ADAS的因果分析:文献综述与投诉资料的比较研究

Jackie Ayoub, Zifei Wang, Meitang Li, Huizhong Guo, Rini Sherony, Shan Bao, Feng Zhou
{"title":"ADAS的因果分析:文献综述与投诉资料的比较研究","authors":"Jackie Ayoub, Zifei Wang, Meitang Li, Huizhong Guo, Rini Sherony, Shan Bao, Feng Zhou","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3547117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to improve vehicle safety. However, it is difficult to achieve such benefits without understanding the causes and limitations of the current ADAS and their possible solutions. This study 1) investigated the limitations and solutions of ADAS through a literature review, 2) identified the causes and effects of ADAS through consumer complaints using natural language processing models, and 3) compared the major differences between the two. These two lines of research identified similar categories of ADAS causes, including human factors, environmental factors, and vehicle factors. However, academic research focused more on human factors of ADAS issues and proposed advanced algorithms to mitigate such issues while drivers complained more of vehicle factors of ADAS failures, which led to associated top consequences. The findings from these two sources tend to complement each other and provide important implications for the improvement of ADAS in the future.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cause-and-Effect Analysis of ADAS: A Comparison Study between Literature Review and Complaint Data\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Ayoub, Zifei Wang, Meitang Li, Huizhong Guo, Rini Sherony, Shan Bao, Feng Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3543174.3547117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to improve vehicle safety. However, it is difficult to achieve such benefits without understanding the causes and limitations of the current ADAS and their possible solutions. This study 1) investigated the limitations and solutions of ADAS through a literature review, 2) identified the causes and effects of ADAS through consumer complaints using natural language processing models, and 3) compared the major differences between the two. These two lines of research identified similar categories of ADAS causes, including human factors, environmental factors, and vehicle factors. However, academic research focused more on human factors of ADAS issues and proposed advanced algorithms to mitigate such issues while drivers complained more of vehicle factors of ADAS failures, which led to associated top consequences. The findings from these two sources tend to complement each other and provide important implications for the improvement of ADAS in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3547117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3547117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)是为了提高车辆安全性而设计的。然而,如果不了解当前ADAS的原因和局限性及其可能的解决方案,很难实现这些好处。本研究1)通过文献综述探讨了ADAS的局限性和解决方案,2)使用自然语言处理模型通过消费者投诉识别ADAS的原因和影响,3)比较了两者的主要差异。这两项研究确定了类似的ADAS原因类别,包括人为因素、环境因素和车辆因素。然而,学术研究更多地关注ADAS问题的人为因素,并提出了先进的算法来缓解这些问题,而驾驶员更多地抱怨ADAS故障的车辆因素,从而导致相关的最高后果。这两个来源的研究结果往往是相互补充的,并为未来ADAS的改进提供了重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cause-and-Effect Analysis of ADAS: A Comparison Study between Literature Review and Complaint Data
Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to improve vehicle safety. However, it is difficult to achieve such benefits without understanding the causes and limitations of the current ADAS and their possible solutions. This study 1) investigated the limitations and solutions of ADAS through a literature review, 2) identified the causes and effects of ADAS through consumer complaints using natural language processing models, and 3) compared the major differences between the two. These two lines of research identified similar categories of ADAS causes, including human factors, environmental factors, and vehicle factors. However, academic research focused more on human factors of ADAS issues and proposed advanced algorithms to mitigate such issues while drivers complained more of vehicle factors of ADAS failures, which led to associated top consequences. The findings from these two sources tend to complement each other and provide important implications for the improvement of ADAS in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信