照相机与四象限检测器在红细胞变形性测量中的比较

A. Finkelstein, Hugues Talbot, S. Topsu, T. Cynober, L. Garçon, Gregor Havkin, F. Kuypers
{"title":"照相机与四象限检测器在红细胞变形性测量中的比较","authors":"A. Finkelstein, Hugues Talbot, S. Topsu, T. Cynober, L. Garçon, Gregor Havkin, F. Kuypers","doi":"10.12720/JOMB.2.1.62-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of red blood cells (RBC) to deform under vascular conditions is essential for circulation. RBC deformability, measured at different shear rates and osmolalities, provides a useful way to evaluate RBC function and is used to diagnose several hereditary blood disorders. In clinical practice, ektacytometry has been used as a routine automated technique for measuring RBC deformability under shear stress at known osmolalities. RBC suspension is exposed to laser light and the resulting diffraction pattern is recorded. The mean deformability of the cells is characterized by the diffraction pattern. Our study is the first to compare the correspondence between two methods that measure diffraction simultaneously, on the same apparatus. Additionally, while others conducted studies under varying shear we used varying osmolalities. A laser beam splitter produced two identical diffraction patterns, evaluated by synchronous data acquisition and analysis: One pattern was acquired by a digital camera and analyzed by image processing software. The other was analyzed using photodiode measurement at four fixed points and a microcontroller interface. Data analysis resulted in two deformability vs. osmolality curves. Comparing these curves shows excellent overlap in shape with a clear difference in amplitude. Since routine Manuscript received Jan 15, 2013; revised March 1, 2013. patient curves are always compared to a normal control curve, the amplitue difference is not significant. Our results indicate that either method may be used for clinically-usable interpretation of RBC deformability, but also that additional studies are required in order to compare repeatability for both methods, and to demonstrate that the two curves overlap for a variety of pathologies.","PeriodicalId":437476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical and bioengineering","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between a Camera and a Four Quadrant Detector, in the Measurement of Red Blood Cell Deformability\",\"authors\":\"A. Finkelstein, Hugues Talbot, S. Topsu, T. Cynober, L. Garçon, Gregor Havkin, F. Kuypers\",\"doi\":\"10.12720/JOMB.2.1.62-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability of red blood cells (RBC) to deform under vascular conditions is essential for circulation. RBC deformability, measured at different shear rates and osmolalities, provides a useful way to evaluate RBC function and is used to diagnose several hereditary blood disorders. In clinical practice, ektacytometry has been used as a routine automated technique for measuring RBC deformability under shear stress at known osmolalities. RBC suspension is exposed to laser light and the resulting diffraction pattern is recorded. The mean deformability of the cells is characterized by the diffraction pattern. Our study is the first to compare the correspondence between two methods that measure diffraction simultaneously, on the same apparatus. Additionally, while others conducted studies under varying shear we used varying osmolalities. A laser beam splitter produced two identical diffraction patterns, evaluated by synchronous data acquisition and analysis: One pattern was acquired by a digital camera and analyzed by image processing software. The other was analyzed using photodiode measurement at four fixed points and a microcontroller interface. Data analysis resulted in two deformability vs. osmolality curves. Comparing these curves shows excellent overlap in shape with a clear difference in amplitude. Since routine Manuscript received Jan 15, 2013; revised March 1, 2013. patient curves are always compared to a normal control curve, the amplitue difference is not significant. Our results indicate that either method may be used for clinically-usable interpretation of RBC deformability, but also that additional studies are required in order to compare repeatability for both methods, and to demonstrate that the two curves overlap for a variety of pathologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical and bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical and bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12720/JOMB.2.1.62-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical and bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/JOMB.2.1.62-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

红细胞(RBC)在血管条件下变形的能力对血液循环至关重要。在不同的剪切速率和渗透压下测量红细胞变形能力,提供了一种评估红细胞功能的有用方法,并用于诊断几种遗传性血液疾病。在临床实践中,分光光度法已被用作一种常规的自动化技术来测量红细胞在已知渗透压下剪切应力下的变形能力。红细胞悬浮液暴露在激光下,并记录所得的衍射图样。衍射图表征了细胞的平均变形能力。我们的研究首次比较了在同一仪器上同时测量衍射的两种方法之间的对应关系。此外,当其他人在不同的剪切下进行研究时,我们使用了不同的渗透压。激光分束器产生两种相同的衍射图案,通过同步数据采集和分析进行评估:一种图案由数码相机采集并通过图像处理软件进行分析。另一种是利用光电二极管在四个固定点测量和微控制器接口进行分析。数据分析得出两条变形性与渗透压曲线。比较这些曲线,可以发现形状上有很好的重叠,振幅上有明显的差别。自2013年1月15日收到例行稿至今;2013年3月1日修订。患者曲线总是与正常对照曲线比较,幅度差异不显著。我们的结果表明,任何一种方法都可以用于临床可用的RBC变形性解释,但也需要额外的研究来比较两种方法的可重复性,并证明两种曲线在各种病理中重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between a Camera and a Four Quadrant Detector, in the Measurement of Red Blood Cell Deformability
The ability of red blood cells (RBC) to deform under vascular conditions is essential for circulation. RBC deformability, measured at different shear rates and osmolalities, provides a useful way to evaluate RBC function and is used to diagnose several hereditary blood disorders. In clinical practice, ektacytometry has been used as a routine automated technique for measuring RBC deformability under shear stress at known osmolalities. RBC suspension is exposed to laser light and the resulting diffraction pattern is recorded. The mean deformability of the cells is characterized by the diffraction pattern. Our study is the first to compare the correspondence between two methods that measure diffraction simultaneously, on the same apparatus. Additionally, while others conducted studies under varying shear we used varying osmolalities. A laser beam splitter produced two identical diffraction patterns, evaluated by synchronous data acquisition and analysis: One pattern was acquired by a digital camera and analyzed by image processing software. The other was analyzed using photodiode measurement at four fixed points and a microcontroller interface. Data analysis resulted in two deformability vs. osmolality curves. Comparing these curves shows excellent overlap in shape with a clear difference in amplitude. Since routine Manuscript received Jan 15, 2013; revised March 1, 2013. patient curves are always compared to a normal control curve, the amplitue difference is not significant. Our results indicate that either method may be used for clinically-usable interpretation of RBC deformability, but also that additional studies are required in order to compare repeatability for both methods, and to demonstrate that the two curves overlap for a variety of pathologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信