测试和验证本科课程中电子协作的概念框架

Alimatu-Saadia Yussiff, W. Ahmad, E. E. Mustapha
{"title":"测试和验证本科课程中电子协作的概念框架","authors":"Alimatu-Saadia Yussiff, W. Ahmad, E. E. Mustapha","doi":"10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic collaboration can provide the environments for educators and learners to connect electronically via the Internet to study together, communicate discuss, and to exchange information and resources from anywhere, anytime and in any place. However, despite the progress registered in the use of e-collaboration system as educational tools through the incorporation of constructivism learning theories and its related didactics in higher educational institution, the approach has not yet been successfully transferred to the classroom. More importantly, there are still misconceptions among researchers regarding students achieving authentic learning from online interaction and collaboration. In an attempt to close this gap, a framework was developed to assist in the design, development and implementation of e-collaboration in a higher education institution. The framework addresses the development process of e-collaboration content, approaches for e-collaboration, pedagogical didactics, learning theories, and roles of users in e-collaboration. In an attempt to validate the framework, an e-collaboration system named `Teach, Learn, and Research E-collaboration System' (TELERECS), was developed and experimentally implemented in a classroom context. An experimental research design based on control and experimental groups, pre/post-test and usability survey were used to validate the framework. The results revealed that there is significant difference between the post-test mean scores of the experimental and control groups. In addition, there is moderate, positive monotonic correlation between easy to use and post-test-scores; and between useful for team work and post-test-score for the experimental group. These imply that the framework offers a promising basis for meaningful learning. Future work includes a further exploration and validation of the framework and comparing results.","PeriodicalId":407600,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","volume":"635 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing and validating a conceptual framework for e-collaboration in an undergraduate course\",\"authors\":\"Alimatu-Saadia Yussiff, W. Ahmad, E. E. Mustapha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electronic collaboration can provide the environments for educators and learners to connect electronically via the Internet to study together, communicate discuss, and to exchange information and resources from anywhere, anytime and in any place. However, despite the progress registered in the use of e-collaboration system as educational tools through the incorporation of constructivism learning theories and its related didactics in higher educational institution, the approach has not yet been successfully transferred to the classroom. More importantly, there are still misconceptions among researchers regarding students achieving authentic learning from online interaction and collaboration. In an attempt to close this gap, a framework was developed to assist in the design, development and implementation of e-collaboration in a higher education institution. The framework addresses the development process of e-collaboration content, approaches for e-collaboration, pedagogical didactics, learning theories, and roles of users in e-collaboration. In an attempt to validate the framework, an e-collaboration system named `Teach, Learn, and Research E-collaboration System' (TELERECS), was developed and experimentally implemented in a classroom context. An experimental research design based on control and experimental groups, pre/post-test and usability survey were used to validate the framework. The results revealed that there is significant difference between the post-test mean scores of the experimental and control groups. In addition, there is moderate, positive monotonic correlation between easy to use and post-test-scores; and between useful for team work and post-test-score for the experimental group. These imply that the framework offers a promising basis for meaningful learning. Future work includes a further exploration and validation of the framework and comparing results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)\",\"volume\":\"635 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

电子协作为教育者和学习者提供了通过互联网进行电子连接的环境,可以在任何地点、任何时间、任何地点共同学习、交流讨论、交换信息和资源。然而,尽管通过结合建构主义学习理论及其相关教学在高等教育机构中使用电子协作系统作为教育工具取得了进展,但这种方法尚未成功地转移到课堂上。更重要的是,研究人员对学生通过在线互动和协作实现真正的学习仍然存在误解。为了缩小这一差距,我们开发了一个框架来帮助高等教育机构设计、开发和实施电子协作。该框架讨论了电子协作内容的开发过程、电子协作的方法、教学方法、学习理论以及用户在电子协作中的角色。为了验证该框架,开发了一个名为“教、学、研电子协作系统”(TELERECS)的电子协作系统,并在课堂环境中进行了实验实施。采用基于对照组和实验组、前后测试和可用性调查的实验研究设计对框架进行验证。结果显示,实验组和对照组的测试后平均得分有显著差异。此外,易用性与测试后得分之间存在适度的正单调相关;在团队合作和实验组的测试后得分之间。这意味着该框架为有意义的学习提供了一个有希望的基础。未来的工作包括对框架的进一步探索和验证以及结果的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing and validating a conceptual framework for e-collaboration in an undergraduate course
Electronic collaboration can provide the environments for educators and learners to connect electronically via the Internet to study together, communicate discuss, and to exchange information and resources from anywhere, anytime and in any place. However, despite the progress registered in the use of e-collaboration system as educational tools through the incorporation of constructivism learning theories and its related didactics in higher educational institution, the approach has not yet been successfully transferred to the classroom. More importantly, there are still misconceptions among researchers regarding students achieving authentic learning from online interaction and collaboration. In an attempt to close this gap, a framework was developed to assist in the design, development and implementation of e-collaboration in a higher education institution. The framework addresses the development process of e-collaboration content, approaches for e-collaboration, pedagogical didactics, learning theories, and roles of users in e-collaboration. In an attempt to validate the framework, an e-collaboration system named `Teach, Learn, and Research E-collaboration System' (TELERECS), was developed and experimentally implemented in a classroom context. An experimental research design based on control and experimental groups, pre/post-test and usability survey were used to validate the framework. The results revealed that there is significant difference between the post-test mean scores of the experimental and control groups. In addition, there is moderate, positive monotonic correlation between easy to use and post-test-scores; and between useful for team work and post-test-score for the experimental group. These imply that the framework offers a promising basis for meaningful learning. Future work includes a further exploration and validation of the framework and comparing results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信