马克思主义与边际主义

Yuriy Knyazev
{"title":"马克思主义与边际主义","authors":"Yuriy Knyazev","doi":"10.31857/s020736760018278-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.","PeriodicalId":228596,"journal":{"name":"Obshchestvo i ekonomika","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marxism vs. marginalism\",\"authors\":\"Yuriy Knyazev\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s020736760018278-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obshchestvo i ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obshchestvo i ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020736760018278-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obshchestvo i ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020736760018278-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文包含了英国学者F. Wicksteed和俄国学者R. Kapelyushnikov对马克思理论的反对意见,他们认为马克思的理论与胜利的边际主义相比是错误的。作者以自己的观点来证明马克思主义的一种生命力,它对资本主义进行了复杂的科学批判,并揭示了资本主义作为一个不公平和不人道的社会的剥削本质和历史厄运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marxism vs. marginalism
The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信