采用PI, PID和DOB控制器同步速度和位置

Amel Ramdedović, Sejla Dzakmic, Nađa Viteškić
{"title":"采用PI, PID和DOB控制器同步速度和位置","authors":"Amel Ramdedović, Sejla Dzakmic, Nađa Viteškić","doi":"10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper depicts the difference among using PI, PID and DOB (disturbance observer) controllers utilized in synchronization of two DC motors. It is observed that the DOB controller provides significantly faster response and a minor ripple in comparison to the PI and PID controllers. In addition, in terms of the tracking of the reference signal, DOB outperforms the competitors and the error dynamics obtained in the experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the DOB in both tracking, convergence and response time. Furthermore, the inability to precisely tune PID and PI controllers is one of the major drawback to their utilization, which in the case of synchronization can lead to the unwanted oscillatory behavior, while the DOB adjusts swiftly without the requirement for precise tuning.","PeriodicalId":244595,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronization of Velocity and Position using PI, PID and DOB controllers\",\"authors\":\"Amel Ramdedović, Sejla Dzakmic, Nađa Viteškić\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper depicts the difference among using PI, PID and DOB (disturbance observer) controllers utilized in synchronization of two DC motors. It is observed that the DOB controller provides significantly faster response and a minor ripple in comparison to the PI and PID controllers. In addition, in terms of the tracking of the reference signal, DOB outperforms the competitors and the error dynamics obtained in the experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the DOB in both tracking, convergence and response time. Furthermore, the inability to precisely tune PID and PI controllers is one of the major drawback to their utilization, which in the case of synchronization can lead to the unwanted oscillatory behavior, while the DOB adjusts swiftly without the requirement for precise tuning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍了PI、PID和DOB(扰动观测器)控制器在两台直流电动机同步控制中的区别。可以观察到,与PI和PID控制器相比,DOB控制器提供了明显更快的响应和较小的纹波。此外,在参考信号的跟踪方面,DOB优于竞争对手,实验结果中获得的误差动态表明,DOB在跟踪、收敛和响应时间方面都具有优势。此外,无法精确调谐PID和PI控制器是其使用的主要缺点之一,这在同步的情况下可能导致不必要的振荡行为,而DOB调整迅速而不需要精确调谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synchronization of Velocity and Position using PI, PID and DOB controllers
This paper depicts the difference among using PI, PID and DOB (disturbance observer) controllers utilized in synchronization of two DC motors. It is observed that the DOB controller provides significantly faster response and a minor ripple in comparison to the PI and PID controllers. In addition, in terms of the tracking of the reference signal, DOB outperforms the competitors and the error dynamics obtained in the experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the DOB in both tracking, convergence and response time. Furthermore, the inability to precisely tune PID and PI controllers is one of the major drawback to their utilization, which in the case of synchronization can lead to the unwanted oscillatory behavior, while the DOB adjusts swiftly without the requirement for precise tuning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信