{"title":"马克思主义与边际主义","authors":"Yuriy Knyazev","doi":"10.31857/s020736760018278-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.","PeriodicalId":228596,"journal":{"name":"Obshchestvo i ekonomika","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marxism vs. marginalism\",\"authors\":\"Yuriy Knyazev\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s020736760018278-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obshchestvo i ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obshchestvo i ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020736760018278-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obshchestvo i ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020736760018278-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper contains objections by F. Wicksteed, an English scholar, and R. Kapelyushnikov, a scholar from Russia, against K. Marx’s theory which is considered by both as erroneous in comparison with triumphant marginalism. The author gives his own arguments to prove a vital force of Marxism which has offered a complex scientific criticism of capitalism, and shown the exploitative nature and historical doom of the latter as an unfair and inhumane society.