05, 0.08, 0.11(m), each result of the inner area ratio (IA) was 2.45, 4.89, 7.19(%) by DP algorithm, 16.3, 18.39, 32.58(%) by CDP algorithm, and result of the outer area ratio (OA) was 0.7, 1.17, 1.54(%) by DP Algorithm, 0, 0, 0(%) by CDP Algorithm. Also, it can be confirmed that the CDP algorithm has always guaranteed for clearance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications (RiTA)\",\"volume\":\"325 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications (RiTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RITAPP.2019.8932794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications (RiTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RITAPP.2019.8932794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

基于精确单元分解(ECD)的路径规划不适用于曲线障碍物环境。因此,在使用多边形近似算法DP (Douglas-Peucker)算法将曲线障碍物近似为多边形后,应用ECD方法。然而,对于用DP算法逼近多边形的曲线型障碍物,存在不包括所有现有障碍物面积而忽略外部障碍物面积的情况。在这种情况下,ECD方法的路径规划不能保证间隙。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种CDP (restricted DP)算法。CDP算法的缺点是其内部面积比DP算法大,但由于其外部面积(OA)始终为0(%),因此可以保证清除。为了证实这一点,将DP算法和CDP算法在同一曲线障碍物上的多边形近似进行比较,结果如下:当ε值分别为0.05、0.08、0.11(m)时,DP算法的内面积比(IA)分别为2.45、4.89、7.19(%),CDP算法的16.3、18.39、32.58(%),DP算法的外面积比(OA)分别为0.7、1.17、1.54(%),CDP算法的0,0,0(%)。同时,可以确认CDP算法始终保证清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circumscribed Douglas-Peucker Polygonal Approximation for Curvilinear Obstacle Representation
ECD (Exact Cell Decomposition) based path planning is not applicable in curvilinear obstacles environment. Therefore, after the curvilinear obstacles are approximated to the polygons by using DP (Douglas-Peucker) algorithm, which is a polygon approximation algorithm, the ECD method is applied. However, there is a case of not including all the existing obstacles' area and ignoring the outer area, when it comes to the curvilinear obstacles, approximated to the polygons by using the DP algorithm. In this case, path planning of ECD method cannot guarantee the clearance. This paper proposes a CDP (Circumscribed DP) algorithm to solve this problem. The CDP algorithm has a disadvantage of having more inner area than the DP algorithm, but it can guarantee the clearance because of the fact the algorithm always has 0(%) of outer area (OA). In order to confirm this, the polygonal approximation of DP and CDP algorithms was compared in the same curvilinear obstacles and the result was as the following: When each ε value is 0.05, 0.08, 0.11(m), each result of the inner area ratio (IA) was 2.45, 4.89, 7.19(%) by DP algorithm, 16.3, 18.39, 32.58(%) by CDP algorithm, and result of the outer area ratio (OA) was 0.7, 1.17, 1.54(%) by DP Algorithm, 0, 0, 0(%) by CDP Algorithm. Also, it can be confirmed that the CDP algorithm has always guaranteed for clearance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信